Fully automated online roulette bot -Freebie

[Mr J]

"Reset system after amount of spins: 56" >>> Does this include the 10 skips? I appreciate your time Tiago2 but you're not testing for me, perhaps others. The testing means nothing in my eyes. I'll CONTINUE to play regardless of the outcome. Even if it is coded wrong, it doesn't affect me.  Ken

[Tiago2]

I'm following the video that TwoCatSam did explaining the system. 10 skips? That wasn't mentioned in the video... I'll have to go re-read the thread.
The bot is  being coded for the members of vls. The majority of the testing will be done by members that use the software. I want to be sure the system is coded correctly as it will be a fully automated bot that is able to place real bets if the user wanted to.

The software is not for me either, if it was I wouldn't bother with a GUI as I'd be able to change settings in code and just recompile it.

Anywayz cheers for the system, have you got any further thoughts on the "SIX unhit pairs on one side and zero on the other", the image that I posted in the system's thread. Many thanks

[Mr J]

"10 skips?" >>> and thats just the beginning. I have always done manual testing with roulette. One spin at a time. One by one by one by one by one by one by one etc   Ken

[Tiago2]

Everything is put through silicon with me. Haven't got the time or patience to to test manually.

To those that are interested... worked a bit more on the bot today, got it up to scratch. Everything is working except for the system. Can't see myself having time to continue this for a week or two... thou who knows.

Video demonstrating features of the bot
nolinks://nolinks.screencast.com/users/Tiago2/folders/Default/media/1eabb1f8-3e51-46fa-94b9-5253e0818c10

[Mr J]

The issue with a 'bot'......lets say at some point there are situations with 'what ifs'. Well, it does not matter with a bot, its coded. Testing manually allows me to sit and ponder the 'what ifs' AS THEY HAPPEN. I correct the issue(s) and move on. Its only my preference but like I said, I *DO* appreciate your time.  Ken

[A3on47]

How is this going tiago?

[Noble Savage]

The issue with a 'bot'......lets say at some point there are situations with 'what ifs'. Well, it does not matter with a bot, its coded. Testing manually allows me to sit and ponder the 'what ifs' AS THEY HAPPEN. I correct the issue(s) and move on. Its only my preference but like I said, I *DO* appreciate your time.  Ken

Translation:

"If my system fails in automated testing using this bot (even though it's a mechanical system), it doesn't mean I ever lose using it because when *I* play it, my mystic guts tell me to adjust the system accordingly beyond its rules at the right moment in such a way that I never lose. So it's not my problem if this system fails but hey, I'm always a winner."

[A3on47]

Translation:

"If my system fails in automated testing using this bot (even though it's a mechanical system), it doesn't mean I ever lose using it because when *I* play it, my mystic guts tell me to adjust the system accordingly beyond its rules at the right moment in such a way that I never lose. So it's not my problem if this system fails but hey, I'm always a winner."

I respect Mr.J and for me he is an wonderful member and roulette player !

But I've to say I laughed my ass off when I read this 
ahahah

[Tiago2]

I wont get into the whole bot vs not a bot war. To each his own.

Currently the bot is still where the video left off. The system hasn't been implemented in it yet. Haven't had the free time needed yet to complete it. But this bot is still on the list of projects I need to complete, thou not very high up on that list...

I'll keep you all posted when progress on it starts to move forwards again...

[nonk21]

Hey everyone, been reading this forum for over a year now, this be my first post.   I have to say I'm quite interested in the Robsky's system, especially as it sounds like it's showing good profits flatbetting.   Am going to use it manually on my own but would love a bot to do it as well.   I wouldn't mind paying for it either.   I'm in the USA and am using RTG casino Club World, they were highly recommended on Casino Meister's site, plus they have units as low as 0.  25, hard to find that in US accepting casinos.   Anyways, I dunno if this project is still being pursued but that's just my 2 cents.   

Matty B

[nonk21]

Actually I did some manual testing of Robsky's system, the results and my thoughts are here:

hxxp: vlsroulette. com/testing-zone/testing-of-robsky%27s-one-number-system/

[KombinatoR]

Hi Taigo2! Any news related to freebie?

[Tiago2]

Hi people, I have finally found some free time to code this bot. Yes it's been a long wait, its a free bot so there was really no rush for me and it was put at the bottom of the to-do-list. In any way the bot is coded and the system is running.

Based on popular vote, the bot works with Dublinbet Live and it runs Mr J's' My Method' system (Thanks Mr J for the system  ). Thank you to all who voted and gave system suggestions.

There's still some quirks to be fixed in the bot's GUI, so a bit more time until the bot is released.

However, I am looking for beta testers. If you would like to be a beta tester the only requirement is that you MUST know how Mr J's 'My Method' works. I need help in verifying that the system is coded correctly. Your task would be to manually input numbers in such a manner to test different circumstances the system may encounter and verify that the system operates correctly to them. You will also get the chance to be one of the firsts to test out the bot in all its glory using full automation on Dublinbet.

If you're interested in being a beta tester let me know. Thanks

[Tiago2]

Screen shot of some of the bots functionalities, including the settings window for the system

[Twisteruk]

Soo looking forward to this  


Thanx Tiago2 for all your workk  


Thanx Ken for an awesome sounding system.     

[Twisteruk]

-