Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Dublinbet.com - live casino - roulette table 1

Started by husky, March 08, 2010, 03:56:53 PM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Herb6

QuoteI disagree. I haven't seen a loss with this system. It's only matter of time it get's to profit. I'm almost done with the first test with 200 recorded spin.

Only 200 spins? So?

Danger Man

The problem is, you're still not in any position to draw conclusions about your system since you haven't even tested the wheel in question for bias, and I'm quite sure that if you did a chi-square test the results would be normal. Therefore your theoretical profits are, at the moment, basically due to natural variance.

husky

Quote from: Herb6 on March 31, 2010, 02:00:08 PM
Only 200 spins? So?

OMG. Doesn't anyone read the whole topic before showing off here with the theoretical knowledge even without any testing by himself?

I'm playing DB table one from 30/07/2007. I'm not from yesterday. I'm not a theoretic like every smartass that comes here and discredits these tests and my play.

I could test this here for years and after that time still be with 10-15% yield, and double every deposit in 2 days.... and still some c**k-sucker would come here and say: Only 40 000 spins? You're an idiot, this system is a loser, you need 1 000 000 spins!

If I'm so wrong, go play contraire and win millions or get lost from this topic.

husky

And please, say a starting time for DB spins, we'll watch it live and I'll play.... I'll bet you that my system will win. I'll give you 1:10 odds for your bet. Please, show me I'm wrong, punish me....  :lol:

husky

Here are the results of the third test, with 242 spins, 11 patterns played at the time. Great start, then stayed in profit. I'd say it couldn't go far, not under the starting bank, before another high jump to profit.

One more to be done, and then I'm onto playing, no more writing here. Too much negative people. I'll say it again, go to martingale topics, and get yourself rich, don't spilt on people that work.

Few data is interesting. Average of 25 units staked per spin, average of 16 numbers played. Maximum drawdown 580 units. Not as close as my >1500 bankroll. Highest up is 424 which can be seen at the graph. And generaly, went from 430 to 1240 in 47 spins. So the profit kicked loss'es ass out. Like usual.  :yahoo:

husky

P.S. I'd hardly play more after that +700. Maybe risked to 1000 lowest, but even less profit after a loss is good. Though, it's not recommended to quit a winning strike. Like in the game, wait for 6 to hit, if hit, risk more 3 times for another hit. Bankroll needs a good manager. It's not all about the maths, it's just like stock trading. Don't sell at the obvious moment, try for more. I'm done with triggers, I'll start playing after approx 10 numbers that would give me a loss if played. A long down-line is impossible. This system has shorter losing periods even compairing to 50:50 chances play. Look at the graph, you just can't see a down going line longer then 10-13 spins. Even a higher peak comes in 20-30 spins. All that player has to do is: say thank you, and take the profit when it comes. If there's no profit shortly, don't worry, a steep up line is soon to come.

Herb6

Question:  Are you using an up as you lose progression?

husky


Herb6

In other words, are you increasing your bets as you lose, or are you increasing your bets only when you win?

husky


husky

Increasing after a loss would give us totaly different graph, it would go slowly up, with steep down-going lines. 4 numbers can, by my humble research, sleep for 50-80 spins. More then 80I do not recall, and 50+ is just the matter of time, because I think that every time you pick 80 numbers spun, there will be 4 or more numbers that haven't hit. Any time your combination can bein it. So how can you increase that much? I lose the same amout if my numbers sleep 7 or 77 or 777 spins. My bankroll is safer that way and that's one of the facts why I can't lose big.

husky

11-pattern play doing great, no loss, just profit at DB.  :thumbsup:

I've opened an account at the Smart live casino, my first out-of-DB account for live play. Doing tests by writing down numbers spun, much easier, because the have the last 185 number database. One look at it in 3 hours, and you can have'em all written and do the testing.

Started playing also for real, it's great that DB and SLC work together, and SLC behaves great according to my patterns, a profit achieved so far, no downs, just up today. I'll see how it works at the long term, very long, because I've taken the 150% deposit bonus. Deposited 333 €, got 500 bonus, so 833 ready to play. I need to wager 33 300 €. It shouldn't be a problem, it's a great advantage for me, not much in, but a great side bettinng while plying DB.

husky

Still no loss, just profit.  :yahoo:

With 20 patterns, I doubled every deposit with 15% bonus and 9x(bonus+deposit) wager requirement. Now, with 11 patterns, I double it between 30 and 50% of the wager requirement, triple or more at the end of the session. 2-4 days, depending of my time for play.

It's just funny how it's impossible to prove that you have a winning system, as hard as developing it.

I'll open a blog with tutorials and other dublinbet materials.

Fraudster

Brilliant

i am soo lucking forwrad to ure method of play ....


DB and SLC are my favourity casinos anyways.


And i like the kinda pattern/wheel bias systems anyways ..... SO THIS IS GONNA BE ONE FOR ME :)


Mike

buffalowizard

So where you going with this Husky? Are you gonna tell us the numbers, and exactly how you play,  or wait till someone buys it off you?

buffalowizard

-