Playing over the weekend, DID GREAT!

[Mr J]

I usually dont go over the weekend because of crowds (slower spins) but I took a chance anyways. The place was dead, I think because of the poor economy, I have no idea. Anyways, a nice NET of $1,200, THANK YOU !! 

I kind of rotate between methods. I played >> Keep track of all numbers (streets) hit. I locate the furthest back hit street. It must be at least 27 spins back, if not 27 yet, I wait until it is. On average one third of the furthest back hit are already 27 (or more) spins back.

I then WAIT until it hits. Lets say its the 10 11 12 street. Say the 11 hit. I then start my 2 number progression (1-57) on the 10 & 12. All the while, keep track of numbers hit. I said/asked it before......the chances that the 2 LAST numbers hit (LONG term sleepers) on the entire layout are in the *SAME* street? Maybe but most likely not, in my opinion.  Ken

[Jakkalsdraai]

Very well done J! 

Give 'em hell brother!

Jakk

[Lanky]

Good OnYa Ken.

Good news Mate.....May it continue forever for You Mate.

Lanky.

[Spike]

I said/asked it before......the chances that the 2 LAST numbers hit (LONG term sleepers) on the entire layout are in the *SAME* street?>>

Ken, what on earth do the streets have to do with where the numbers are on the wheel? The layout is completely meaningless, it has nothing to do with anything. The ball and the wheel know nothing about the streets, they are in a different universe.

[Tangram]

The layout is completely meaningless, it has nothing to do with anything. The ball and the wheel know nothing about the streets, they are in a different universe.

But you could say the same of any layout-based system. Not sure what your point is Spike, if your point of reference is the layout then there's no inconsistency in playing this way, it's as valid as any other. If you were playing some physics/wheel based method at the same time then I could see what you mean, but Ken isn't.

[Bo0Merang]

I usually dont go over the weekend because of crowds (slower spins) but I took a chance anyways. The place was dead, I think because of the poor economy, I have no idea. Anyways, a nice NET of $1,200, THANK YOU !! 

I kind of rotate between methods. I played >> Keep track of all numbers (streets) hit. I locate the furthest back hit street. It must be at least 27 spins back, if not 27 yet, I wait until it is. On average one third of the furthest back hit are already 27 (or more) spins back.

I then WAIT until it hits. Lets say its the 10 11 12 street. Say the 11 hit. I then start my 2 number progression (1-57) on the 10 & 12. All the while, keep track of numbers hit. I said/asked it before......the chances that the 2 LAST numbers hit (LONG term sleepers) on the entire layout are in the *SAME* street? Maybe but most likely not, in my opinion.  Ken

i do  sometime tracking numbers as well last time i did try track one corner 7,8,10,11 it  tuck me for twice  hit  43 spins maybe i will research a littlebit about  way how  to make  it easy with money managment but actualy it was pretty good ))

[Mr J]

@Spike >> I'll try and explain my point. Lets take the very last 2 unhit numbers on the ENTIRE layout. We agree that those 2 can sleep a damn long time, sometimes too long. I use to play like that (it took forever to cross off 36 numbers). Yes, I had some very good days making money but mostly, the 2 numbers would sleep past my progression. This current way, I am betting on 2 numbers that have not hit in a LONG time but are NOT the 2 furthest back. Lets say someone did some research/testing (500 sessions). If you crossed off every number that hit until only 2 were left, how often would those 2 be in the SAME street *AND* that street has to be the furthest back hit?  Ken

[Spike]

To me its like you're juggling sticks of dynamite, betting they won't blow up in your face. No thanks....

[Mr J]

Why are you listed as a guest?  Ken

[Nathan Detroit]

Take a wild GUESS !


Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Nathan Detroit]

Maybe it`s time  to leave Dodge City  and ride into the sunset...........................


N.D.

[GARNabby]

This current way, I am betting on 2 numbers that have not hit in a LONG time but are NOT the 2 furthest back.

Ken,

This is the symbolic, rather than simplistic, approach-example i game to Giz in the thread nolinks://vlsroulette.com/general-board/how-to-beat-roulette/ .

Unlike baccarat's binary P-B choices, roulette offers the (inside) numbers; but roulette affords no card-information, by counting or randomization of.  Therefore, the type of randomness of roulette is more subtle; less about alternating sequences continuing(alternately), or about long streaks ending, or short ones beginning (, in the finite long-run, of course).  This, of course then, leaves us with the irregular zig-zag outcomes, which streak but don't streak... hence which should then end but not end, as by the "strategy" above.

Until some (real) applied physics models of randomness has been developed to account for how the past outcomes are being transformed into the future ones,  perhaps impossible with only those numerical outcomes, such a "strategy" may be a very-good stepping-off point.

Wrt Giz's request for specifics, i have some from the baccarat-vantage at nolinks://projectbaccarat.proboards.com/index.cgi .  (Interested persons may register first to be signed in later.)

[GARNabby]

-