Please enjoy this read winwithmarh

[warman]

 Here is some proof that people all over the world agree that I have something that is real enjoy the read.This will put the stops on those that say I have nothing. So enjoy my friends.

To all here if you don't understand something please ask and I will go over it with you .All here should know that my system is in the test area so check it out there.

Here is a post that was made by someone

The picture represents the hole where all the old and tired roulette methods and systems have to go. I can tell everyone on this forum that James's discovery will change the way everybody (well, almost everybody) thinks towards games of chance. It is the future, it is called HIDDEN MATH. It will save countless poor souls from searching the internet and only finding prehistoric betting methods that the authors even admit don't work in the long run, how can these guys sleep at night knowing that people are losing money they can probably ill afford to lose by following something that the author himself knows can never hold up. Yet they try to discredit everyone else out of false pride for their own work. Some people have been digging themselves in a hole for years and are pushing others in as well, it is about time the real thinkers of the 21st century are allowed to show what they have rather than listening to the know-all teachers who dress up everything that was never any good and never will be any good.


Here is another post that someone made

Hidden Math is what the name describes, it throws away all the misconceptions and old ideas that we have spent years looking at. Previous spins are completely irrelevant and should not be even considered. Progressions are a slippery slope down the "devil's staircase". You have to think in terms of the session as a whole. James was right when he said this leads to a few higher dimensions and he is playing on a completely different level to anything that has been mentioned not only here but in any books, and that includes authors who I would consider very knowledgeable on the subject of gambling. It is better than card counting, better than V.B. and I think many would even swap their roulette computers for it. What I am saying is that it is both original and unique. James must take a lot of satisfaction from what he has achieved here. I don't say any of this lightly and it has inspired my thinking and creativity towards roulette again that was sadly missing for a little while.

Another post someone made about me
Hello James, thank you. I thought that I sometimes looked out of the box. It looks like you have circumnavigated it. It opens up a whole new train of thought. If I am been honest with you, I would have never arrived at any of it. Maybe 1 step at most. You will never hear me mention Hamburg again, lol. Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees. All I can say to anybody else is to listen carefully and let it sink in without pre-judging anything. I am more stubborn than most but have to admit defeat when the truth is staring me in the face.
It is CHECKMATE indeed for hamburg, progressions and systems based on previous spins when compared with HIDDEN MATH. It's just a shame it was so well hidden, maybe I should have went to school more, lol. No, can't take anything away from you James. You are a proper gent and a good friend.
@Snowman, this is no joke. I will tell you how serious it is. I have had my computer hacked over the last few day's and I am not a happy chappie, it shows how desperate some people are to find out what people are saying to each other, it's a good job I don't keep any information on my laptop for any longer than 24 hours, this is basically the only site I come to, (there's a joke in there somewhere ) Anyway like I said HIDDEN MATH is no joke and it will be talked about for years to come as the gaming discovery of the early 21st century

winwithmath

James Albert Wendel

[gizmotron]

James, please accept my apologies. You were right all along.

[hideseek]

Thank you sir,
                  I am looking forward to chat with you.
HS

[hideseek]

Hi James,
I read most of your posts here and at GG.
I am changing the tracking style as LWs instead of -1,0,+1 etc.
Just see here:

R
B   L
B   W
B   W
R   L      +1
B   L
B   W     +2
B   W
R   L       +3
R   W
etc.

I agree with you. Random event swings back and forth a lot.
Thanks
HS

[hideseek]

Hi James,
              You wont like the extended testing. But to show the forum, about "back and forth" swings, I am posting this.
I believe your system is the Holy Grail,  what every one is searching for.

[hideseek]

Here is another test. It took long time to come back to +4. I am really enjoying the swings. 
Thanks James.
Still waiting to chat with u 

[hideseek]

Nice chatting with u James. Here is another quick one.

[Natural9]

Has there been any good explanation of this for us so called slow learners or are we still talking airey fairey stuff

[JavierTT]

I see we are connected now. Can we talk in Chat? Ill be there.

Greetings.

Javier

[JavierTT]

ok..... but where are the system explained¿? I cant find it.

thank you.

Javier

[hideseek]

I will try to explain it in simple terms natural:

1. What he says is "change" is the only thing happens in random events.
2. Random events swings back and forth
3. To capture those events we employ a simple flat betting system.
4. We stop at +4 on a win or else the back and forth motion will drag you down.
5. On a losing secession we stop at -8 or -4/-6 if you want.

OK now the system:
We can play any EC. Here I am explaining R/B:

Every spin we track for L/W. For betting we look back 2rd spin and decide.
If win or lose we skip 1 spin and look back 2rd spin and decide.

Now the example:

R
B   L
B   W
B   W----------> Here I am looking back 3 spins there is L so I am betting on R (B will lose)
R   L      +1
B   L-------------> skip and look back 3 spins there is W so expect B to win
B   W     +2
B   W---------------> skip and look back 3 spins there is L so I am expecting B to lose and Red wins
R   L       +3
R   W
etc.

If 0 comes just ignore dont write in the tracking. At the time of betting if 0 comes, just it is a loss. No L is entered in tracking.

I hope this helps. If you have any question shoot at me.

[Natural9]

Hide can you work this example out for me we betting odds and evens in this case with thanks

29
8
26
10
34
1
24
2
23
7
1
27
19
31
5
18
7
35
32
10
31
20
17
21
15
15
33
22
17
28
3
18

[sniper]

Hello Natural9,
                   
29  O
8    E  -1
26  E   0
10  E    +1     -1
34  E    +2
1   O    +1      +1
24  E    0
2   E    +1       +1
23  O   0
7   O   +1       +1
1   O   +2
27  O   +3       -1
19  O   +4
31  O   +5        -1
5   O   +6
18  E   +5        +1
7   O   +4
35  O  +5         +1
32  E   +4        
10  E   +5         +1
31  O  +4
20  E  +3          -1
17  O  +2
21  O  +3        +1
15  O  +4
15  O  +5         -1
33  O  +6
22  E  +5         +1
17  O  +4
28  E   +3        -1
3   O   +2
18  E  +1         -1

Col 3 is for tracking and col 4 actual betting.
We end up +1, highest was +3. We would have stopped if we hit target +4.
Tracking used Follow The Last (FTL)

Regards

sniper

[hideseek]

Let me try:

29       O
8         L
26       W
10       W---------> Bet L
34       W                -1
1         L   ---------> No bet and look back 2 spins ie 10 which has  W so play Odd
24       L                  -2 (we lose)
2         W-----------> No bet and look back 2 spins ie 1 which has L so play for odd
23       L------------->-1 (we won)
7         w------------> No bet and look back 2 spins ie 2 which has W so we play for odd
1         w------------> 0 (Won)
27        w
19        w----------> +1
31        w
5          w---------->+2
18         L
7           L---------->1 (Lose)
35         W
32         L-----------> +2 (Win)
10         W
31         L-----------> +1 (Lose)
20         L
17         L-----------> 0
21         W
15         L----------->+1
15         w
33         w----------->+2
22         L
17         L------------>+1
28         W
3           L------------>+2
18          W


I think the sequence ends here. Anyway the concept is made clear here.
I hope this helps.

[Natural9]

Hello Natural9,
                   
29  O
8    E  -1
26  E   0
10  E    +1     -1
34  E    +2
1   O    +1      +1
24  E    0
2   E    +1       +1
23  O   0
7   O   +1       +1
1   O   +2
27  O   +3       -1
19  O   +4
31  O   +5        -1
5   O   +6
18  E   +5        +1
7   O   +4
35  O  +5         +1
32  E   +4        
10  E   +5         +1
31  O  +4
20  E  +3          -1
17  O  +2
21  O  +3        +1
15  O  +4
15  O  +5         -1
33  O  +6
22  E  +5         +1
17  O  +4
28  E   +3        -1
3   O   +2
18  E  +1         -1

Col 3 is for tracking and col 4 actual betting.
We end up +1, highest was +3. We would have stopped if we hit target +4.
Tracking used Follow The Last (FTL)

Regards

sniper

Ok thanks Sniper

How does it perform long term

MM is to leave table once 4 units up so this cant be played continuously

Regards Rodney

[Natural9]

-