The 100 Spin Challenge

[Davey-Jones]

Spike is too stupid to realize that there is VLS chat. This thing could be done in real time in a couple hours. And witnessed and saved/recorded by anyone else in the chat.

Either way, nice to hear you whine about something that doesn't concern you Spike. Quit acting like a girl.

[Noble Savage]

Win with a progression in 100 spins is too easy 

Yes, but the winner is the one who ends with more money. If you play a very safe progression it would work against you in the sense that you would win slowly.

Btw, we can do longer challenges if this one works out well.

Spike is too stupid to realize that there is VLS chat. This thing could be done in real time in a couple hours. And witnessed and saved/recorded by anyone else in the chat.

Either way, nice to hear you whine about something that doesn't concern you Spike. Quit acting like a girl.

lol

[Spike!]

Guys, has anyone of you seen this coming?>>

I've done this before, you haven't. If you want just the 3 of you, do it in private. If you want a public contest, thats very complicated if you have a lot of players. Like I said, the prospect for cheating looms large because all the dealer has to do is tell one friend the next spins. Its happened before. They say "Ha ha, hee hee, wouldn't it be funny if we cheated?" They don't start out to cheat, but the friend is losing badly and he wants to show everybody how smart he is.

I'll play if its well organized. If its a going to be a cluster f***, as it often is, forget it, I don't have the time.

[suitcase charlie]

I am just going to flat bet on straight up numbers.

[Spike!]

Spike is too stupid to realize that there is VLS chat.>>

Not at all, go for it. As it has obviously already turned into a douche bag contest, (thanks for clarifying that, Davey, what was I thinking) I'm out.

Have fun.

[Davey-Jones]

I'm so well disliked on these forums, I don't trust ANYBODY not to screw me. I need actuals I can look up myself after its over. Whats wrong with that? The EU casinos actuals are accurate, I use them every day.

Yeah Spike... EVERYONE is out to screw you. Get over yourself already!

I can understand it if you are the only on in the challenge, but you aren't. Quit being a baby. Sounds like you just have a buttload of actuals that you want to run off those 30 spins. Who says you haven't been data mining for these last few years? You say you use them everyday. Typical. It's pathetic really.

[Davey-Jones]

Of course you are out Spike. You have nothing to show.

[A3on47]

Like I said, the prospect for cheating looms large because all the dealer has to do is tell one friend the next spins. Its happened before. They say "Ha ha, hee hee, wouldn't it be funny if we cheated?" They don't start out to cheat, but the friend is losing badly and he wants to show everybody how smart he is.

I'll play if its well organized. If its a going to be a cluster f***, as it often is, forget it, I don't have the time.

Do you have any reasons to don't trust me?
You're a cool guy spike, despite everything is said. Play with us, it will be a pleasure

I am just going to flat bet on straight up numbers.

In my way of thinking, there isn't other way of beat it 
My bet will be on you ! Ahah
No hard feelings Noble Savage and NewIdea. Just joking 

Afonso

[Noble Savage]

I'll use % betting on wheel sectors.

[Carpanta]

You are a smart guy, Afonso!!!   and you are right. It's no merit to play 70 spins and be ahead with a progression.
IF anyone has a winning method then flat betting would be enough to beat roulette but a progression would let you have sooner the casino's money in your pocket.
I beat roulette playing 5 numbers (inside bets) at the most per spin. I dont play every spin. I have a smooth progression to increase my winnings.
I believe the winner of the chanllenge should be the person who has the higher percentage of hits on account of his/her stakes.

Carlos.

PD: and yes, Noble Savege, it is called very often holly grail. I prefer to say ive got the skill to produce the bet selection more probable to be awarded by the next spun number. It doesnt mean i hit every stake but enough to be above the due percentage. It can be calculated and that's most important to be a winner.

[suitcase charlie]

I like the way you put it Carpanta, I agree with you.
When I play in the casino, if I am winning, I sometimes increase just a little bit if I am only going to bet a few numbers. I figure if that is my bet and things are working, I can gradually wind it up a bit. On a loss, I will always revert back to the flat bet.

[NewIdea]

Will play on targeted wheel sector numbers only.( using probable ball landing zone)
Strictly no progression bets.

[A3on47]

I'll use % betting on wheel sectors.

Interesting.
I was a little afraid of losing my time here, as I didn't know much about suitcase and newidea... and for me honest, you seem so negative sometimes that I doubted a little about your way of playing.

But now I'm sure it will be interesting, after the three different ways you three will be playing

The way I play now is something like Noble and SuitCase way (of course there is 329842891631 ways of playing inside numbers and use % betting on wheel sectors)
Ball landing zone I never tried, but I always had hope in that way of playing 

You are a smart guy, Afonso!!!  and you are right. It's no merit to play 70 spins and be ahead with a progression.
IF anyone has a winning method then flat betting would be enough to beat roulette but a progression would let you have sooner the casino's money in your pocket.
I beat roulette playing 5 numbers (inside bets) at the most per spin. I dont play every spin. I have a smooth progression to increase my winnings.
I believe the winner of the chanllenge should be the person who has the higher percentage of hits on account of his/her stakes.

First of all thanks Carpanta, and nice to meet you (haven't seen you here before, despite all your posts :S), I was kinda way from forums when you were more active ...
It would be awesome if you played too  

Well, instead of a smooth progression you can increase your winnings be flat betting... You need a bigger bankroll for use that smooth bankroll than you need for flat betting I presume.
So by flat betting you can use a bigger unit size = more winnings

I'm a big fan of flat betting  

Regards,
Afonso

[Carpanta]

I play mini-games. Acording to the neccesary hits to close a mini-game in plus i use more or less chips to increase my stakes with a smooth progression as i stated before. While losing i keep on with the progression but when i achieve the aimed score i go back to flat betting.

[A3on47]

I play mini-games. Acording to the neccesary hits to close a mini-game in plus I use more or less chips to increase my stakes with a smooth progression as I stated before. While losing I keep on with the progression but when I achieve the aimed score I go back to flat betting.

I see...
A friend of mine had a similar way of playing. I hope you have more "luck" than he had

[A3on47]

-