Re: Using.... your common sense......

[winkel]

If people talk together and try to find a common sense, they should use the same words and meanings. otherwise ther will be no common sense.

You are talking about the outcome and are listing it in a triangle way.
I'm talking about the possible decision probably following a certain outcome.



you are describing the way throug this decision-board.

i think i have to stop this discussion, when youre trying to make the mickey out of it.

[Carlitos]

............ sorry but i not trying to mickey you out....... doesn't the probality turn into an outcome? I think so..... however you do not know which probality otherwise you would know the outcome.......




But what produces the outcome.......? The probality does not pay you the rent.... because you do not know which one is coming up...... The outcome is an fact.






Carlitos  8-)

[winkel]

To discuss the way you do:

The outcome ist worth as much as yesterdays newspaper.

But if you look at my triangle you will see some facts, that are worth thinking about.

If you had an fair outcome THTHTHT....
You would go vertically down!!!!!
If there had been a row of "H" it seems to be forced to go back to the middle.

br
winkel

[Carlitos]

....... perhaps we have different views on this " common sense " section. Yah, but the outcome determines your payment ...... or not.......  





Carlitos  8-)

[winkel]

If there are different views on common sense, there is no common sense possible.

so I quit

[Carlitos]

You do not have to quit...... realy......





Carlitos  8-)

[TwoCatSam]

I like winke's triangle and copied it to Word before he has the chance to take it down.

People, I don't think I'm asking the question right.

Sorry...........

TwoCat

[winkel]

I like winke's triangle and copied it to Word before he has the chance to take it down.

That will follow me a while, I think. No need for this, TCS

People, I don't think I'm asking the question right.

Sorry...........

TwoCat

Questions can´t be wrong, only answers can be stupid.

br
winkel

[MXkid77]

I would just like to throw some ideas around, maybe somebody can add to this. I feel the secret has to be out there somewhere.

To me the most common thing to make sense would be to have two betting systems that cover half of the table each. (I am sure there is a decent mathematical system out there that covers half the table.)

Common sense tells me, play both of them on 1 table, at the same time. When 1 wins the other loses, and vise versa.

Mild progression??, long losing sessions on one bet are softened by the other bet winning??

Any idea's??

[bjb007]

I believe that any system which relies on only
one way of selecting bets or only one way of
selecting numbers bets will fail.

Using a number of systems and multiple selection
methods to filter the possibilities down to a
manageable number is the only chance of winning
consistently.

I've not heard of any system which covers only
half of the numbers but it's worth some
thought.  High/Low divides the numbers so might
be a starting point.

[TwoCatSam]

Kid77

There is a system which plays the Martingale on each street.  Twelve of them!  Takes two people to play it; each with 6 streets.  If the Martingale goes too high, it is averaged over all streets.

I'll look up the name for you.

Sam

[bjb007]

Yes please gizmotron. 
Always willing to learn.

[TwoCatSam]

Mark

Bring it on.  My brain ain't haf full.

Sam

[MXkid77]

BJB007

"I've not heard of any system which covers only
half of the numbers but it's worth some
thought.  High/Low divides the numbers so might
be a starting point."

problem with using a system based on high/low, I did 10 000 000 spins on Roulette extreme and high/low had no shows for a maximum of 40 +.

I have been looking into splits, but need more testing, to cover half the table with 9 units, payout being 17, so you could use a slow progression on the bets not winning, while the other half is winning, maybe a +coup on the winning half?

Possibly bet on splits using a street/line method as a base to track the bets.
Divide the table in half, but not high low, maybe bet 1 can be made up of splits on lines 1-6, 13-18 & 25-30,
bet 2 made up of splits on lines 7-12, 19-24 & 31-36.

Giz, that definately looks intresting, I will see if I can get ,my head around it.

[bjb007]

gizmotron

Am I right in assuming that "L,M,H" is your
way of referring to dozens and "B,M,T" to
columns?

[bjb007]

-