Hmmmmmm Telekinesis to win at roulette??????

[MJP78]

Well I'm not sure how that would be possible because telekinesis means movement of objects with mind power.    From my point of view , telekinesis is achieved by projecting a portion of your consciousness in the object that you want to move.   

So, I guess you could move the ball out the pocket it landed and into one of the pockets you bet on  

Next time I play Im going to 'be the ball'

[Mr J]

Oh boy...VIP here I come.  Ken

[Wildcard]

@ Ken > What do you mean, Ken ? 

@ All >  First of all, you need to KNOW telekinesis exists. Believing is not enough, as you will always be a little skeptic.

How do you KNOW telekinesis exists ? Just DO IT. You have the power to do it.

It requires relaxation and training. But anyone can achieve it and develop their special abilities.

On the other hand, picture how crazy it would look if you saw the ball strolling around the wheel, looking for a place to park. ....

" Here´s number 14, my telekinesis master will win big if i just sit here, let me get in reverse so i can park" 

Maybe the Tk specialist gambler should only move the (big value) chip to the winning number, instead !!! 

It´s also crazy, i know, but he couldn´t be accused of past posting since his hands were well in his pockets. 

   


 

[Mr J]

I do think its rubbish, sorry. Part of my arguement has always been.... Say you have 3 VERY focused players betting on red and 3 VERY focused players betting on black. Now what? Ken

[Wildcard]

I do think its rubbish, sorry.

That´s ok, you don´t have to be sorry.

But bear in mind that telekinesis is the ability to move objects through the power of the mind, without the use of physical force.

Objects and movement, not concepts (red/black) and movement.

You can´t move "black", or "green", or "pink", or "random" or "positive" with telekinesis.

You can move objects !

Now you ask:

"In that case, what would happen if 3 guys were trying to move the ball (object) into a black slot using only their mind power whereas 3 other guys were trying to move the ball into a red slot ? "

Well, that would be the same as 3 guys on each side of a rope pulling it to their respective sides. What 3 guys would win ? The ones at your left, or the ones at your right ? 

It´s not so easy to answer, is it, Ken ?

By the way, i don´t believe Tk exists, i KNOW it does. It makes a world of difference... Can i move a roulette wheel with Tk ?  Hell, no !  But that doesn´t stop me from trying ... one day 

Cheers.

[Davey-Jones]

Well Ken, there is one thing in which we do agree.



@ MJP78 (I have to be more clear as Ken is a retard)

By the way, if you are soooooo certain that TK exists. Why would you play roulette? Why wouldn't you focus on Lotto balls? The payout would seem better.

You can focus all you want on the ball to hit a specific number. And you will hit it from time to time. But I doubt the result will be from TK as much as you try to convince yourself. The problem with people like you is even if you did a few tests under controlled conditions and it failed multiple times, you'd still spend the rest of your life trying to make it work the one time.

[Steve]

Oh boy...VIP here I come.  Ken

Ken, this is ostracizing people for their sincere attempts to develop methods to beat roulette. If you have something to say against precognition, make it constructive. If you dont believe it is possible, do your research. If you still arent convinced of the potential, state your detailed reasons in a constructive way OR keep it to yourself.

I am trying to make vls a place where people can express their opinions without being made fun of or shot down just for trying to be productive. We can do without you making smart arse comments that tend to make people keep to themselves rather than sharing thoughts. Consider it a warning.

[Carlitos]

.......I once saw an guy, French men, moving an pen on an table with his mind........ so far the best Tk I have seen.  He was able to move it just an little bit.....the table was made out of glass...... so no tricks.....



Maybe ask Uri Geller about it.......he knows an thing or two about this stuff.......however....... I do not believe that it is possible to apply with roulette........



Maybe using an " mantra " ? Just say all the numbers of the roulette table like 1000 times for an week long every day, then go to the casino and look at the table first numbers that you think of play them.........




Carlitos  

[Mr J]

"By the way, if you are soooooo certain that TK exists" >>> What? Can you read? I'm saying it does NOT exist. (IMO)   Ken

[Mr J]

"But bear in mind that telekinesis is the ability to move objects through the power of the mind, without the use of physical force" >>> Thats fine, I can just re-word my point. 3 Jedi guys trying to "move" the ball to one half of the wheel while another 3 Jedi guys trying to "move" the ball to the other half of the wheel. Now what?  Ken

[Mr J]

"Consider it a warning" >>> And in bold letters. (Slowly, slowly.....)   "The problem with people like you" >>> Davey-Jones (one of your crew) said this to me. Is that ok? "do your research" >>> Again with the research and proof thing. Well, I have never tested drinking cat urine to cure a hangover BUT....it might work cause I really did not do my research on it???  Ken

[Mr J]

You know what Steve, I have asked this from you MANY times. Lets say we happen to come across a thread regarding whatever. Ya read something that you dont agree with. Now what? I used the word 'rubbish', thats a problem? Pick apart, word for word my post. *NOTHING* in there that is rude BUT I did not PROVE that TK does not exist.

Thats your beef? On this thread, TK was not proven to exist, so I'm looking for the consistency with your logic/rules. So if I start a thread that says...you can win at roulette if you eat six pieces of chicken before going to the casino, you're saying that no one is allowed to say otherwise because they cant PROVE I'm wrong. Is that the guideline of your rules?

Because if it is, I will follow it to a T but in return, will point out to YOU when its also not done for me.  You said, " If you have something to say against precognition, make it constructive". HOW? So I cant politely say I dont agree with it and then I followed it up with a GREAT point/question? Ken

[Carlitos]

...how do you know for sure it does not excist? ....... how do i know for sure it does excist? Basicly, we do not know for sure whether it excist or not....... therefor we don't know....... so we can not say it does or it doesn't................ we just can say we do not know...............





Carlitos 

[Mr J]

"how do I know for sure it does excist? Basicly, we do not know for sure whether it excist or not" >>> And thats fine but not my point with Steve. Then.....one person(s) (REGARDLESS OF WHO YOU ARE) should NOT be allowed to agree/disagree while the other, is allowed the opposite view, with NO PROOF. I'm looking for the rules to be the same.  Ken

[Steve]

Ken if you dont agree and cant scientifically prove precognition does NOT exist, just stay out of it - do not be a nuisance to other people who do believe, and are genuinely trying to develop related abilities. Simple. If they are wrong or if thats what you believe, let it be.

I want to encourage progress. With your earth is flat attitude, nothing new would be discovered or developed. Fine if that's your attitude, but dont push your beliefs to the point where you discourage further research, and ostracize others, like with the statement you made.

[Steve]

-