ATENTION ATENTION!!! I developed a system that......

[Jean-Claud]

Total sessions 100.(about 4.500 spins)

resaults : 91 W  and  9 L .

+1820      - 450  =Total Profit + 1370

Tomorow is a new age for me...the new age of profecional Roulette player.

I never belived that a math based system would ever win more than it is losing!

Keep searching...don t bother with patters and CWBs and falacies like Martignale......

In order to make money from this game U must think of pure Maths and Possibilities.

Bye

[buffalowizard]

JC,

Could you tell us a little more about your bet selection? 'Maths and possibilities' is a little too vague.

Many thanks

BW

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day,

I never belived that a math based system would ever win more than it is losing!

Keep searching...don t bother with patters and CWBs and fallacies like Martingale......

In order to make money from this game U must think of pure Maths and Possibilities.

I have posted that my unfailing system is based on maths & makes sense,
though again funnily enough you STILL want to make statements about what won't work.

I would say this COULD all be bull & you're just having a bit of 'fun'!!

Glenn.

[buffalowizard]

G'day,

I have posted that my unfailing system is based on maths & makes sense,
though again funnily enough you STILL want to make statements about what won't work.

I would say this COULD all be bull & you're just having a bit of 'fun'!!

Glenn.

Wouldn't be the first time mate

[Steve]

To find a genuine winning method, you really need to understand where the edge comes from. Without an understanding, you would need to "fluke" it and the chances are very remote.

I know nothing about this system, but I do know already there are already tangible and practical methods to beat roulette - not perfect - but good enough. Most people ignore them though, in pursuit of something easier.

[Jean-Claud]

Steve I know perfect level VB and I have also 3 Rcs!
Where are the Conditions to play with??

anyway Steve u know what I am talking about!


PPL

Winning with Maths requaires a LOT of things togeather
Winning target
Stop loss
Probability
Maths
Money Management
Smart and Mild and Safe Progression

and sometimes the Human Brain to go out of the Mechanical part of the system
I mean in the progession part of the system
because the betting positions are remaining same
because u aren t a magician

it is really very easy
but u need to have some expirience in Roulette

[Nathan Detroit]

When to bet and when  not to  bet that is the question.  ( tweaked from William Shakespeare   HAMLET 3/1.)

Nathan Detroit
HAPPY WINNINGS!!!

[Jean-Claud]

When to BET,why to bet and How much to bet...this is teh Pro question

[pins]

why waste time here go and make your fortune.  play it yourself.

[Steve]

Steve I know perfect level VB and I have also 3 Rcs!. Where are the Conditions to play with?

Yes you have a few of forester's computers, which all use the same kind of simplistic algorithm. Well I dont know where the required conditions are for that. I dont know where the ball distance doesnt vary over time. I dont know where the ball doesnt bounce differently for different rotor speeds. VB, for a skilled player, is more versatile than forester's computers, but dont expect to do well if you make the same assumptions as forester.

[Steve]

why waste time here go and make your fortune.  play it yourself.

Cant he do both? I do.

[Jean-Claud]

The Truth is that VB is better than Foresters RCs...lol
But even if ur RC is the best of all in teh planet.....
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/visual-ballistics/why-noone-can-win-with-vb-nowdays/msg116417/?topicseen#msg116417

[Steve]

The Truth is that VB is better than Foresters RCs...lol
But even if ur RC is the best of all in teh planet.....

I know VB for an experienced player is better than forester's devices.

But you have three of the same damn computer and think every computer from different developers is the same. Mighty big assumption. There is nothing a VB player can do that a well designed roulette computer cant do better - simple as that. If you think otherwise, who's loss?

If you think you can beat roulette with mathematics, you are back to square one. But if I'm wrong, it's my loss.

[Jakkalsdraai]

Let's get the record straight. Let's also tell exactly what happened on MSN. Yes. I was at work. Yes I was busy. NO.....it's not true that I didn't understand the instructions simply because there was no instructions. Did he ask me if I had RX, yes he did. And yes I did say I did have RX but I also said I did not have it on the office PC, only on my home PC.

Did he ask me to do a session with him, yes he did. Why didn't I? Simply because I'm done with days sitting for hours on MSN supplying numbers while the other chap marvels in his success or have every excuse inthe World why it's not working now. That is part of the red tape I was referring too. I specifically told him at the time when he wanted to do a session together that I now do have the time and that he could just show me the system and I will go and test it.

Afterall what was said in his post was just that. He said that I must go on MSN and he will give me the system instructions and I must test and post results. Well I did go onto MSN......and that's where it stopped.

Again. If you want to give me the instructions I will test it and give my results to this thread. I'm not going to be dragged around though and waste time. Your call.

[Jean-Claud]

I will not reply at Jakk s   post simply because he didn t had the things I needed in order to explain my system to him.He belive that the only way is Kimo Li stuff...and I can t blame him...if he saw somekind of advantage there then fine by me.

Steve U said that going back into maths is a step back.
Before finding this system I would  agree 100% with u....because I was a fanatic beliver that maths will never make money from this game.


Just run 50-100 spins with RX...any spins!
And look the overal hits in every section...do u see that the Rule of probability makes everything almost equal?
Now find a way to be + even if the Wins are less then the losses.
Simple as that.
There will be times that the Rule will have the exeption(that confirms the Rule)But how many times will this happen?
Well in my sessions tests it happened 9 in 100 sessions

[Jean-Claud]

-