Thanks Arte! [smiley=dankk2.gif]

This example shows two patterns which repeat a lot :

The "[size=12]W[/size]" shape is one of the pattern which repeats quite often too. This is the first pattern I generally target.

Neither of these. I try not to use fixed rules but hey ! we need to start somewhere. And I never bet by feeling instead I test and see if my set of patterns is hitting according to expectation in which case I bet they will keep hitting. They never failed me yet. Don't try to catch the same event over and over in a systematic way instead be flexible accept to bet less at times but always try to win your session.

It is difficult to explain everything in a single and limited thread like this. Ideally, if you would sit beside me you'd see how I operate. I usually approach the game using a very open mind. I let the stream develop and I jump into action as soon as I detect a particular portion of the stream will repeat. Roulette is a device which produces a lot of repeatition. Once you realise this then your method of play change completely. You are no more able to use a fixed set of rules. You just want to adapt to the stream and follow its tides.

Remember this, two players could be exposed to the same string of decisions but see 2 completely different things. Think about it and you'll realise it's because of their frame of interpretation. You need a simple frame of reference rich enough but not too complicated as I tried to show within the confine of this very limited thread.

 [smiley=shocked.gif]

A trend may just be an illusion. I don't chase trends with my latest approach instead I have took the time to compile many thousands of decisions to see what was the most recurrent events after a streak had ended its course and to my great stupefaction I found out that these "after streak periods" produce a lot of instability where the amplitude of the swing between two opposite events stays within a certain limited corridor long enough to be exploited. This is what I am trying to show you.

Here is another sequence I took on Wiesbaden for today table 3 :


Periods of instability are easy to identify after these streaks.

Now, look at these very typical figures we get in all streams :

Why look so close?

What works for me is knowing the good/bad shape reading the trend.

 Looking the lines, you will see how  some lines are longer than others. So if you put them together within 15 spins for example, you will get a nice reference how the situation is, by checking wich line is he longest. Then to bet groups where I find the balance is coming, is easy somehow. Flat betting 10 spins or so in order to get the balance, is for me more secure than betting 1 or 2 times out of 10.

JD.

The circles are the formation of M W V and /\, and the squares are for the figures after a streak

Cheers

J.Daniels wrote :

Although you can look at it this way, this is not my case. I always try to avoid selection of bets based on fallacies such as this. The concept of balance or return to a state of balance in the short term is the gambler's fallacy in all its glory. The better you can get rid of these thoughts the better it gets. In a way, you must empty your mind as this is a random game. I rarely place many consecutive bets as I prefer to bet at specific key frames so to speak. If I evaluate I can place many consecutive bets then I'll do it but as soon as I lose a bet, I stop and look for the next opportunity. I never force or try to impose my game to the Game