Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Professional Roulette Playing Method & System

Started by gizmotron, July 26, 2010, 02:09:52 AM

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

gizmotron

Quote from: Bayes on July 26, 2010, 01:23:55 PM
Hence Gizmo has to resort to having "students" and not customers. Customers complain and want their money back if the product doesn't perform as advertised, but not every student is guaranteed a diploma, which is Gizmo's get-out clause.

Can't make the strategy work? study harder! practice longer! remember, you paid $1000 for this, it's YOUR responsibility.

What a con.

Lame excuse, more advice from a chicken. Talk about a challenge. This one I started. You guys are so full of it.

Number Six

Quote from: Gizmotron on July 26, 2010, 01:17:29 PM
Number Two, you are clueless. Your math excuse is nothing but a comfort blanket or a crutch to lean on. There is no way that randomness stays in a constant state of house advantage. That would deny randomness its natural proclivities. That means that your excuse for common sense is worthless. Keep piling it up. That's what your good at.

Again, I think you're missing the point or ignoring it. The maths for a trend is exactly the same as the maths for a non-trend, meaning everything is either a trend or it isn't...thus realistically nothing can ever be a trend even when it has passed (then it becomes an illusory pattern you want to see)... none of this is of any use to any human player in real-time, even one with a large brain and lots of processing power. The facts are undeniable to any sane person and already relegate your theories to the status of junk. In short, even though the system might be in an upswing, it's still due to random chance and it's impossible to use junk-maths to make more right decisions than wrong ones because what you're looking for or what you think you see is just a bunch of gibberish based on a classical fallacy. What you seem to be suggesting is selective entries into the game, thus even though the system might be winning, the player is still actually losing.

gizmotron

Quote from: Number Six on July 26, 2010, 01:30:42 PM
The maths for a trend is exactly the same as the maths for a non-trend, meaning everything is either a trend or it isn't...

What makes you think that following a trend is the end of the method? It's just one way to identify what's currently happening. You don't know what to do with current states. You don't have a minimal understanding. Advice from you is like investing in piles of fertilizer. You are the perfect example of not perceiving from one's own experience. Your comments are nothing but lost opinions. They are worthless and incomplete of common sense and reason.

Jean-Claud

Come on men!
Stop this...its enough...we made the point!

He understood that he made a big mistake by proving on his own  that he was a pathetic lier all these years!

gizmotron

Quote from: Jean-Claud on July 26, 2010, 01:36:24 PM
Come on men!
Stop this...its enough...we made the point!

He understood that he made a big mistake by proving on his own  that he was a pathetic lier all these years!

So who is Jean-Claud. He implied that I knew who he was. I don't.

BTW, I didn't make a big mistake. I suspected that in the end you would all turn out to be real chickens. It's absolutely hilarious. You all want a free ride or you will moan and groan like old ladies.

Number Six

Quote from: Gizmotron on July 26, 2010, 01:36:09 PM
What makes you think that following a trend is the end of the method? It's just one way to identify what's currently happening. You don't know what to do with current states. You don't have a minimal understanding. Advice from you is like investing in piles of fertilizer. You are the perfect example of not perceiving from one's own experience. Your comments are nothing but lost opinions. They are worthless and incomplete of common sense and reason.

Point missed, again. There is no "current state", unless you can time travel. If the odds don't change from spin to spin, how can anything be currently happening? The observed string of random outcomes simply becomes bigger and bigger. Clearly you have no concept of what's what. It's like talking to a sociopathic plank. I guess we have to wait until one of your idiot "students" gets it and decides to make world history. Will it be as monumental yet subtle as Wendel's effort? When he did it, no one noticed. They still haven't.  

gizmotron

Quote from: Number Six on July 26, 2010, 01:45:36 PM
There is no "current state", unless you can time travel. If the odds don't change from spin to spin, how can anything be currently happening? The observed string of random outcomes simply becomes bigger and bigger. Clearly you have no concept of what's what. It's like talking to a sociopathic plank. I guess we have to wait until one of your idiot "students" gets it and decides to make world history. Will it be as monumental yet subtle as Wendel's effort? When he did it, no one noticed. They still haven't.  

Oh, name calling. That's impressive. ...and you insist that there is no such thing as a current state. Yeah, you are so informative. I guess this is your fatwa and this is your grand jihad. You mathNazis are almost as funny as serious people.

Number Six

Quote from: Gizmotron on July 26, 2010, 01:51:15 PM
Yeah, you are so informative.

Grass is green you know, I doubt you can convince the world it's pink, even with 10 idiots on your side.

gizmotron

Quote from: Number Six on July 26, 2010, 01:58:10 PM
Grass is green you know, I doubt you can convince the world it's pink, even with 10 idiots on your side.

You should know. You are the captain of all idiots.

Number Six

And you're the admiral.
Hang on, that's Wendel. You're the rear admiral.

Spike!

You and Spike have been promoting for a nice period>>>

Don't include me in this, I knew nothing about it. Gizmo and I rarely talk, I think once in the last 6 weeks maybe. Just because you bozo's think me and Gizmo are somehow connected doesn't mean we are. This is his deal, wising up chumps is never easy and is always more work than its worth. Why he wants to torture himself is a mystery to me. Chumps are chumps for a reason, you might as well try and teach a dog to read a newspaper. Good luck.

gizmotron

I just wanted to prove they are all a bunch of chickens. I proved that. It only cost me $9.95

It's funny too. Everyone wants a free demonstration. Cheapskate chickens. This forum is in the full control of the mathNazis. There is no point in discussing anything here. I just wanted a perfect exit strategy.

Spike!

I suspected you weren't serious when you said you wanted 10 students before you would start. Thats like saying you want 10 people who are afraid of heights to teach mountain climbing to. You know beforehand its never gonna happen. The ones who want to learn the most don't have a thousand dollars, and the ones who have it would never give it to you because they think they already know everything.

mistarlupo

Of course he was serious. Otherwise, he would invite potential "students" in private, without public announcements. Imagine how desperately he needed these $10K that he was forced to give it a try here...

gizmotron

Quote from: mistarlupo on July 26, 2010, 05:40:32 PM
Of course he was serious. Otherwise, he would invite potential "students" in private, without public announcements. Imagine how desperately he needed these $10K that he was forced to give it a try here...

Wrong again dope. I offered it on ebay for a full week before making this announcement here. It was priced at $500 too. I never sold it there either. I did run some idiot off though. He wanted a free demonstration too. The world is full of chickens. Best of all the world can't read randomness and has no clue about current states.

gizmotron

-