How To Beat Roulette

[Spike]

Hone your guessing skills on a daily basis till you're winning more than losing. Continue practicing till you're winning a lot more than you're losing. Thats pretty much it in a nutshell.

You're welcome.

[J.Daniels]

Hi spike,

Practicing what, how to guess more times right than wrong?, thats sounds pretty hard to me without any based rules.
Can I ask you if you have some selection criterion?

JD

[Spike]

There are no rules with random numbers. As soon as you think there are, you're sunk. Confusing, isn't it.

[Toothpaste]

Why confusing? There are rules with random, they are just not so solid. Only change is permanent, thats the basic rule.

[pins]

the maths say you will guess wrong more times then you will guess right.

[Moccoman]

Hi Spike,

I just want to know if you have been talking to my girlfriend?

I played just 66 spins on Sat**day night, with the GF by my side.

She didn't say much because I was "doing my thing". Anyway, on about half a dozen occasions she said, after I had placed my bet, that it would be the opposite colour, and on all bar one occasion she was right!

The kicker is that only 2 times she said:

"I think the next number will be 11" - and it was and then some 10 spins later said "Gee zero hasn't come out for a while" and that spin was the green!!

Then at the end of the night I asked her to look at some of the marquees and tell me when the next colour would be, and she got 4 out of 5 right!

I guess some have it, and some don't.

Mocco

[xman1970]

Marry that girl RIGHT now Mocco 

[Spike]

I just want to know if you have been talking to my girlfriend?>>

Talking? No, we seldom do any real talking. Once in awhile she says 'Thank you'. Does that count as 'talking'?

[Lanky]

Marry that girl RIGHT now Mocco 

Hhahahahahaha...Lmao @ Xman.

Good One Mate.

Lanky.

[GARNabby]

There are no rules with random numbers. As soon as you think there are, you're sunk. Confusing, isn't it.

Einstein ran into the same basic problem with his "Theory of Relativity": if there are no absolutes, then that, itself, can't be an absolute theory.

And teachers teach rules and theories, which puts you in the same league (, if only on that point)... leaving you with the question, "How to discard the rules (of science) after having properly acquired those?"

Not confusing at all!

[gizmotron]

Hi spike,

Practicing what, how to guess more times right than wrong?, thats sounds pretty hard to me without any based rules.
Can I ask you if you have some selection criterion?

JD

I do. I check for dominances of single or doubles in the last spin and the past several spins beyond that. I check it against several groups & group sizes. I do this to watch which one is working the best. I then guess that it will continue to work in my next bet. This is where I must practice getting good at it. I know that some trends will end but I also know that some will continue for a few spins. I also know that some will continue for an hour or two. If you practice to see what is working then you will be able to figure out how to exploit it best too. It all comes down to guessing after determining what is happening.

[GARNabby]

It all comes down to guessing after determining what is happening.

Better to just surmise what will (likely) happen next... sacrifice some of the "determining" for some of the "guessing"?

[gizmotron]

Better to just surmise what will (likely) happen next... sacrifice some of the "determining" for some of the "guessing"?

I respectfully disagree. It's best to know exactly what happened recently and to know how that applies to seeking the best of the few opportunities presenting themselves. It's difficult to surmise what will likely happen when you know that randomness presents three states, working very well, working very bad and ending, and chop. I always know what will happen that way. I'm guessing on finding the opportunity that continues the exact same thing I'm seeing as productive. It's important to know what is happening. It's possible to determine independent of guessing and to be very good at both.

[hideseek]

Give spike his own section. So that we can read all  his teachings at one place.

[GARNabby]

... randomness presents three states, working very well, working very bad and ending, and chop. I always know what will happen that way. I'm guessing on finding the opportunity that continues the exact same thing I'm seeing as productive. It's important to know what is happening. It's possible to determine independent of guessing and to be very good at both.

Giz,

Okay, sounds like your defintions, of 'determine' and 'guessing', are each already crossing over into the other.

The most important fundamental implication of the rule-but-not concept I tried to present above is that randomness is essentially "flawed"... a state of guessing but not guessing, the latter (, not guessing,) because we're making a rule of it (, the guessing).  Hence there must be some way to exploit that much more than by, eg, VB... on some underlaying mathematical/physical level.  Specifically, a level which somehow puts the guessing onto the not guessing, one definition onto the other.

Second, you write of continuance... but intuitively, outcomes may equally have the "tendency" to revert, to even out (after being brought to some point of disequilibrium of dominance/streaking).  So why not try for both at once... eg, the roulette outcomes from the last, say 20 to 40 spins?   Instead of the next-to-last, or the numbers which haven't appeared in a very long time.  (In baccarat, this is akin to following up PPBB with BBPP.)  

[GARNabby]

-