TurboGenius (4 number method)

[hermes]

We got forwards thanks to bloomone, Krash and MJP 78. The idea of MJP 78 is very universal and interesting. I tried the 4 best streets and you are right bloomone it need lot of spins to decide which one are to play but it is different if you mark the most coming dozen. Mostly in 12 spins you know the winner. It is rewarding. I will test the MJP's approach with my progression.
Krash, what's wrong with paper and pen? I didn't think bring a young secretary with you, just prepared form and pen. It is allowed in all casinos to use. We have to lower the stress during the game and keep good bookkeeping. It is funny but I never got to -50 during testing on live roulette numbers. I have to find some difficult one next time. Good sign is that everybody is winning with that system.
Hermes

[bloomone2002]

HI Bloom thanks for the welcome!

Looking at my results now if i just recorded on paper till the first repeat then started betting things look like they would have gone better in game 3 ...think i'l test it that way some more... thanks

As for the 4 sectors im still working on improving the progression and a different way to play the numbers should be done soon!

Cheers mate.

MJP

Wow, you're right that, looks better. Each session would be a plus unit gain
Bloom

[bloomone2002]

HI Bloom thanks for the welcome!

Looking at my results now if i just recorded on paper till the first repeat then started betting things look like they would have gone better in game 3 ...think i'l test it that way some more... thanks

As for the 4 sectors im still working on improving the progression and a different way to play the numbers should be done soon!

Cheers mate.

MJP

MJP, I did one session with both of your variations. Your original variation was a significant grind with a drawdown high of -253.
The 2nd proposed version faired better, but still needs some touch-up somewhere. I noticed where spin 8 and 9 cancelled each other. I'm sure not I following all your rules here. I would be interested in any improvement ideas.

MJP Turbo Neighbors System Test
Session 1: table 3, 1/8/08
MJP's first method
1,      1                                    -1
2      3                                    -3
3      29                                    -6
4      28                                    -10
5      13                                    -15
6      32                                    -21
7      4                                    -28
8      6      c13+2                              -36
9      13      c6+3                              -54
10      2      c4+4                              -84
11      15      c32+5                              -128
12      10                                    -188
13      1      r, (1,3,29,28,2,15,10)+1            -253+180= -73
14      4      c2, (1,3,29,28,15,10,4)+2            -7
15      13      (1,3,29,28,15,10,4)+2                  -21
16      18      c29, (1,3,28,15,10,4,18)+3            -35
17      9      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9)+3            -56
18      11      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9,11)+3            -80
19      3      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9,11)+3, h3      -107+108= 1u-73= -72


MJP Turbo Neighbors System Test
Session 1: table 3, 1/8/08
MJP new method

1,      1
2      3
3      29
4      28
5      13
6      32
7      4
8      6      c13+2
9      13      c6+3
10      2      c4+4
11      15      c32+5
12      10      
13      1      r, (1,3,29,28,2,15,10)+1      
14      4      c2, (1,3,29,28,15,10,4)+2            -7
15      13      (1,3,29,28,15,10,4)+2                  -21
16      18      c29, (1,3,28,15,10,4,18)+3            -35
17      9      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9)+3            -56
18      11      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9,11)+3            -80
19      3      (1,3,28,15,10,4,18,9,11)+3, h3      -107+108= 1u
20      10
Bloom

[cps10]

I like the idea of playing each dozen separately yet simultaneously. I wonder if there is a way to incorporate a progression on the overall betting total to guarantee a win on a hit. Could be a bit tough though.

[TwoCatSam]

Keith

That's a good idea.  The most numbers one could have working is twelve.  But you're right....it would take a computer program to keep track of how much to bet.   Hmmmm.......or maybe not!!

Sam

[cps10]

Sam

I don't think the tracking would be too difficult. A white erase board might be better though! LOL

[bloomone2002]

Maybe a mini laminated layout, where you use an erasable marker, might do the trick.

[cps10]

That's kind of what I was thinking as well. It could be done. All you need to do is have the numbers out there and just "dot" them as they come up. And erase the street when they are eliminated.

[bloomone2002]

I like the idea of playing each dozen separately yet simultaneously. I wonder if there is a way to incorporate a progression on the overall betting total to guarantee a win on a hit. Could be a bit tough though.

So are you proposing to have up to 4 separate progression, D1, D2, D3 and overall? If so, how would we setup an overall progression?
Bloom

[TwoCatSam]

cp

I tried the grease pencil or dry erase pen and they work well if you keep your hand off them while writing.  I get sloppy and smudge things up a bit.  Still a workable idea.

bloom

I'd like a progression which pays my previous loses + my bets that lose on the winning bet and still return a profit.  Something like: Total loss + current bet/35 or so.

Sam

[cps10]

@ bloom - I was thinking of an overall progression. I'm sure it could be done, but it could get complicated. You may need a chart just to see how much you have lost overall and divide by 36 to get your next play.

@ sam - I was thinking the same thing. If you got a pre-printed board of numbers, it would be easier for sure.

[bloomone2002]

Well  maybe you could use your br in chips on the table as an indicator.

starting br of 500u
section your br chips into 5 groups of 100
whenever you lose a stack you divide 100/36=approx. 3u
Add 3u to each betting games existing bet levels.
Bloom

[cps10]

Not a bad idea...will have to think about that a little.

[TwoCatSam]

Gentlemen.........

I need something that doesn't force me to think.  That is why on the systems that always worked for me (Gamlet and VLS) there was nothing to think about--just count or read.

As I've said, I'm a bit ADD and I will sit there with my head in the clouds when I should be thinking.

Sam

[cps10]

I agree with you Sam. I would like to know how to capitalize on this phenomenon.

[cps10]

-