a Here is a new idea to exploit a regular pattern which occurs frequently
between "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

A run of length x is always observed after the fact. For example, playing Red/Black, we will observe a run of length x only when the run ends, I.e., one spin later.

R,B,B,B,R,... We have one run of length 1, one run of length 3 and one we don't know yet as we do not see its completion.

Here is my suggestion on how to track RUNS during the course of a session. Keep a count which will increase +1 when you observe a run of length > 1 and decrease -1 when you observe a run of length 1. That's it, as simple as that. We are not interested to note how long is a run, we just want to count how many runs last 1 spin versus runs which last more than 1 spin.

Let's look at the evolution of this count for a given day (Wiesbaden table 2 - February 14, 2008) :
-1, 0, 1, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -2, -1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -4, -5, -4, -5, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -8, -7, -8, -7, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -9, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -9, -10, -11, -10, -11, -10, -9, -10, -9, -10

By simply looking at the evolution of the count, we can deduct there have been more runs of length 1 than runs of length > 1.

Let's look at it by converting the count into a graphic representation...

Graph representing Runs Of Length 1 versus Runs Of Length > 1



What stands out in this graph are the many periods of stability we can observe. I was quite astounded to note that most days of Wiesbaden or Hamburg have plenty of them. So much indeed that it prompted me to test an idea using a simple Alembert progression and which works very smoothly.

I'll get back to the method later on. Meanwhile try to see by yourself by looking at the graph or the count above how you could come up with a tactic to exploit these "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

You'll be agreeably surprised.

More to come...

Thanks VLS for your feedback.

Here is a run I did on 10000 spins from Hamburg :



When it climbs, it climbs  

Here is my cunning plan to take advantage of "Runs Of Length 1" versus "Runs Of Length > 1".

(This idea can be applied to the game of Baccarat or Roulette by selecting an even chance like Red/Black.)

As mentionned in my first comment, it's easy to track the many RUNS during the course of a session. We just need to keep a count which will increase +1 when we observe a run of length > 1 and decrease -1 when we observe a run of length 1. We are not interested to note how long is a run, we just want to count how many runs last 1 spin versus runs which last more than 1 spin.

THE SYSTEM
As you update the count of RUNS you'll notice that some values of this running count keep repeating more than others. Your objective will be to target those values which repeat the most. This can't be easier than this. Look at the following graph where the evolution of the count is shown (Wiesbaden, February 21, 2008 Table 2).

When a run of length > 1 is observed, the curve goes up /. When a run of length 1 is observed, the curve goes down \. I have used a red rectangle to stress some periods of play where the same count value kept repeating over and over.



This recurring passage of the "running count" in the same spot is a constant you can observe in the vast majority of "data streams". The probability to make at least one unit/day with this system using a flat bet amount is in my opinion very high.

Here are some more examples :

The idea is to target the dominant horizontal lines. You can use different strategies.

As woul say VIC, when there is concentration of both small streaks and chop's.