Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: VB question.What im doing wrong?  (Read 1871 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Angel
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 18



« on: February 04, 2010, 06:20:31 PM »
ReplyReply

Lets say that the wheel performs a full cirlcle in 4 sec, the ball rolls from my observation point and I have number 5 and with the next roll I have number 30.Αs I realize from a vid I saw here.Im counting the distance between those numbers(3 pockets) and I multiply with 4.Then im going again to my first number (5) and I count 12 pockets from the side the wheel spins.The result (25) is my bet.

Where is my mistake?Please answer.
Thanks
Logged
Davey-Jones
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 260



« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2010, 07:22:24 PM »
ReplyReply

Not sure I understand your explanation.
Logged

Absit reverentia vero
GARNabby
Guest

« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2010, 09:07:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Not sure I understand your explanation.

Not sure I'd undertand the answer.
Logged
Angel
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 18



« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2010, 09:17:06 AM »
ReplyReply

I dont think I can explain it better.Which part you cannot understand?
Logged
Bebediktus
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 11



« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2010, 09:46:12 AM »
ReplyReply

If You want to get normal answer must formulate question properly . at least three persons including me not understand what you wrote. Do inference.
Logged
Kelly
Roulette Physics
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


Productive Contributor


WWW
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2010, 11:00:02 AM »
ReplyReply

What you ask has nothing to do with traditional  VB play, it sounds more like one of foresters methods, maybe if you link to the description you talk about we might be wiser.
Logged
Angel
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 18



« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2010, 03:46:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Roulette visual prediction, free E2 system


Its the same video from topic "ZerodoomE2 VB system".
Logged
Kelly
Roulette Physics
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


Productive Contributor


WWW
« Reply #7 on: February 05, 2010, 04:21:47 PM »
ReplyReply

Jep thats forester.  Can`t help you since I can`t see why it should work. But its probably just me who haven`t deceifered  the explanation correct.
Logged
Angel
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 18



« Reply #8 on: February 05, 2010, 04:51:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Jep thats forester.  Can`t help you since I can`t see why it should work. But its probably just me who haven`t deceifered  the explanation correct.

You say it doesn't work.I dont know,maybe you are right.
Can you tell me the basic steps to start with VB?
Logged
Kelly
Roulette Physics
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


Productive Contributor


WWW
« Reply #9 on: February 06, 2010, 04:45:20 AM »
ReplyReply

I just  don`t see the logic since there are too many "look alike" mixed variables that can lead to different results as I understand the system.  But it can easyli be me who has misunderstood the system, so I have just put it on "hold" until someone drops a understandable explanation whith a good logic.

When I wrote on foresters forum there were plenty of discussions on traditional VB  that forester calls "estimation" and I don`t have the time to rewrite the entire thing again so your best bet is to extract what I have written on "Uwes" method on foresters board. Uwes method is basicly laurances system transferred to slower wheels with the cross bar on top (french models)(not the girls).

Just be carefull with pattern play such as 4X or 3X or 2X, I would always recommend learning to define a certain ball speed with the eyes/head count/thumper/accoustic instead of patterns, unless you really understand how the patterns develop and how 2 equal looking patterns might develop differently (tight, wide, weird....etc) which in the end might lead to different  fall off points.

Using a thumper or a head count, you can define a specific ball speed this way:
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4522/mgmball1lg3.jpg
VB question.What im doing wrong?



Picture source: Pierre Basieux, Roulette HardCore & Software, Algorithmen

You see that the thump (beep) at 2 and 3 ball revoloution  is occurring at the same spot, which means that if for example you have the thumper set at 60 BPM (1 sec) the ball is at a speed where it takes exactly 1 sec to make a full revoloution. Don`t pay too much attention to that it is called 2 and 3 beep, it could take maybe 8 - 12 revoloutions  or more before the ball reaches stage 2 and 3.

I would never use a thumper (anymore) in the casino but practise at home counting ABC1......ABC1....... or "Missisipi" until I got I rock solid feeling for 60 BPM. If you play where there are relatively early  call for no more bets, it might be a good idea to develop a feeling for 70 BPM and use same procedure.


Its a longer story to define where to look and how to track, but try search GG or foresters board on what I have written.
Logged
Kelly
Roulette Physics
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


Productive Contributor


WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2010, 05:01:21 AM »
ReplyReply

Here Pierre Basieux shows how you can use the 60 BPM to define a 3 second rotor speed.

http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/4139/mgmrotorjm5.jpg
VB question.What im doing wrong?


Picture source: Pierre Basieux

Note that it takes 3 seconds of the entire running time to measure this, if you don`t have the time you might go for a shorter version where for example you only use 2 beep/thumps. At a 3 second rotor you would have either number 13 or 14 at the second beep. You might even develop a 1 second measure, just notice that if you cut from the entire full rotor revoloution to maybe 1/3 or 2/3, your measures are more likely to be inaccuate depending on how much you have practiced
Logged
Angel
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 18



« Reply #11 on: February 06, 2010, 06:09:35 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you for your reply Kelly.It seems that you are supporting this section members more than the mods.
Thank you again.I hope to manage with VB.
Logged
Kelly
Roulette Physics
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


Productive Contributor


WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 06, 2010, 08:19:42 AM »
ReplyReply

Yeah well, I only have interest in this section. No matter who owns the forum, I will participate in a debate if it involves something im interested in.  The only board I really dropped out of, is foresters. Because I don`t like the way he twists things you say beyond recognition.  Don`t know what his issues is, and don`t care, I just stay away. I once praised Jafco for his good illustrations and fairly good explanations on basic VB play, I also wrote that if it was me, I would have used the easy wheel for explanation purposes and a more diffycult Cammegh as case project.  He turned that into that I have said that it was a fantastic good method etc. critizising just about everything about it.

But I will support all other boards if something interesting turns up, but I don`t see it as substitute for real life as Spike appears to do. Apparently he thinks that Steve will have to lie down and die on the spot because some members flee.

What the hell, its only a message board.  In my book im more concerned about the state of my snow shovel than the rules and behaviour on a message board.

Logged
Davey-Jones
Excellent Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 260



« Reply #13 on: February 06, 2010, 01:30:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Nicely put.  Thumbs up
Logged

Absit reverentia vero
Bo0Merang
Guest

« Reply #14 on: February 06, 2010, 04:37:38 PM »
ReplyReply

well said  Kelly but it is  not that  easy how you said --there is not that much members  how you can  think and there is  most of time wery poor  explanation some  sort of thinks which  actualy play  big role so Huh? what is the reason being here and waiting when the man get  joke and s...ts on  our heads just for his own  EGO what is the reason been  here anyway  being hacker is much better  becouse  otters  hackers  will realy  learn  you  something  but exconmen rouletteplayer will teach you nothing more then been  conman...  the other paople show lots of effort but for what ??FOR NOTHING   btw-nice explanation VB!!
Logged

Win at Roulette Consistently: beat roulette by understanding the physics of the wheel. These are the only techniques that concern casinos. Many casinos hire professional consultants to advise them about professional roulette players.

Free roulette computers: Pay $0.00 up-front for a roulette computer, and pay only 50% of your winnings. Test it all you like before risking a cent. We do not "sell" these devices anymore - they are FREE to partners. The risk is all ours. The devices are legal apply in many jursidictions, but application is still completely hidden and covert because casinos do not tolerate consistent winners, regardless of how winnings are achieved.

Free Roulette Tips: Learn why most roulette systems fail. Save yourself time and effort. If you understand what roulette is, and what others have tried, you'll know what can and cannot work before developing your roulette strategy. Also see roulette system reviews before buying any system or cheating device.

Pages: [1] 2 Next   Go Up
Print
Jump to:  


Related Topics
Subject Started by Replies Views Last post
I Could Be Wrong?
General Board
CHOUND 1 309 Last post November 15, 2007, 07:50:38 PM
by Advantage.Player
RIGHT AND WRONG
General Board
ChipChip 3 232 Last post November 30, 2008, 10:30:42 PM
by TwoCatSam
What is wrong with this? lol
Humor: Jokes, Funny Quotes & Stories, and more...
Mr J 10 735 Last post June 02, 2009, 10:14:54 AM
by Sealine
If there is an over-pay or a wrong pay-out think twice before you except it. « 1 2 »
Main Roulette Board
lucky_strike 29 1214 Last post September 24, 2009, 05:44:53 PM
by Davey-Jones
Something Wrong With Quote Tags?
General Board
bombus 2 210 Last post November 20, 2009, 04:34:55 AM
by Tangram