6 point Divisor Plan

[Lanky]

Hey Lanky me old mate I gots a question for you as well well two actually howyou going with your hybrid strategy incorpoorting divisor and Marvens plan and also with your usage of the divisor methods has it ever got out of hand where you had to abandon a run and if not what is the highest bet you have had to go to on sy the 2 dozens or even the EC bets thanks in advance mate


Regard Rodney

Rodney My Mate.

As You Know from our phone call the other day I am Busier then a Lizard Drinking Mate.

The hybrid thing between Marven's and the Divisor is on Hold at least for 2 weeks or more or even twice as long as that it will be so until I sort out things with Mum.

Yes Mate as You Know no one can Win every session so I am no different I have lost 5 sessions over the last 2 years +.

Thanks for the Phone call the other day Cobber.

Good OnYa mate.

Lanky.

[Lanky]

Hi lanky..

Can you help me on how to apply 6 point devisor on this.. ...

Example: the liability if I lose is 50% of my bet. (example: I place a usd 20 to win 20 but if I lose, I only lose usd 10.)

I ned a good progression (not a explosive progression)


Please kindly suggest me a good progression..

StarStar.

Mate Check Your PM box.

Lanky.

[Natural9]

Rodney My Mate.

As You Know from our phone call the other day I am Busier then a Lizard Drinking Mate.

The hybrid thing between Marven's and the Divisor is on Hold at least for 2 weeks or more or even twice as long as that it will be so until I sort out things with Mum.

Yes Mate as You Know no one can Win every session so I am no different I have lost 5 sessions over the last 2 years +.

Thanks for the Phone call the other day Cobber.

Good OnYa mate.

Lanky.

Hey Lanky Me mate how you doing
Are you able to update us  on your hybrid thingy with Mavens staking plan I know you been busy with life in General so maybe you not got back to it tc mate
Regards Rodney

[Lanky]

Hey Lanky Me mate how you doing
Are you able to update us  on your hybrid thingy with Mavens staking plan I know you been busy with life in General so maybe you not got back to it tc mate
Regards Rodney

Hi Rod.

No sorry Mate I can't find a way to carry the Zero or the Zero pocket bet with Marv's Way.

So I will stay with what I have.

Lanky.

[hot vegas night]

Where is this hybrid located?  I can not find it.

[Lanky]

Where is this hybrid located?  I can not find it.

Hi Mate.

There was never one done by Me.

As I said in and for the same reason's in the Quote below.

Hi Rod.

No sorry Mate I can't find a way to carry the Zero or the Zero pocket bet with Marv's Way.

So I will stay with what I have.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[SmartGXL]

Hi Lanky,

I am curious, how would you adapt the 6-point Divisor Plan to a strategy hat has the following risk/reward ratio:

Risk: 1 Unit
Reward: 0. 66 Unit

I am trying to adapt this strategy to a Forex system that has a stop loss/take profit where you risk 1 unit, so if you lose, you lose one unit, but if you win, you win 0. 66 unit (in other words, the stop loss is 15 pips but the take profit is 10 pips).

Thanks mate for any help or advice you can provide!

-Christian

[Lanky]

Hi Lanky,

I am curious, how would you adapt the 6-point Divisor Plan to a strategy hat has the following risk/reward ratio:

Risk: 1 Unit
Reward: 0. 66 Unit

I am trying to adapt this strategy to a Forex system that has a stop loss/take profit where you risk 1 unit, so if you lose, you lose one unit, but if you win, you win 0. 66 unit (in other words, the stop loss is 15 pips but the take profit is 10 pips).

Thanks mate for any help or advice you can provide!

-Christian

Hi Christian.

Mate I really don't like to get involved with the Stock market or Forex with the Divisor...

I rarely do continue any conversation about it at all.....there are Brokers fees to take into account and the Divisor was not designed for that......Unless that Fee is going to be included in the Win target ...then I guess that could work.....but it might automatically mean that Your unit would have to be higher to accommodate such a thing.
(there is more involved then a straight out bet so You can see why I don't like it now)

However If I have got this right about what Your saying is that You Invest a $1 and if it goes up a Pip(whatever that is ) You get a return of $1.66 is that Correct.

Lanky.

[DOC]

Hi Lanky

I have a system and was wondering if the 6 point plan could be incorporated or perhaps a suitable progression system.
I Play 6 numbers at a time. My stats are
Hit on spin 1 = 17%
Hit on spin 2 = 17%
Hit on spin 3 = 10%
Hit on spin 4 = 10%
Hit on spin 5 = 9%
Hit on spin 6 = 7%
Hit on spin 7 = 4%
Hit on spin 8 = 7%
Hit on spin 9 = 4%
Hit on spin 10 = 3%
Spins exceeding 10 = 13%

I am toying with a progression system and a cut off after 5 spins, which means also having to make up the losses. Pay out of 35:1 less the 5 of 6 chips betted also needs to be factored in.

Any ideas or contributions would be most welcome

[Lanky]

Hi Mate .

On Single number betting I would use a 35/1 or a 36/1 Divisor.

My preference is for a 36/1 Divisor.

Which means to use a 36 Divisor with a (1) Win target.

I will do an example here for You My Friend...

With an 11 loss sequence Playing 6 numbers.

01-36/1=6=7 lost
02-36/7=6=13 lost
03-36/13=6=19 lost
04-36/19=6=25 lost
05-36/25=6=31 lost
06-36/31-6=37 lost   <<You would Break even Here if it had Won

Because it would be 37-36 back=1-(1) Win Target=Even

07-36/37=12=49 lost
08-36/49=12=61 lost
09-36/61=12=73 lost. << Same here You would be Even if it had Won
10-36/73=18=91 lost
11-36/91=18=109  << Same here if it Won You would be Even again.
12-36/109=24=133 Won-Less144 back=11+(1)={+12} Profit.

But what would happen if the 12th Bet lost the 13th Bet would look like this now.
13-36/133=24=157 Lost (And Had that WON it would now be –144= -13)

And You would require another win but it would be like this
14-36/13=6=19 Won –36 back= +17+(1)={+18} Profit

Of course at anytime You thought that the Bets were getting too high You could add another 36 Divisor.

Like say Your limit was a 36 Bet and that lost , lets say the 12th bet lost.
You could continue like this.

12-36/109=24=133 Lost
13-36/133=24=157 Lost
14-36/157=30=187 lost
15-36/187=36=223 lost

So if this were to happen Your next Bet rounded up would be 42
But You don't want to go past 36
So what You do is add another Divisor.
Like this.

16-72/223=24=247 Won-144=103 >>Divisor back to 36 Now.
17-36/103=18=121 Won-108=13
18-36/13=6=19 Won-36=17+(1)={+18} Profit.

By adding More Divisors the Bets remain lower but You will Require an extra Win or Two Mate.

In the end it will all come down to the Strike Rate of You Method (the more the better)
And also each individual players tolerance for higher Bets.

Also when to walk away taking as small a Loss as possible will always help.

MattyMattz and others Do/Have used this Similar type of Divisor in the past.

Maybe they would be so kind as to post some hints as to way they do things.

Well I have done My Best for You My Friend.

I have taken You to the 18th Bet with all different types of scenarios .

(Hopefully without Mistakes.....LoL)

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[DOC]

Thanks for the in depth reply

Regards

CHRIS

[rjeaton1]

I've got a casino near me (within 15 minutes) that has RNG roulette.  It is basically a giant plasma TV in the center of 12 seats.  On that screen an animated "dealer" spins a ball around an "animated" wheel.

I occasionally go there with my girlfriend for a couple of hours just for fun.  I don't use any system anymore when I go, but I do employ money management "methods".  I've been using "The Midas Touch" for awhile now (fails long term of course) but it keeps me at the table for awhile and sometimes pays for my drinks at least.

I'm interested in coding this 6 point divisor plan just to see how it does over the course of 1 or 2 hundred spins.  The thing is, when I code it I can only code it one one bet selection in mind.

Any suggestions on the bet selection I should use when I code it Lanky?

[kav]

Lanky thanks for your reply.
You are very helpful as always.
But I think it would be more easy to understand if you wrote it like 1/36 instead of 36/1.

[Lanky]

I'm interested in coding this 6 point divisor plan just to see how it does over the course of 1 or 2 hundred spins.  The thing is, when I code it I can only code it one one bet selection in mind.

Any suggestions on the bet selection I should use when I code it Lanky?

HI RJ.

Sorry for the Delayed reply Mate.

It depends on what Your going to code it for My Mate.

I will leave the Betting selection to You Cobber.....
You might want to Play the DBL or FLD as an Example on Evens....or the LD ,LC,JD,JC on the Dozens and Columns.

On Evens it will depend on if You are going to be aggressive or do it the Safer way like I have done in most of the examples with the 6 Pt Divisor.
And put it up on every 2 Losses and Down 1 on every Win.

Do the same if Your Betting either 2 Dozens or 2 Columns as Your Bet.

However If Your going to Bet on a Single Dozen or Column put it up 1 one every 4 Losses.

Your Friend .

Lanky.

[Lanky]

Lanky thanks for your reply.
You are very helpful as always.
But I think it would be more easy to understand if you wrote it like 1/36 instead of 36/1.

Hi Kav.

Thanks for the kind words My Friend.

However as to how I put the Divisor in My Posts are the exact same way as it was taught to Me out here in the Australian Schools.

Its the same as its done in England ......and after all Our Aussies ancestors were originally sent out Here by The English as convicts....so there fore We adopted their ways of doing things.
And thats how they said to do it and our ancestors obeyed......They had too they were in chains.........Lmao.

Those Guys sure knew what they were doing when they sent us out here in this beautiful sunshine.....LoL

We always Divide This way 36/1.

The American Influenced Countries do it the other way 1/36.<<<To us that would mean 1 into 36=36

Its back to front to us....But then again We think they drive on the wrong side of the Road as Well..........Lmao

Not all Cultures are the same My Friend.

Your Friend.

Lanky.

[Lanky]

-