Try it!!

[MiniBaccarat]

G'day Ken,

Just working on getting my system tested on 10 million decisions from random. org,
this is about 2 - 2.5 million placed!

a previous version passed the 1 million placed test.

It will take a while to convert the program to run that many decisions.

It looks like it will be to complicated to play at a B & M without using a PDA!!

Luckily we have a 10 - 5000$ airball here in Sydney where you're allowed to use computers!

Glenn.

[reddwarf]

added contra d'alembert

[reddwarf]

Hi minibaccarat,

you really make me curious. Of course I understand that you want to keep the system to yourself, but can you give a glimpse?

red dwarf

[reddwarf]

a snapshot of a simulated run: in other words, in  a B&M you will almost certain win! (unless you'll keep on using this system)

[pablos]

Could you check it with diffrent table limits ? Cheating table limits we can increase bet per dozen even to 8000 chips.

[reddwarf]

he spreadsheet does not accomodate it yet, but applied time simple dozens (with specific settings) it is as amazing as buju's claims!

I'm quite busy the rest of the week , so maybe I'm able to post a few results next week.

red dwarf

By the way pablos, you are right, table limits do influence the result a lot! Hopefyully next week I'll have an update

[pablos]

I dont know if you used excel for test but I think there are still some mistakes. Maybe I dont understand something but for example: 16 target, 6 divisor and there is unit 4. For me it is not correct. Unit should be 3. Maybe you changed some sets I dont understand or I dont know but that is my opinion. Can you repost or check it ? Check each tablet DZ12 etc for losses. There is weird way the target, divisor and units are changed or maybe I dont understand something.

Maybe it is time to leave it for today

[buju]

i have been looking to the excel very carefully and there is a big mistake.....

[pablos]

Buju where did you find mistake ? For me tablet DZ13 acts weird but I cant find the reason. (but I check ver.6)

[buju]

Buju where did you find mistake ? For me tablet DZ13 acts weird but I cant find the reason.

I will explain in to you everything tomorrow... talk to you tomorrow... by the way we should thank reddwarf for his hard work!

[pablos]

Yes thanks reddwarf for your great effort. I think for me it is also enough for today.

[pablos]

Hello

I try to do my own excel calculator from begining but I need some help. First of all I studied once again example of buju and something is different in my calculations: after 15 came my calculations for Dozens 13 were target 27 divisor 6 and bet 5. I dont know if it is just small mistake or I didn't understand something. I want to know to avoid any mistakes in my calculator. The second: can you tell me what safety divisor break, safety target break and ony other breaks if exists mean ? because I dont know what they mean I cant apply them in my calculations. So far the rules I know are:

Divisor 6, Target 12, increase divisor after two losses in a row, decrease divisor after win, when target for pair of dozens is < 12 start from begin for this pair, after overall profit reset all. Someone can help ? and what are your experiences with this system ?

a snapshot of a simulated run: in other words, in  a B&M you will almost certain win! (unless you'll keep on using this system)

What wonder me most is what was starting capital and what is the probability that that sytem can duoble up the bankroll before it crashed ? If it is more then 50% then it is very good sytem if you know what I mean. Because do we really need a system that never lose or just a system which can win more than lose ?

I made excel calculator but with basics settings. I see that stake can go high fast especially when after many losses few win come in a row then divisor can go down to even 2 and stakes are still high. Some additional settings are needed. Any ideas ? Buju can you tell your all rules you used ?

[buju]

Hello

I try to do my own excel calculator from begining but I need some help. First of all I studied once again example of buju and something is different in my calculations: after 15 came my calculations for Dozens 13 were target 27 divisor 6 and bet 5. I dont know if it is just small mistake or I didn't understand something. I want to know to avoid any mistakes in my calculator. The second: can you tell me what safety divisor break, safety target break and ony other breaks if exists mean ? because I dont know what they mean I cant apply them in my calculations. So far the rules I know are:

Divisor 6, Target 12, increase divisor after two losses in a row, decrease divisor after win, when target for pair of dozens is < 12 start from begin for this pair, after overall profit reset all. Someone can help ? and what are your experiences with this system ?

What wonder me most is what was starting capital and what is the probability that that sytem can duoble up the bankroll before it crashed ? If it is more then 50% then it is very good sytem if you know what I mean. Because do we really need a system that never lose or just a system which can win more than lose ?

I made excel calculator but with basics settings. I see that stake can go high fast especially when after many losses few win come in a row then divisor can go down to even 2 and stakes are still high. Some additional settings are needed. Any ideas ? Buju can you tell your all rules you used ?

yes sometimes the stakes can go high... here is the recent setting I am using to reduce high stake and reduce long string, DIVISOR=6, TARGET= 6, NO SAFTYBREAK! and sometimes I combine with  Contra D'Alembert for last dozen (increase the stake by one chip when you win on last dozen, decrease the stake by one chip when you lose on last dozen.)

I even start betting on both all dozens and all columns together at the same time so that you can reset quickly without getting the stake high! I am still winning.... BUT WE DEFIANTLY NEED EXCEL CALCULATOR!

send me your excel calculator and let me have a look.

[pablos]

I made excel calculator but only with basic rules which I described above. I made it in Open Office but it should work in MS Office as well. Some additional settings are needed because stakes can go really high when divisor go down to even 1. I hope calculations are good but I can't guarantee that. Please check it first on some manual example.

nolinks://uploading.com/files/e525cedc/buju_lanky_dozens_beta.xls/

Added possibility to change divisor and target. Seems to work good but check it first on some manual example:

nolinks://uploading.com/files/mb25bf7c/buju_lanky_dozens_ch_beta.xls/

I don't know why but these links seems to be expired. I attached files to the post. These version I made long time ago but I think these are the same. File ...400.xls is the same as first but has 400 records because first has only 100.

[Number Six]

The divisor shouldn't get that low. To control stakes you need to bring in a new divisor and add a new target when it gets to 4 or 3, thus it becomes a grinding strategy. I have used it extensively in the past and found it to be a moderately effective progression but the bets can still get out of hand in a bad drawdown. It's quite versatile, for example you don't just need to use a divisor of 6, yet it's also in many ways unremarkable, ie it can land you in a lot of trouble.

[Number Six]

-