N6, I take it this means you are not interested in testing the software?

Matt

coming soon to a live dealer near you...
Matt

Thanx for updating Sam 

Dear Twocat.

Looking at the pattern of the graph line, no way that is a flat betting system. I don't in any way want to offend u! But from my point of view the graph is behaving abnormal for flat bets. And I will tell u why. The profit indicated by the line is not always the same (wich is a strong indicator for a flat betting system). I know there are different bets with different profits and that even with a flat betting system profits don't always have to be the same, but the variance is too swingy. There are also a lot of falls and those have different lengts indicating a different betsize. 2 reasons to believe some sort of progression is used.

I hope we can politely debate about it. I can only advise others to do the same.

Kind Regards,
Skrizy.

Here is my guess...  When using flat bets, on a win or loss, the appearance on the BR balance graph will have an angle to it.  That angle will be slightly tilted to the right and be going up or down.  Then, between bets there is a flatline, and then again, on a win or loss it either goes up or down with an angle tilting slightly to the right.

However, any BR balance graph has to "compact" that graph as it gets "deeper" into the amount of spins it has to graph.

So, at spin 20 the angle of the br balance graph line will be easily visible on a win or loss.

At spin 1000, it will be less visible.

At spin 10000, even less so.

At spin 1,000,000 what happens is that any angle is almost imperceptible.  So, what happens is if there are two, three, four, even five wins in a row using flat betting, and they are all done back to back (or very close to back to back) the balance graph will have no way of showing any "angle". 

What I mean is, it will look like the graph shot up 5 units all in one win...when in fact it took five wins to get it.

Open up rxtreme and flat bet for 20 spins.  Make yourself win 5 times in a row, don't bet for 5 spins, then lose 5 times in a row, then don't bet for 5 spins, then just win in a chop sequence back and forth.

Then, let RXtreme run for 1,000,000 spins...even 100,000 spins and then go back and look at the BR balance graph again.

You'll see it begins to look more and more like you got those 5 wins all in one shot...same goes for the losses.

You'll also see those 5 spins you went in between without betting become almost invisible on the graph.

I believe that graph is flat betting...if you do what I've said, you will too.

Here is that same graph, but at 7k spins:   (you'll see it looked like I won, then lost 5 units all at the same time)

I will be happy to answer any questions I can.

First, this is not my idea and none of the things in the program are my ideas.  I could not explain AI to you if my life depended on it.  Tiago has explained it thoroughly and I will readily admit--I simply cannot grasp it. 

As to the graph, Matt is the one who made it with 1,300,000 spins he has.  He is the one who says it is flat betting.  I truly believe him as I have his 1,300,000 spins and could check it.  By the way, he posted something once I could not believe so I asked for the spins.  He sent them and I ran the test robot.  Exactly, to the penny, the same results on two different settings.

Frankly, I do not understand hot sectors as hot sectors are part of a wheel and RNG has no wheel.  I think they just had to call it something.

As for myself personally I do not use hot sectors, sectors or AI, although I do test about 4,000 to 5,000 spins per day with AI.  Whatever it is and whatever it does, it is most impressive.  By the end of July I should have something like 150,000 spins cataloged into trots of from 900 to 4,000 spins each.  I plan to do a complete study on them with different settings and report.  Perhaps I should publish that here.

I am using a feature that was one of the very first in the bot.  I found it to be quite trustworthy and am happy to continue to play real money with it.  I have learned to use Victor's "tram" idea and when I see I am on a negative tram, I pause the bot and wait for two hours.  While each number is randomly selected, the tram will often go from negative to positive and then onward to my goal. 

RNG numbers, or at least those from Bet Voyager, follow very identifiable trends.  Consider the numbers produced as tiny drops of white paint.  Now consider them arranging themselves into a shape--a cat for example.  That's this trot; the next trot may be a dog. 

Sam