Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Please tell me what you think of these systems

Started by know when to quit, June 11, 2009, 02:50:32 AM

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

catalyst

hi seykid
dont be a selfish Dracula. come out of the darkness, fly under the full moon and express your understanding of KWTQ.
THANKS
CATALYST

catalyst

Quote from: catalyst on March 29, 2011, 11:23:36 AM
hi seykid
dont be a selfish Dracula. come out of the darkness, fly under the full moon and express your understanding of KWTQ.
THANKS
CATALYST

hi forum members

dont be darkseekers. with KWTQ in hybernation, we need someone with good understanding of this thread to come out and claim the life of this thread.

catalyst

seykid29

Catalyst,i play only Airball..i have add KWTQ insights to my game,and still adding..what i can say i find it much better to place 1-36 then track ,instead wheel order.Then as numbers repeat they will cluster with another repeat.So putting spins in group of 6 is a good idea.Sorry its hard to explain,but im still learning also. Cheers Seykid.

catalyst

Quote from: seykid29 on April 05, 2011, 02:32:20 PM
Catalyst,I play only Airball..I have add KWTQ insights to my game,and still adding..what I can say I find it much better to place 1-36 then track ,instead wheel order.Then as numbers repeat they will cluster with another repeat.So putting spins in group of 6 is a good idea.Sorry its hard to explain,but im still learning also. Cheers Seykid.

hi Seykid
at first thanks for your comeback.
so you are suggesting to follow the tableorder instead of wheelorder for tracking. then making of group of 6 repeat numbers. for example, 2, 32, 4, 16, 9, and 25 are repeat numbers. we add more repeat numbers to them and find out cluster of six numbers which are close to each other according to the board numbers (could be in 1st or 2nd or 3rd dozen. am i right?
thanks
catalyst

seykid29

Catalyst
You already have the basic idea Mate,work on that.Study your spins..apply what you already know..test it..test it.
Im sure you will stumble upon another method..your own style.

know when to quit

Hello all,

Just an update that I wanted to post.....have been playing many many times refining my way of play. Made back all that I lost and much much more. Please continue working with what I call the exponential curve...there is definately something to this.

JJh

seykid29

So It figures understanding the Curve is the real Gem.
Seykid.

catalyst

Quote from: know when to quit on April 09, 2011, 10:38:06 PM
Hello all,

Just an update that I wanted to post.....have been playing many many times refining my way of play. Made back all that I lost and much much more. Please continue working with what I call the exponential curve...there is definately something to this.

JJh


HI KWTQ
thanks for your contribution in this thread. many of us got basic or more understanding of your exponential curve. but a bit more contribution using exponential curve with few more spins could enhance our understanding quiet rapidly. from time to time if you just put a small paragraph in this thread explaining your different pattern of play, the forum members will be greatly benefitted.

your explanations are greatly appreciated.

happy hunting.
thanks
catalyst

dio

Looking forward to further work with the exponential curve.

Best

Dio.

seykid29

Must say,with 500 units bank,aiming for 100 units this system is still afavorite of mine,played the original way,largest gap,then close and close gap.But i track linear 1-36,not wheel.As this way i find ,despite what others will say,it is better as a way of randomness,as i play just Airball and mechanical as it is,can hit large sectors one after another,so playing wheel base is not that favorable for me..my view.But thsi sysem sure wins.Slowly but surely. :dance1:

jrhelp007

seykid29,

can you please go over a session supplying roulette spins and how the method a actually works. Including the curve.

Thanks you for helping us out as well.

John

Antibet

Quote from: know when to quit on April 09, 2011, 10:38:06 PM
Hello all,

Just an update that I wanted to post.....have been playing many many times refining my way of play. Made back all that I lost and much much more. Please continue working with what I call the exponential curve...there is definately something to this.

JJh

\Try using light blue it makes more sense

seykid29

Quote from: jrhelp007 on July 01, 2011, 12:28:00 PM
seykid29,

can you please go over a session supplying roulette spins and how the method a actually works. Including the curve.

Thanks you for helping us out as well.

John
im playing it like the original.Tracking 1-36,then playing largest gap,maximum 10 numbers.On airball they do hit.Then i find the next largest gap.And work from there.But at times when playing,eg. the twenties 20-29 they havent hit for a while,when they do hit i let it run for 2 hits more which they normally do.This things is hard to explain with spins.It comes a little from experience of play and knowing how your wheel behave (airball) as for the graph also,not easy to put on paper.Still learning to adapt.KWTQ has given a lot to work upon i guess.Cheers.
Seykid.

tjmcnich

Anyone using this system? I understand it.. the only thing I dont understand is what to play... after 36 spins am I playing the Hot streaks? The Cold Streaks? etc.... What I've been doing is playing the last 6 numbers that were just spun.

Here Are The Spins
3
13
24
12
12
11
0
2
4
19

I would bet 1 chip on each (19-4-2-0-11-12)

Spin: 8 comes up... Lost

Now I would bet 1 chip on (8-19-4-2-0-11)

The bet progression goes like this

1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,4,4... If I go 11 spins with all losses I stop. It's worked very well so far... This is on LIVE tables playing with make money.

jrhelp007

know when to quit, where are you?

You last access was on August 18. If you read this post will provide us with the latest status on your method.

Thanks,

John

jrhelp007

-