Roulette Forum | Roulette System Message Boards » Main » Brainstorming » Again....another thought
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Down
« previous next »
Print
Author Topic: Again....another thought  (Read 2107 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
celiza427
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 124
« Reply #75 on: June 28, 2009, 09:18:55 PM »
 ReplyReply
I was just as lost as most people in here, but after 2 pages of extra explanation I now believe I've got it, lol.

Just a question tho Ken...in your test from yesterday where you're up $9,000+, did you ever bust your progression?  Also, if you have the info readily available, what is your avg spin won on?
Logged
Homeito
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 164



WWW
« Reply #76 on: June 29, 2009, 02:54:20 AM »
 ReplyReply
Hello,

Ken...

I like your idea as you randomly (more or less) select a new number each time.
Smiley
That is a nice idea!



@ All who do not understand what Ken is doing...

I will try to explain but as Ken say you NEED to do this on paper to understand.


OK so #0 is your FIRST number. And you cross it.
As many of you already understand you will bet #32 as it is the first unhit number clock-wise off #0.
This is because you have NOT made ANY bets before this.
*** 0 hits - bet 32. (Always remember the last number you bet!)


Your next number is #10. Cross it.

Now you look clock-wise from your last number BET (#32) to the first HIT (crossed) number. This is #10.
And you bet the first UN-HIT number clock-wise off the crossed number: So you bet #5 because it is not crossed.
*** 10 hits - bet 5. (Always remember the last number you bet!)


The next number is #27. Cross it.

Now you look clock-wise from your last number BET (#5) to the first HIT (crossed) number. This is #0.
And you bet the first UN-HIT number clock-wise off the crossed number: So you bet #32 because it is not crossed.
*** 27 hits - bet 32.


The next number is #23. Cross it.

Now you look clock-wise from your last number BET (#32) to the first HIT (crossed) number. This is #27.
And you bet the first UN-HIT number clock-wise off the crossed number: So you bet #13 because it is not crossed.
*** 23 hits - bet 13.


The next number is #4. Cross it.

Now you look clock-wise from your last number BET (#13) to the first HIT (crossed) number. This is #23.
And you bet the first UN-HIT number clock-wise off the crossed number: So you bet #5 because it is not crossed. (#10 is crossed and skipped!)
*** 4 hits - bet 5.


The next number is #22. Cross it.

Now you look clock-wise from your last number BET (#5) to the first HIT (crossed) number. This is #22.
And you bet the first UN-HIT number clock-wise off the crossed number: So you bet #18 because it is not crossed.
*** 22 hits - bet 18.

*** 19 hits - bet 32.

*** 4 hits - bet 21.


If you did this on paper - I mean really crossed hits and looked clock-wise for the numbers - I am sure you understand now.


Best regards,
Homeito Bemek

[edit 02:38 am] Sorry - I made a mistake in the two last. Should be correct now. ?
(Too early in the morning)
Logged
If Black has hit 30 times in a row there is both a possibility and a probability for it to hit again.
But maybe it is not very likely?
(Paraphrasing Grabb)
__________________________________________________________
Roulette Misconceptions Debunked by Homeito Bemek
homeito. comlu. com
(No ads and nothing for sale)
Homeito
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 164



WWW
« Reply #77 on: June 29, 2009, 03:16:55 AM »
 ReplyReply
Hello,

Here is a pdf to print with lots of 0-wheels for crossing numbers.


Best regards,
Homeito Bemek

[edit 02:39 am] Please note that I made a mistake in the previous post! Thank you.
* 0-Wheels.pdf (132.96 KB - downloaded 41 times.)
Logged
If Black has hit 30 times in a row there is both a possibility and a probability for it to hit again.
But maybe it is not very likely?
(Paraphrasing Grabb)
__________________________________________________________
Roulette Misconceptions Debunked by Homeito Bemek
homeito. comlu. com
(No ads and nothing for sale)
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #78 on: June 29, 2009, 06:09:22 PM »
 ReplyReply
"betting 1 number 85 times is not long enough" >>> @Bombus.... I understand what you are saying but I look at it a bit different. I look at my NET wins more than the average bettor here. I actually study NET wins. lol If I wanted, I could make the progression 120 spins. The nets are so high, it reaches $2,200 quite fast (knock on wood). "did you ever bust your progression?  Also, if you have the info readily available, what is your avg spin won on?" >>> @celiza427.....The progression did not bust in those tests, 71 latest win. The average (tests) was spin 41.  Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #79 on: June 29, 2009, 06:17:44 PM »
 ReplyReply
My results for today >>> ("Ken is such a bullshitter", whatever)....... Just under 9 hours of play. Net of $1,730. Latest win AGAIN was on the 71st spin (same as my testing, odd but means nothing). 18 total wins. I will be switching to $15 min. bets on my next visit. The NET wins are higher. 1-88, $3,025 if I lose. Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #80 on: June 30, 2009, 09:50:51 AM »
 ReplyReply
2 more sidenotes: When you get a WIN, you could use that number for your next session to start. Meaning, lets say you just won on the #14. Starting off on your next session, start with the #31. Its up to you, not a big difference. Also, this is not a method to use at a crowded table. If you use a LONG progression like me, it could take 2.5 hours to get a win, thats too much time wasted. Play it at a table with little or no crowd, my opinion.  Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #81 on: July 02, 2009, 05:14:04 PM »
 ReplyReply
Played this again today (6 hours). Netted $1,370, thank you. Latest win was on 68. Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #82 on: August 21, 2009, 02:26:49 AM »
 ReplyReply
This thread is another good example (not rippin on anyone). Alot of guys here seemed interested in the idea. I STILL play/test this. My rule as ALWAYS....if a method starts to lose and lose, I kick it to the side, never talking/playing it again but so far, its doing well. My point being, another idea that gets swept under the rug. Posters lose interest and EVERYONE is once again on a quest for the HG which does not exist. Thats confusing to me.  Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"
kav
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 100


restless soul
« Reply #83 on: August 26, 2009, 10:05:40 AM »
 ReplyReply
Totally agree with you.
There have been presented some really interesting ideas (maybe even truly winning systems) but none has the patience, the insistence or the mathematics background to pursue them further.
It seems more interesting to read about just another fancy bet selection method (most times without any explanation why it may work).
I'm convinced that most people here (and in in most forums) are for "edutainment" purposes and not to beat the wheel and make a buck.


The most obvious example, are all those who just pop in in every thread to remind us that there is the house edge and roulette can't be beaten (except maybe from THEIR way, which they do not reveal). These people can't be here for serious discussion, they are here just for the fun of pissing others off.
Logged
Mr J
Progre$$ion Lunatic
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1721


Senior member
« Reply #84 on: August 26, 2009, 11:05:06 AM »
 ReplyReply
"just for the fun of pissing others off." >>> Thats one thing and the other is.... I really think that alot of posters want a method such as this >>> a max. BR of $200. You only play for two hours a day and net $1,300 per visit. If they DONT have that system, they think they'll just sit around and wait for it here or at another board. lol  Ken
Logged
"There is no off position on the genius switch"

Learn how to develop an effective roulette system: Learn the truth about beating roulette, and exactly why most roulette systems fail. Save yourself time and effort. If you understand what roulette is, and what others have tried extensively, you'll know what can and cannot work before developing your roulette strategy. Also see roulette system reviews to avoid being scammed.

Genuine Winning Roulette System: learn how to win at roulette consistently with a genuine winning roulette system, and turn the edge in your favor.

Play roulette for a living: Pay $0.00 up-front for a roulette computer to play roulette, and pay only 50% of your winnings. Test it all you like before risking a cent. The devices are FREE - you only pay half of your winnings. The devices are legal apply in many jursidictions, but application is still completely hidden and covert because casinos do not tolerate consistent winners, regardless of how winnings are achieved.
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6]   Go Up
Print
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
just a thought
General Board 		pins 0 95 Last post April 05, 2009, 06:32:13 PM
by pins
staying between the streaks just a thought
General Board 		ikarianman 0 89 Last post April 15, 2009, 06:43:48 PM
by ikarianman
just a genral question and a thought...
General Board 		cabbage 7 278 Last post May 11, 2009, 03:49:01 PM
by The Spiders Kiss
So.....every idea has been thought of?
Main Roulette Board 		Mr J 8 321 Last post September 20, 2009, 04:27:02 PM
by Bo0Merang
Jishs Old (thought it was HG) System
Full Roulette Systems 		Jish 5 444 Last post January 07, 2010, 04:37:26 AM
by Jish