System from an other forum.seems good!

[Jean-Claud]

The name of the System maker is Jordan and he is in Victor's forum

Ok here we go:
the method is on ECs...1 EC everytime not all 3!!!!!
So pick up 1 and start

U must chose a pattern bet...any pattern bet!!! It doesn't matter which pattern as soon as you will NOT change it during play!!!
By pattern bet I mean:
eg.Bet the colour of the last
    or   bet the oposite colour of the last.
    or RR=R(RUN) and BR =B(CHANGE)
IN MY TESTING I USED THE LAST COLOUR FOR MORE EASY...I SUGEST U DO THE SAME SO U WILL NOT MAKE ANY MISTAKE.

so now you know where we bet
  Now lets explain HOW MUCH to bet(MM)
U will start by betting 1 chip.
U will have a pen and a papper and you will write
     Wins     Losses
eg.    w                      L
        w                      L
        w                      L
                              L   etc...

when you will see that you have eg 4 W and 8 L you will continue betting to the same pattern(eg last colour...we never ever change the pattern!!!!) but you will add 1 more chip in every new bet...(so 2 chips)
This is happening when we are in a stage that we have 4 more the Ls than Ws.
so eg if we have 7 W and 10 L we still bet 1 chips...But when it will be 7W and 11 L(4 Ls more) we will imidiatelly continue betting with 2 chips!
 we continue betting 2 chips until we are in a new pofit or close to the prinious one(if it made us hard time)...then we bet again with 1 chip.
now if we are in a stage that we are betting 2 chips and the deference between W and L is 8 more L than W then we imidiatelly bet 3 chips(+1 more).again until new profit.and then bet again 1 chip.
So 4 less    w   =bet 2 chips
    8 less    w   =bet 3 chips
    12 less  w   = bet 4 chips...etc...
In my tests I never had to bet more than 6.

that's it...
I posted all free all I need is more tests....          

ps. you must write down the Ls and the Ws no matter what was the order!!!
I mean that we arent looking for 4 consecutice losses!!!!we are looking for 4 or 8 or 12 etc overal losses!!!
and after every new + we are restaring writing down  the Ws and Ls.

Everytime that U will be betting Bigger(because you had losses) the accuracy of the bets will be becoming biger...because Randomness will have to balance the Ls and the Ws....and we are betting so safe that we have lot of spins to hunt the balance.  

We do not need the Randomness to make a perfect balance of Ls and Ws because we are betting with this mild progression...so we need less Ws than the Ls....isn t it great!!!isn t it reasonable?

Source: nolinks://rouletteforum.cc/full-systems/bet-light-bet-heavy-but-always-safe!/

[Jean-Claud]

He also mentioned that he has won 30X100 spins sessions all with profit

I think that this system is something like what spike and or Gizmotron do...maybe more close to Gizmotron .
I say this because they both say that they take advantage from randomness and they  are looking past spins!

[Spike!]

Quotes from Jean-Claud:

"The BEST proof and Best example that Roulette can t been beaten is that as U can t find a system to win more than it loses ...U can t also find a system that lose more than the expected -2.7!!!So if u understood my little unexpirienced friend there are NO good or bad systems.here are NO good and bad selectionsALL ARE SAME!!!"

"U are so silly! I already told u that the only way to win is gain advantage with phisics in Roulette(VB-BIAS)"

"PPL that are still trying to beat roulette with maths or patterns are just ppl that are lazy and don t want to learn AP methods OR they just don t have the skills in their DNA."

"Man u are very new in Roulette.As Kelly posted feel free to test any idea of urs...We were there...We did that....
Nothing can beat roul;ette exept Bias and VB"

And on and on and on. Making fun of people who post systems, saying nothing beats roulette except VB, for months and months. And now he posts a SYSTEM? HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!!!!!!!!

[Jean-Claud]

Spike take ur pills and go to sleep...
I already posted that I found it in an other forum and that it is just make me a good sense.

[Spike!]

I found it in an other forum and that it is just make me a good sense.>>>


HAHAHAHAHA!!! After all the misery you've given me, you little hypocrite? You must be joking..

[buffalowizard]

Jean Claude,

Give it some testing as I will too and let us know how you get on

BW

[Jean-Claud]

I already tested it in 3 sessions of 100 spins.

+12
+3
+23

[buffalowizard]

Did you get into much trouble? what was the most chips you got up to?

[Jean-Claud]

Man are u lazy???
just test by urself like I did!~

2 more sessions

1)-6
2)+21

[buffalowizard]

No, just busy Jean Claude

Now do some more testing

[Jean-Claud]

No the next post of tests will be urs.
we are all busy

[medo]

He also mentioned that he has won 30X100 spins sessions all with profit

I think that this system is something like what spike and or Gizmotron do...maybe more close to Gizmotron .
I say this because they both say that they take advantage from randomness and they  are looking past spins!

Who also mentioned winnings of 30x100 sessions?

[Jean-Claud]

The person that made this system.

[medo]

The person that made this system.

Thanks,am just having breakfast with him.

[Jean-Claud]

nice.
tell him that he gave us hopes!

Everyone is looking in this thread like predators!
they need to see more testing resaults!
But they are so lazy that they don t want to test by themselves!

[Jean-Claud]

-