ONE SMART METHOD THAT WORKS

[hermes]

Suicide? Not at all! If you will play only after W as a trigger it is very real winning progression but cover zero from 3rd step.
Hermes

[albalaha]

buddy,
          do not forget that you are covering 24-25 numbers for peanuts risking a very huge amounts. I know when you move from dozen to row there are least chances of loss but a single loss would end up your earnings of hours. not a good system for long time playing.

[medo]

buddy,
          do not forget that you are covering 24-25 numbers for peanuts risking a very huge amounts. I know when you move from dozen to row there are least chances of loss but a single loss would end up your earnings of hours. not a good system for long time playing.

Even blind can see that.

[bikemotorman]

I UNDERSTAND THIS IS NOT A LONG TERM AND METHOD.
THE POINT IS TO PLAY A SHORT TERM TREND YOU JUST CANT OR WILL NOT PLAY THIS FOR HOURS ON END.
THAT BEING SAID YOU CAN AND WILL PROFIT FROM A SHORT TREND THE CASINO IS IN THE LONG TERM BUSINESS, WE ARE NOT WE PLAY FOR MAYBE A COUPLE OF HOUR WITH A PROFIT AND GO HOME.
IF YOU SEE RED IS THE TREND FOR THE LAST 5 SPINS PLAY IT, RED WILL AT TIMES TREND FOR 15 SPINS.

SOMEONE TOLD ME THIS BELOW.
I heard from an experienced person that the best moment to bet is when the long-term patterns are currently becoming the active short-term trend does that make sense.
Kind of like red hits every other spin so play it with short progreession, then red high starts trending, so play red high with a short progression.
follow the pattern with the most strike rate for the current session. As simple as that.

Stuart

[buffalowizard]

I like what Hermes is saying stuart.

Look at your sequence before in the thread

WWWWLLLWWWLWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWLWWLLLLWWLWLWWWWZW

8 WINS + 1 LOSS   most losses in a row = 1

So you would only bet 1 time after a Win. and wait for a loss then another trigger Win. Only sequence to kill you would be WLWLWLWL

[buffalowizard]

Couple of sessions here. Using the 1 attack after a Win.

1st session

LD - L
LC - WWWL
D - L
C - WL
D - WWWWWWWL
C - L
D - L
C - WL
D - L
C - WWWL
D - L
C - WL
D - WL
C - WWWL
D - 0WWWWWWL
C - L
D - WWWWWWL

6 wins 4 losses...........most losses in a row = 2.....no problem at all

2nd session

D - WL
C - WW0WL
D - WWL
C - L
D - WWWWWWWWWL
C - WL
D - WW0WL
C - WWWL
D - WWWL
C - L
D - WWWWL
C - WL
D - WWWWWWL
C - WWL
D - WWWL
C - WL
D - L
C - WWL
D - L
C - WWWWWWL

12 WIn   4 Losses     Most losses in a row = 1

Using a progression this system would be great

[buffalowizard]

And here is your earlier session from hell

LWLWWWWWWWWWWWWLLLLWWWWLWWLLWWWLWWLWZWLZLWZWLLWWWW

Bet 1 attack after a Win

6 Wins  3 losses  2 Zeros.

Most losses in a row= 1

The moral from this session is to cover the zero! Then there would've been no trouble here

[balint]

i play like this:

- wait the trigger LL s...W  bet now
- bet 1/1  always until appear the first L
- start again with the trigger W
- until we are in plus , still bet like above
- when we go down , try this bets A or B :

A.

Up 3 after loss / down 2 after  win , on each doz. ( or column)

B.

Up 2 after  win  / down 3  after  loss, on each doz. (or col.)

But when  we are in plus , back to 1/1

long nolinksww streaks must appear
 

[buffalowizard]

I play like this:

- wait the trigger LL s...W  bet now
- bet 1/1  always until appear the first L
- start again with the trigger W
- until we are in plus , still bet like above
- when we go down , try this bets A or B :

A.

Up 3 after loss / down 2 after  win , on each doz. ( or column)

B.

Up 2 after  win  / down 3  after  loss, on each doz. (or col.)

But when  we are in plus , back to 1/1

long nolinksww streaks must appear
 

The only danger with carrying on betting for the streaking wins is when it gets really choppy. I reckon betting just the once after a win, although much more conservative, may make you last longer

[hermes]

Guys, it is wasting time go to casino to play only for one hit. Kindergarten children already know that 2 dozens come around 66% of the time. Wait for the trigger W and then bet all WWWWW until first loss and then wait for new W trigger again. Make a use of the winnings strings of 2 dozens or columns! There is the power of the system.
Hermes

   

[Herb6]

I'm sorry to say this guys, but this whole LWLWLLW stuff is nonsense.  It's based on gamblers fallacy.

It's because roulette is a game of independent trials.

[Mr J]

Granted, I did not read a word of it but I have a question. Why is it that EVERYTHING 'they' dont play, is gamblers fallacy? lol  Ken

[Spike!]

Why is it that EVERYTHING 'they' dont play, is gamblers fallacy? lol  Ken>>>

I can tell you that when I ask myself questions as to why I made a specific bet, almost every answer violates some form of Gamblers Fallacy. Thats fine with me..

[bikemotorman]

Hey guys I ALWAYS cover 0 00 as HERMES has said we need to have a period of virtual play.
Playing two cols or dozens will destroy your bankroll if you are not careful.

Stuart

[Spike!]

Hey guys I ALWAYS cover 0 00<<<

If you do that on every bet, all you ever do is win back the money you invested on 0 00, it doesn't protect your bet at all.

[Spike!]

-