"The point of the paper is not to confirm this:

Bayesian probability
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability

Predictive inference
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_inference

Subjective Probability
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subjective_probability.asp

Conditional Probability
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/conditional_probability.asp

The point is to postulate Cognitive Intuition."

You might be surprised about the cryptic suggestion about making up parameters. Anyway, you want to be able to relate to the nature of randomness in an awareness kind of way. You must establish a way to recognize situations. I do that by practicing recognizing or recognition itself. The reason I do this is because almost all the time the trends, streaks, patterns, or dominances are unique. If you think about it, the most recent spins are unique anyway. I think people can learn to be comfortable with reading randomness as it happens. Using a parameter to get conclusions is one way to establish a premise for bet selection. It's just a tool to have a bet selection process. Didn't you know that educated guessing is about making an informed best guess based on experience and intuition. "How is it going" is very important. I'm constantly testing the scenarios in my mind, like a chess player looking at several options by imagining several moves ahead. I'm always searching for what is working best. This is different than what Spike does, I think. He has come up with a bet selection premise that looks back just a few spins and looks forward just to the next spin. In all that he knows intuitively that he must be aware of the situation that currently exists. I have no idea what he actually does. He never shared that with me. Perhaps there are many ways to relate to randomness as it occurs.

Very few bother to practice real play techniques. I created a charting program to help others practice with. It was downloaded by a few and never had a discussion of its effectiveness. You can't use it in a casino anyway. It just saves me from having to write out charts on a card. At this point all I do is practice seeing powerful dominances. In effect, a zig zag chop in the EC's is a powerful dominance. I just see better ones in the table dozens & columns, and spoke shaped sets found on the wheel itself. I went with what I already had known very well as a playing style. I knew the dozens and columns and I knew hot number detection. For me it was learning how to relate to randomness with regards to what I already knew.

See you all. I'm pretty sure that this section will be dropped when the new landlord shows up.