Roulette Forum | Roulette System Message Boards » Main » Roulette & Gambling framework » Something to think about
Pages: [1]   Go Down
« previous next »
Print
Author Topic: Something to think about  (Read 1076 times) Average Rating: 0
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
winkel
Guest
« on: July 01, 2009, 04:41:10 PM »
 ReplyReply
I was sent to this page.

crackingpi.com

open minded people will enjoy it.

br
winkel
Logged
ozshabs
Perseverant Member
****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 64
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2009, 09:37:48 PM »
 ReplyReply
interesting site, winkel

Thanks for posting
Logged
Proofreaders2000
Guest
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2009, 04:03:42 AM »
 ReplyReply
Thanks, Winkel good
Logged
ChickenDinner
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 273


You'll Always Find Me In The Kitchen At Parties!
« Reply #3 on: July 05, 2009, 07:25:21 AM »
 ReplyReply
CRACKING ROULETTE

Thanks Winkel.

The Gravity Bet

The author claims "The gravity bet succeeds because the three pole geometric structure of the prediction or bet matches the three pole geometric structure of that which is being predicted or bet. In every case, that structure is a diameter. "

OK then, here's how it works: 3 spins. You ignore the 2nd spin, but "the third ball is predicted to land in one of the five pockets directly and physically across the wheel from the pocket of the first ball."

Simple.

Is there anything in this? Could this really give you a .16666 flat bet geometric advantage? Or is this some kind of joke...?

Any thoughts. Discussion?

Cheers
CD
Logged
The only way to always win is not to play
hoper35
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 336
« Reply #4 on: July 05, 2009, 06:40:38 PM »
 ReplyReply
It doesn't seem to work on the spins that I've looked at.
Logged
"Who ya jivin' with that Cosmik Debris?"
F.Z.
winkel
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 06, 2009, 03:56:39 PM »
 ReplyReply
Quote from: hoper35 on July 05, 2009, 06:40:38 PM
It doesn't seem to work on the spins that I've looked at.

The solution that ended up in that bet-selection is funny.

But I see a good start for another thinking about probabilities.
That´s all.

br
winkel
Logged
Proofreaders2000
Guest
« Reply #6 on: July 06, 2009, 06:26:11 PM »
 ReplyReply
I'm inclined to believe if the dealer spins from the same place each time then the 1.666 rule may apply.  Good starting point for physics/advantage play.
Logged
Lohnro
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 471


Giddy Up!!!
« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2009, 04:32:56 AM »
 ReplyReply
Here is a spreadsheet I have made for this bet. It is very primitive, but I am sure it is correct. Any errors, let me know.

Cheers,
* Cracking Pi.xls (151.5 KB - downloaded 36 times.)
Logged
"So I will go my own way, do my own thing and give no thought to either applauders or the rotten egg throwers."
- TwoCatSam

Learn how to develop an effective roulette strategy: Learn the truth about beating roulette, and exactly why most roulette strategies fail. Save yourself time and effort. If you understand what roulette is, and what others have tried extensively, you'll know what can and cannot work before developing your roulette strategy. Also see roulette strategy reviews before buying any system or cheating device.

Genuine Winning Roulette System: learn to use the physics of the roulette wheel to win consistently. These are the only techniques that concern casinos. Many casinos hire professional consultants to advise them about professional roulette system players.

Play roulette for a living: Pay $0.00 up-front for a roulette computer to beat roulette, and pay only 50% of your winnings. Test it all you like before risking a cent. We do not "sell" these devices anymore - they are FREE to partners. The risk is all ours. The devices are legal apply in many jursidictions, but application is still completely hidden and covert because casinos do not tolerate consistent winners, regardless of how winnings are achieved.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
« previous next »
Jump to: