The 14 number Dominance by Compa and LeBear

[lucky_strike]

I think periodic events is the key to make it work.

Cheers LS

[Compa]

Hello Guys. I will try to explain this thingy. First of all I want you to read the original post if you havent already done so.

This strategy is based on playing only the cadences 0,7,3,5. The other numbers fills in between. I never play them in this context. They are only reference numbers for the cadences that I play. So that I know "when" to bet. Now, based on observations "my" Cadences comes VERY OFTEN within in a Timeframe of 3-7 spins. That doesnt mean the pattern can go completely eratic. I 've also seen 0,7,3,5 sleep for 11 spins, but never more than that. And very seldom. Compared with the other Cadences which might sleep for 6-10 spins occationally.


WHY do I picked these Cadences? Because according to MY opinion and observations for like 2 months, 4-6 hrs a day, they tend to show more often together than the other ones. Play it or not. I just lay out my idea.

Now, the "Demo" attached earlier demonstrates a very common pattern-developement in the Permanence like at DublinBet.

But first I will explain some different behaviour of the cadences that I play.

1. It will very often go like this:

30 <-cadence 0
14
12
34
7   <-cadence 7
13 <-cadence 3
21
6
29
5   <-cadence 5
--------------------I got 4 hits in 10 spins but I didnt play because My main-rule is wait 4 spins, which I can break though depending of the situation. Bet 3 spins with 112 prog

2. It might as well go like this:

31
11
23 <-cadence 3
12
4
8
9
34 L
16 L
19 L
----------- It hits on 3rd spin which is too early so I wait for 4 spins and lose anyway. So I retrack and wait for another opportunity.

3. And it goes like this:

25 <-cadence 5
17 <-cadence 7
13 <-cadence 3
12
21
22
11 <--i bet here
15 W<-------------I won on the absence of 4 spins. I can choose to rebet or pass. Depending of BR.

4. And like this:

15
3
27
10
35 <----------------Here's a nice flow so I go for it..
20 W
23 W
19 L <-------------Here's a TrendBreaker. Very often my cadences return, just like when betting RB. So I rebet.
17 W<-------------I stop Here and observe.

Here's a 5:th scenario:

12
13 cad 3
24
10 cad 0
11
30 cad 3
25 cad 5
13 cad 3
19 cad 9
31         --------------Here is messy but frequent zigzag pattern for 10 spins which I might very well would jump on

And to my latest Posted Example:

30
24   <--1 spin
18   <--2 spins <----------------i bet here already cause of 30 and a trend of win numbers prior to the 30.
20 W
13 W
12   <--1 spin
1
36
36 .
21   <--5 spins <-----------------i bet after 5 spins
3  W
0    <- 1 spin    <----------------i bet after 1 spin because of frequency of win numbers
27 W
21   <--1 spin
28
19   <--3 spin    <---------------i bet after 3 spins
10 W
19   <--1 spin    <---------------i bet after 1 spin
20 W
17 W
18   <--1 spin    <---------------i bet after 1 spin
10 W
6    <--1 spin
29
11
22   <--4 spins    <--------------i bet after 4 spins this time because I expect a break of the frequency of win numbers
10 W
-------STOP +144 units
 

I ALSO STOP IN BETWEEN BECAUSE OF OBSERVATIONS AND CONSERVING BR.
It might seem inconsequent but its about getting the feel of whats going to come. This is possible with observation and practice. I was also a little lucky this time. I might as well been on my ass...lol
Cheers
/Compa

[TwoCatSam]

/Compa

Thanks for the time it took to write that!  I will print it like I did post one and study them both.

Sam

[Compa]

Its my pleasure. I wish you all good wins. And i hope it comes in handy

Cheers
/Compa

[17black]

Compa and LeBear - Well done and congratulations on such a great system. More importantly thank you so much for sharing. I do find the mechanics however of when to bet a little difficult to follow and have come up with an alternative - commence betting only on the cadence of 0,3,5and 7 (the cadence) for a maximum total of three spins when and only when:-

1. The cadence has appeared in two (2) out of three (3) spins.
2. The first appearance of the cadence must have been preceded by two (2) numbers not included in the
    cadence

Betting Strategy:

(a) The attack lasts for a maximum of 3 spins and ceases immediately a strike is made.
(b) The following progression is used for each spin until a hit, namely 5, then 8, then 13
(c) when a strike is made we wait for a completely new sequence of numbers before starting again.

In the following example the = sign illustrates the qualifying cadences and the W naturally denotes a win.

16
10
30
23=
20=
1
13W
31
21
2
15=
5=
36
35W
19
1
6
28
29
25
6
36
29
5=
27=
8
32
23W
36
25
24
31
36
31
23=
33=
28
22
15W
27
8
6
29
5=
20
13=
5W
30
3
9
34
17=
13=
20W

On a loss just start again using the same progression.

Results thus far are encouraging. The system is relatively quick and easy and promises substantial returns in very few spins.
Any thoughts on how it can be improved? I would also appreciate comments if any one tests this further.

[LeBear]

Hi 17
     Thanks for your post.  This is why the fourm was designed, so that people could exchange ideas and improve on things that are posted by other people.  This is exactly what it is all about.  You have taken a basic idea and made it work for you in a fashion that you understand, and can implement for you own circumstances.  I look forward to seeing your future posts.  Thanks again for your input.

best regards,

LeBear

[Compa]

HEy 17! Great input buddy. Appreciate it. I will check it out asap!

Cheers
/Compa

[TwoCatSam]

Geez, why is it always me who asks these questions.............

Black17

Thanks for your input.  I have looked at your example for a long time and I don't understand.  Let me quote:

"1. The cadence has appeared in two (2) out of three (3) spins.
2. The first appearance of the cadence must have been preceded by two (2) numbers not included in the
    cadence"

And now your example:

"16
10
30
23=
20="

Look at 10 and 30.  They are in the cadence, are they not?  16 is not and we don't know what came before; maybe a cadence, maybe not.  But how could you use 23 and 20 as qualifying cadences when they are preceded by two cadences themselves?  Your rules are two cadences out of the last three spins with two non-cadences preceding them, is that not correct?

I am probably reading it wrong, but I swear I don't see how!

I am not gunning for you; I am only trying to figure it out.  Thanks for your idea on the system.

TwoCat

EDIT:  Every other example follows your instructions.

[Clothdog]

good point sam. I was wondering that myself. and what about this example he shows?
5=
20
13=
5W
30
3
9
34
17=
13=
20W
After the win on #5, we have 30 & 3. why did betting not start again?  you would have lost on 9,34 but hit on 17, and now you hvae 2 more cadences 13 & 20. Am I missing something?
cd

[TwoCatSam]

Hey, Mr. Dog from Buffalo...........

Good to see you again.

Well as I understand it, your two out of three must be preceded by two non-cadence numbers in a row.

Sam from Podunk

[17black]

Hi Guys

Ran through a 1000 spin test on numbers I have collected in sessions at Crown casino in Melbourne. I started with a theoretical bank of $3000.00. The betting sequence was $25, $40, & $65. In the first 150 spins all went well with the bank almost doubling. A rocky road was then encountered with a loss sequence of three in a row which depleted the bank somewhat. at about the 200 spin mark the bank was at -$1000.00. Now the good news. From that point forward the bank blossomed growing to $16,500 by the 1100th spin. I encountered a few double losses along the way but once the bank was rock solid it seemed to make only a small dent. Each loss equates to $1820 at the level of betting that I was notionally at which made the idea of introducing another level of betting for loss recovery too spookie to contemplate. Guys I think we are on too something because no system deployed thus far by me has managed to crack the Crown numbers. The only fear is striking a triple or double loss early on, but then again all progressions have an Achilees heel. I would venture to say that this system would have even produced a flat stakes profit which is quite incredible. I look forward to hearing from you again

Cheers to all

[17black]

Hi Sam & Clothdog

Sam you are right the first selection was wrong for non compliance with rule 2 - I can only attribute this mistake to "number fatigue".

Clothdog the attack ceases on a win. Then we have to wait for a new cadence (two out of three) which is preceeded by two numbers not included in the cadence to start again.  In your query the numbers which follow are from the same cadence following a win. I hope this clarifies the point.

Regards
to all

[xman1970]

Very nice 1st input 17Black 

Welcome to the forum, I'm sure you will be a valued member 

[TwoCatSam]

Ah, yes, number fatigue!!  Suffered from it myself many times!!

Good on you, (as Lanky says) Black17. 

What the hell did I live for before roulette???  Oh, yeah, I was a world famous Karaoke singer.

Sam

[Compa]

LOOL!!

Me and LeBear says Hi and are trmendously happy we produced a System that works great even with a Tweak!
Next upcoming Event will be the 6 chips Mirror Number Bet!!

Cheers
/Compa

[Compa]

-