Hello guys,
During the last months I tryed to create my own bet selection method to bet on 2 dozens.
At the same time I looking for how to addapt LW registry to this method.
In my tests all going from bad to worse

-my method doesn't seems to be good enough.
But yesterday ,I did a test from Hamburg 620 actuals and there are the results
zerro-16
L-233
W-371
If I will bet each spin 2 units covering 2 dozens I will win 371 units and lost 498 units.
So ,its seems using my selection isnt the right way .
After this I checked the result using LW-flat bet.The results are:
Lw- 42 loss,78 wins -6 units
LLw- 17 loss,21 wins -13 units
Lww- 24 loss,79 wins +31 units
So using these 3 patterns we will be on +12 units
I like the idea to use more than one patern ,coz in my early tests ,some perform good ,some not and using all of them we stay protected from big drawdowns.
After this I continued to look in this registry ,trying to find another good performing pattern.
And the next is very interesting.
I deceide to start hunting for L`s
I devide all 620 spins on 614 groups.Each group content 7 spins.Most of the cases an L occure in this 7spins gruops.In fact only in 20 groups there arent L`s .In all other 594 groups there are minimum one L.
this impressed me a lot -96.7% from the cases an L occure in my selection.
I did a quick test -to bet after 3w using progression 1-1-2-3 and to bet after 4w using the same progression.
-7 units on L,and +1 or 2 units om W
the results are :
after 3W +50 units
after 4W +37 units
Guys pls pay attention on my idea .I thing there is something .All the times I learned from you .all that I know about roulette is from this amazing forum .
I preffer to use flat bets ,but using soft progression like 1-1-2-3 is not too scary and performs well when needs to recover.
And I know too ,that 600 spins is not enought .Thats why I share my idea with you .If you can check this idea in your spins data ,will be good.
Please excuise me about my english .I hope that you`ll understand what I mean

Best regards
SpensX