Flat bet no progression system that works. (2000 spins, +732 units profit)

[kav]

What the hell are you talking about? the proof is everywhere!  

That's what they said when they believed the earth was flat

[Spike!]

20% is a lousy edge, not worth it.>>

Not to me. At 20%, too much can happen. But how would you know, its like trying to explain color to somebody who's blind. Waste of time..

[kav]

Guys much smarter than you, even Nobel prize winners in finance (LTCM) tried to predict the market and failed. Don't tell me it can be predicted with mathematical certainty. It can not. Everybody knows that, don't you?

[Bayes]

Bayes,

I don't want to shock you or something, but you will be not alive to see the long run.

The long run doesn't take long to manifest. Usually a few thousands spins or less is enough. Again, the proof is all around you, why do you think this forum exists? 

And if you had a real edge (the kind of asymmetry I was talking about) you could easily multiply your bankroll into millions. The Wizard of Odds shows on his site that with an edge of only 0.5% you would be a millionaire within a year, playing for 40 hours per week.

I can easily write a program to show this. Any system posted here will win if you have the edge.

[Spike!]

Such is not the case with the random game of roulette.>>

You math people talk about random like its the bogeyman. Can't predict it, can't understand it, can't even look it in the eye without being paralyzed by fear. Best just to respect it as an enemy that can never be defeated and stay out of its way.

Roulette is my b***h, its not my enemy. I spank it every time I play and it respects ME, not the other way around..

[Noble Savage]

Not to me. At 20%, too much can happen. But how would you know, its like trying to explain color to somebody who's blind. Waste of time..

lol If you say so Spike. Why should I talk to you? You're no different than Charles Hampshire or Wendel.

[Spike!]

The Wizard of Odds shows on his site that with an edge of only 0.5% you would be a millionaire within a year>>>

Playing in the Fantasyland Casino, thats true. But that casino doesn't exist. No casino would tolerate a player just sitting there winning week after week and month after month. Sherminator on GG just posted that he was in a casino in England last week and won a few pounds one day playing a system and the next DAY they refused to let him in. Thats reality, not the fantasy the Wiz enjoys.

[Bayes]

That's what they said when they believed the earth was flat

I never understand why people drag up irrelevant analogies whenever they can't show or prove anything. What does this have to do with the matter under discussion? people believed many things throughout history, some of which have been proved wrong, so what?

'They said the bumble-bee could never fly' is another old favourite.

[Bayes]

Sherminator on GG just posted that he was in a casino in England last week and won a few pounds one day playing a sytem and the next DAY they refused to let him in. Thats reality, not the fantasy the Wiz enjoys.

Sherminator is 'johnnyg'. Remember him? a scammer and pathological liar.

[kav]

I never understand why people drag up irrelevant analogies whenever they can't show or prove anything. What does this have to do with the matter under discussion? people believed many things throughout history, some of which have been proved wrong, so what?

'They said the bumble-bee could never fly' is another old favourite.

It has to do with the fact that "the proof is everywhere!" is not a real proof.

[Spike!]

You're no different than Charles Hampshire or Wendel.>>

You make my point exactly. You're so full of yourself and so ignorant, everybody who has a different view gets lumped together. You can't differentiate between the kooks and the legitimate players, to you they're all the same. Which, believe it or not, is fine with me. Wising up chumps being what it is..

[Bayes]

Kav,

I can post a mathematical proof if you want. Would it make any difference to you? why do you care? just carry on doing what you're doing.

[Spike!]

Sherminator is 'johnnyg'. Remember him?>>>

The story has the stink of authenticity. Its how casinos are these days, they are all looking at the bottom line. The Wiz can win all day long on paper, finding a real casino to do it in is impossible.

[Spike!]

I can post a mathematical proof if you want.>>>

You can post proof that says I can't accurately guess the next spin at greater than 50% by looking at past spins? No you can't. And you know it.

[Noble Savage]

Guys much smarter than you, even Nobel prize winners in finance (LTCM) tried to predict the market and failed. Don't tell me it can be predicted with mathematical certainty. It can not. Everybody knows that, don't you?

Did I say I can predict the market with mathematical certainty? Of course not, everybody knows that. Anything can happen, there are always unknown forces and traders operating.

I just said that sometimes I see things that I wouldn't see in a random walk. Would a mindless random walk for instance react to support/resistance levels or big round numbers the same way the price does?

But then again, I doubt you'll know what I mean unless you spent enough time studying price action. So just ignore it, and let's get back to (and stick to) roulette.

Guys much smarter than you or any gambling system author (including Nobel prize winners) couldn't beat roulette consistently without physics. You fail to accept that, not because it is unacceptable or unprovable, but simply because you don't want to. I know, I've been there too.

What you chose to believe in is your business for sure, just try not to spread misinformation like you sometimes do (here and in your blog).

[Noble Savage]

-