@ The Roulette Professor

[Bayes]

I am more than happy to answer any general questions, over an above that, just go to the website nolinks.therouletteprofessor.com.au/ .

It seems you can't sign up without first paying $198. Why would I do that merely to have questions answered?

[superman]

And the thread is now locked, I pm'd Lohrno, waiting for a reply

[therouletteprofessor]

OK bayes, i can see that your good at cutting and pasting, and you are obviously reading my posts, so what are the questions you want answered. ?
if you are not prepared to spend Au$99. to educate yourself, then you cant see the forest for the trees mate.
from lohnros test case, the first five sets returned a 6 unit profit each, well most of us gamblers would be using $5.00 chips so by my calcs 6 X $5.00= $30 profit each set. now that x 5 =$150 so you would get your $99 back plus a 10% profit just in the first 5 sets, based on my minimum float off 100 chips.
has the penny dropped yet?
every 5 completed sets gives you a 30% return.---- ALWAYS----now as an investor/ daytrader/gambler im happy with that.
how greedy do people need to be before they wake up. doubling your money involves great risk and most of the time you end up with nothing.

[Herb6]

Sorry Bayes,

But I don't think I'd waste a dime buying anything from the lesser professor. 

[Spike!]

I think the professor got his degree at the University of Wendel.

[Ka2]

every 5 completed sets gives you a 30% return.---- ALWAYS----

And yet here you are, trying so hard to convince everyone of your system. Why??? You obviously dont need the money??? So I ask again Why?

[Bayes]

what are the questions you want answered. ?

1) How many spins in a set? is it playing until you win 6 units or reach the loss limit?
2) What is the maximum stake you would ever have to place?

[therouletteprofessor]

a set has a minimum of 2 spins, it can also be many more, but because we have 2 contingency levels a winning set would rarely go above an average of 7-8 spins. i have posted a table of losing to winning ratios you need to consider for eg in 11 spins if you lose 6 with 5 wins you will close a set and take profit. whether it takes 2 spins or 11 spins you will always come out with a profit of 6 units. your loss limit is the float you choose to start with, if you start with a float of 100 units we have found that you can take a loss count of between 10 and 13 hits. at a float of 200 units you can take a loss count of between 15 & 18. the only way to take this big a hit is if the opposite to your 50/50 just keeps coming, and you fail to recognise it. now because of our 1st contingency we have found a way to reduce the damage caused by this sort of negative run. remember i am here trying to show how to minimise  the result of a negative run. anybody can boast when the're winning. 
from lohnro s test his biggest single bet was either 32 or 34 from my last 20 cards with at least 300 sets recorded my biggest single bet was 26 units. the next closest was 18
my 2 contingency levels stop you from getting into large bets if the run is going against you. cant do that with martingale or fibonacci
at that level of loss, frustration and ego get in the way, you will begin to bet irrationally trying to prove that you can win and thats what the house wants you to do.
if more people are taught to control their emotions when gambling and treat it like a small business then more of us will take profit from the house. and that is the desired end result more of us taking money from the house  even if it is just small amounts each time. like i said earlier if 10000 people per week take $100 profit instead of losing $100 then the house will drop 2,000,000 sometimes the bigger picture is not always clear enough for people to see it.
i hope that gives you what you were looking for.

[Bayes]

Thanks. 

[Bayes]

-