Head count with stop-watch

[I have cookies]

nolinks://nolinks.online-stopwatch.com/ pick left stopwatch and post your results here.

Cheers

[lucky_strike]

I test to say 1 to 10 very fast and try to get 1.2

1.202
1.279
1.423
1.197
1.781
1.200
1.177
1.401
1.124
1.407

Well i want better so i test 1 to 9 to get 1.2

1.10
1.170
1.218
1.117
1.90
1.206
1.120
1.91
1.87
1.186

[lucky_strike]

Will test tune "melodi" and see if it is better then numbers...

Cheers

[lucky_strike]

hiphop1

1.267
1.150
1.93
1.182
1.134
1.154
1.34
1.138
1.348
1.83

Cheers

[Kelly]

Just a quick hello from London.
Its  good training but i think you need a lot of timing training to get consistent with the mouse start and stop.  You can lose a lot of fractions in the readings by not hitting correct start and stop. But after a while you know with yourself when you are "getting there".

[I have cookies]

You can lose a lot of fractions in the readings by not hitting correct start and stop.

Yes I notice that and even that you adjust with your eyes.
Now I have closed eyes and click then count then stop and look at the result.

1.281 .
1.203 .
1.16
1.360 .
1.296 .
1.532
1.234 .
1.78
1.203 .
1.329 .

7 nice ones out of 10...

Is 100ms errors.
That has to be a good thing, right?


Cheers

[Kelly]

100 ms errors is a lot if you put them into a computer. A VB player identify a specific ball revoloution by a mix of headcount and gut feeling. The gut feeling comes from the decelleration difference betwen ball revoloutions. As Kaisan puts it: "I don`t time the ball, i KNOW when i am in the right revoloution". Which pretty much covers it. The feeling will gradually emerge after a long while.

Personally i DO miss the right revoloution from time to time, but its also a rare thing to me. But im 15 years after Kaisan, so i tell myself im excused. Forester will call it estimation but it has nothing to do with estimation. We know when we are in the right revoloution and we know which number will be below the ball when the ball strikes with the slack of difference you can get from say 9 sec. running time. With the scatter we face on the Cammeghs, the ball will have a high probability area of 9 - 12 pockets anyway, so if we are 1 - 2 pockets to either side wrong, we still face a pretty scary randomisation when the ball hits the frets.

100 ms error might give you trouble in the first 300 training spins when finding the right revoloution, but it will be replaced with a much more accurate gut feeling later on.

[Kelly]

-