Two unhit, side by side

[Mr J]

I have used this method 4 times live and have BEYOND GREAT results, that, you can quote me on. My NETS were $910, $980, $880, $1,250. Basically betting TWO UNHIT numbers, side by side on the wheel (double zero wheel for myself). My progression goes up to 55 steps. I usually start on the 00, 1 but it makes NO difference! Say the 17 hit, cross it off.  We now skip the next 2 spins (no betting) cross off whatever hit. Pick again 2 unhit numbers side by side on the wheel, base this on nothing please! No due numbers or hot or cold numbers etc., ONLY unhit numbers.

No win? Repeat the process. Skip 2 spins, bet, skip 2 spins, bet etc. On a win, start over fresh, nothing crossed off. NOTE: An example, lets say the 24 and 13 are crossed off. You must ALSO cross off the 36. The BEST case of dragging the progression is 165 spins, for TWO numbers! BUT, lets say I get down to the last two? We now do NO MORE skipping. Keep betting on those two for the rest of the progression. My average for that happening is once for every 7 wins. When that does happen, it drops from 165 to 135 total spins (my average).

So far, 135 POSSIBLE spins is my WORSE case situation. ANOTHER NOTE: Lets say the LAST unhit numbers are the 6 21 33. No more skipping spins. Alternate betting between the 6 21 and the 21 33. I use to play a similar method but why switch Ken? I did the same method for unhit splits on the layout. However, there were too many problems of too many possibilities left unhit. EXAMPLE: Lets say the last unhit numbers on the layout were >> 11 13 14 15 17. That 14 would screw everything up because it controlled the other 4 numbers for a split.

In total, thats 4 possible bets as opposed to NOW, (6 21 33), its only TWO. I feel it narrows it down MUCH easier. This might be my long term method (knock on wood) that I use, its very promising. The 2 downsides.... expensive BR and if roulette is not boring enough, we only bet 33% of the time. Using nickels for my progression, my NET wins are damn nice, worth the wait! Questions?  Ken

[Spike]

There can be no difference is these systems, they only appear different. 6 of one, half a dozen of the other, it all comes out the same in the end. It probably helps you psychologically to switch around, so from that standpoint its useful. They win when they win and don't when they don't. Math wise its all the same. One ball, one wheel, one random pocket at a time.

[Mr J]

I was waiting for you. Thank you for your OPINION sir.  Ken

[VLSroulette]

Thanks for sharing your system with us here Ken.

Hey! It is the "Full Systems" section, as long as the system is complete and not a "Hint and clues" thread, it stays for the fellow members to read; they are free to test, tweak and try it

Again: Thanks!
Victor

[Mr J]

And the best news.... I used paragraphs!  Ken

[Spike]

Thank you for your OPINION sir.>>>

I'm afraid its not opinion, its mathematical fact. Sorry..

[winkel]

Thank you for your OPINION sir.>>>

I'm afraid its not opinion, its mathematical fact. Sorry..

you are doing herb´s job, aren´t you?

[Spike]

If I'm wrong, please point out the real facts.

[winkel]

If I'm wrong, please point out the real facts.

you can be right, but obnoxious as well

Most people know about the house edge and the math going with it. You don´t need to say it in every bloody post you are writing

[Mr J]

There are just some that love saying "but your number might not hit, you could lose". Do I have to pull the ole Kenny move again? lol Backing posters into a corner asking THEM EXACTLY how they play? You ever notice, the ones that slam others the most ALSO reveal the LEAST how they play? Coincidence or only my imagination?  Ken

[Mr J]

Another note regarding this method >> I always say, TRIAL and ERROR, its the only way! Months ago, I use to play this same method EXCEPT for one thing, I did not skip spins, the progression went until 55.

Every other rule was the same. I randomly picked 2 unhits side by side etc. At best, the method did ok, NOTHING real good about it. On my losses, I would stick around and watch and jot down future numbers. Sure as heck, whatever unhit pairs I had.....7 spins later WIN, 28 spins later WIN, 53 spins later WIN etc.

I of course lost because the progression ended, thats how I came up with this. I have added on around 100 extra spins WITHOUT raising the progression itself.  Ken

[rjeaton1]

There are just some that love saying "but your number might not hit, you could lose". Do I have to pull the ole Kenny move again? lol Backing posters into a corner asking THEM EXACTLY how they play?

I actually stopped to read that post...and actually think about it.

When I read this method of yours, I too wanted to say (although I didn't) "Mr. J, there isn't anything that says your number is going to hit."

Then I thought about the second sentence of that quote above...  If I'm playing online (where trying to use VB isn't an option) there isn't any method that gives me (or anybody else) any better of a chance to win than what you're doing. 

If everybody took the road of "But your number/color/whatever might not hit", then nobody would ever play this game...or any other game for that matter.

If you had entitled this post or said at some point "This method is guaranteed to win" then everybody would have a right to jump on you.  But, you haven't done that.  You're simply saying "This is how I play, you can try it if you'd like."  I'm assuming you already know that your number may or may not hit, but you're choosing to play the game anyway.

Next time somebody goes to say something to you like "You're crazy, you very well could lose doing that" they should take two steps back and think about how they play.  Regardless of how they play (unless they're using some sort of advantage play) anybody could easily walk up to them and say the exact same thing "Hey, you know you might lose doing that" and they'd be right.

This game is simply that, a game.  And it is a gamble to play it no matter how you play it.

So all I have left to say to you now is congrats on your winnings, I hope they continue and thanks for sharing.

[MattyMattz]

I've played this method 5 times so far (3 live and twice online).  Why?  Because it's easy, and fun, and has worked so far.  Has won everytime. 

I'm not saying it will always win (infact I know it will lose), but I enjoy playing it while waiting for a poker table to open, and will continue playing it for the time being.

Thanks Ken,
Matt

[Mr J]

Nice comments, no problem.  Ken

[hammy]

There can be no difference is these systems, they only appear different. 6 of one, half a dozen of the other, it all comes out the same in the end. It probably helps you psychologically to switch around, so from that standpoint its useful. They win when they win and don't when they don't. Math wise its all the same. One ball, one wheel, one random pocket at a time.

REALLY !

What a profound statement !
On your next post , tell us something we don't already know, thanks !..

[hammy]

-