Gizmotron, certain techniques aren't ready for public consumption. There is privileged information I won't share here, or in fact anywhere. I've been reading some of your stuff. It seems that a lot of stick you get is derived from frustration. As for money management I don;t have any to speak of. I go to the casino with 1000 euros and aim to win a roundabout figure of 30-50%. It's a bit slapdash. I don't like losing more than 500 euros, so if I get to that point I'll stop. I know the wheel, I learnt the layout simply from years of testing and crunching numbers. Mostly I can get away with tracking on an index card. I try to occupy as much space as possible close to the wheel so I can see the spin and also easily reach the far end of the table. 'm quite tall so I never have a problem. I won't play when it's busy. I think choosing the right time to play under the right conditions, I'm talking physical conditions, is important for concentration purposes etc.    

Metalrat, I consider artificial neural networks similar if not identical to the adaptive strategy. The inner mechanics are powered by the same concepts such as interdependency and connectivity. While technically concerned with sound, the techniques I use are similar to a NN's function of finding relationships between patterns and outputs. One thing you can rely on regarding the difference in dealer is periods of sector dominance. That is my primary mode of attack. If I'm betting 6 numbers I may find that two particular sectors are dominating in the current (say) 15spin rotation. I would look at the relationship between the sectors hits, and a time series will help to determine the best moment to bet on one or both. I coordinate attacks over a small number of spins, or until the dominance ends. Like you say its important to filter out useless data such as sleeping sectors.    

By the way, I didn't mean to imply that it's totally easy. Overall the strategy is simple to execute because it isn't based on anything convoluted, but it CAN be difficult to learn because some concepts are daunting.  

Bateman

And why are my posts automatically formatted to put 5 spaces between each sentance?

Meaning a system is based on some sort of pivotal event, the frequency of the event has to be high in order for the system to generate a continual profit. When the frequency is low, the system is based on a rare event and uses a progression to recoup expenditure, which is the very worst way of playing the game and very savage. A system NEEDS something definitive to happen. Randomness won't always produce the event, so the system fails. Strategies don't rely on anything to happen because the key is to simply follow what the wheel is doing. You don't have to consider very specific details or wait for or hope for very specific events. Literally an adaptive strategy is based on nothing because it changes all the time. . . all it does is constantly exploit favourable betting conditions. Yes, you have to use betting indicators, but that is about the only thing that is fixed. There simply is no other effective way of attacking the wheel, minus visual ballistics. 

Hi Lohnro,

I would suggest not having your sectors set like example A=32,15,19,4,21,2    B=25,17,34,6,27,13 ... I have designed and tested loads and loads of sector systems and the one reason why I think these systems fail in the long run is because of the set sector, (we need to adapt sectors to whats happening at the wheel at the time you sit down. I have been getting astounding results with my new type of play, playing sectors of 9 numbers.

So hope I save you some time Lohnro 


mattjono

Hi Mattjono,

So you do not use set sectors then. I have looked at using frequency analysis of set sectors
in the past. Do you also use something like this to form your variable sectors?

metalrat

Hi Lohnro, thanks for your question.  It is wise to cover fundamental issues regarding the adaptive strategy before jumping in and trying to master the techniques involved.  Firstly, I know there are a few other people using or learning adaptation, they may use different styles and methods but for the way I play it is important to use constant sectors.  With variable sectors you would only get a smudged picture of the wheel at best.  A number hits, a sector hits - you would get a distorted analysis if the sectors kept changing.  For starters I would recommend using one group of 10 numbers (containing the zero) and three groups of 9 numbers. 

Mattjono,the systems fail because of the techinques used to calculate the bets.  You can use variable sectors, or rather more than one set of sectors (so you would track 8 sectors instead of 4).  That involves analysing two sets of data and is hard to implement in a land casino.

I don't have a lot of time right now.  But I have an example I can show those interested, soon hopefully :)

Bateman