The Eggleston Betting system

[treborg]

I have to say I'm beginning to think I should give up roulette as one of the worlds unlucky people.

Once again I try a method that other people have apparent success with and bomb out quickly. OK I know losing the progression can happen at any time but with me it always happens more or less straight away or at least to knock me back to square one repeatedly.

I don't see why I should doubt the sincerity of the good people sharing their ideas on this forum but I just feel something is not right.

Robert

[MauiSunset]

I have to say I'm beginning to think I should give up roulette as one of the worlds unlucky people.

Once again I try a method that other people have apparent success with and bomb out quickly. OK I know losing the progression can happen at any time but with me it always happens more or less straight away or at least to knock me back to square one repeatedly.

I don't see why I should doubt the sincerity of the good people sharing their ideas on this forum but I just feel something is not right.

Robert

You're assuming that lots of folks do well at Roulette - nothing could be further from the truth.

If anyone has such a system I've posted instructions on how to demonstrate their system/technique in real time right here - takes 5 minutes to set up and start betting.

Here's the link to my thread: nolinks://vlsroulette.com/bet-selection/if-you-want-to-demonstrate-your-system-in-public/

Assume that folks, who profess to have mastered Roulette, are either fooling you or fooling themselves - a live demo reveals the truth in just seconds.

[harald]

Once again I try a method that other people have apparent success with and bomb out quickly. 

Were did you try it?. . . . at a real roulette or at a rng?


I really want to try it out at a real casino this week. . . but i'm still not sure about 1 thing.
Do you always bet l,r,l,r,l?. . . or do you follow the first movement that comes up after a bet?

I've tried it so far with a total of 1100 spins with both (and more) options. . . if i must go l,r,l,r,l,r then sometimes i have to wait very long for the correct movement. . . once after a right movement i had to wait 26 spins before i got the correct left movement.  To me that sounds wrong.  And i don't see me in a casino sitting at a roulette waiting for 26 spins to make my bet.  But i also thought i read something about you missing spins that drops zero (losing bets) that way.
I know people try to answer me. . . and i know language can be a barrier. . . . but sometimes the more words and explaining you get the higher the barrier can get. . . . . a simple yes or no is understand even by me.
So again i hope someone can spare a simple yes or no for the answer for my question.

[treborg]

I used the method as explained by Colbster.

After a win, say going to the right, I wait for a movement to the left as my trigger. This can sometimes take some time.

After a loss I bet straight away as there has already been an opposite movement.

Some 0's are missed only because you are missing spins.

Hope this helps.

Robert

[olinet]

Problem of this method look at this number and with the progression do you see what happen? not a Failure but ....

24
17
11
5
0
15
26
3
27
23
9
35
18
26
0

[birdhands]

Onlinet,  I've got -1 on those numbers and no need for the progression.

Sam

[birdhands]

Problem of this method look at this number and with the progression do you see what happen? not a Failure but ....

24 track
17 track
11 bet L,H
5   win+1 repeat, bet again L,H
0  lose -1
15 track
26  bet H,L
3  win 0
27 bet H,M
23 win +1
9   track
35 track
18 track
26 bet H,M
0  lose -1

[MauiSunset]

What am I missing here?

You bet $1 on one dozen and $1 on another dozen and spin the wheel.

Statistics is very clear what will happen here - no need to guess:

1/37 betting times Green 0 will hit - lose $2

24/37 betting times you will win $1

And 12/37 betting times you will lose $2

Net net out of 37 betting spins you will win $24 and lose $24 and $2 for green =  a loss of $2 for every 37 betting spins.

Now you might be lucky and not lose $2 or you could be very unlucky and lose more.


If you expect something different then you believe in patterns in random numbers and that has never been proven my any mathematician anywhere.

Now maybe do-it-yourself mathematicians see patterns but real life mathematicians with college degrees don't.

Sorry to be the bearer of reality.....

Personally, I'd have more fun watching paint dry, or 2 spins at 2 numbers since I'm going to lose $2 anyway.

[olinet]

24 col 3
17 col 2 left 2.1
11 col 2 repeat win
5 col 2 repeat win
0 loss
15 col 3 loss right 3,1
26 col 2 loss left 2.1
3 col 3 loss right 3.1
27 repeat win
23col 2 loss left 2.1
9 col 3 loss right 3.1
35 col 2 loss left 2.1
18 col 3 loss right 3.1
26 col 2 loss left 2.1
0 loss

you see the disaster

[col1879]

**********Net net out of 37 betting spins you will win $24 and lose $24 and $2 for green =  a loss of $2 for every 37 betting spins*************

You are hoping to ride a long repeating dozen and keep making lots of +1 profits. After any genuine win or loss you take all money off the table.

[birdhands]

I didn't realize you were betting columns rather than dozens.  First off we usually track after the 0 drops.  Second, the chops are why we need the progression.  It's the same with dozens; sometimes you get 37,2,25,12,31,9,29,1...etc.  it's tough, but not so tough that the system breaks down in the long run.

@Maui,
     If you already read Colbster's explanation on the first page and you still think it's nonsense then maybe you should try a different church.


Sam

[olinet]

if a serie like these happen , what we have to do?

stop when -100? something else?

i lost -100 after 500 test spins.

colbster lost just 3 times , it is amazing!!!!

i want a response from colbster.

thanks

[MauiSunset]

**********Net net out of 37 betting spins you will win $24 and lose $24 and $2 for green =  a loss of $2 for every 37 betting spins*************

You are hoping to ride a long repeating dozen and keep making lots of +1 profits. After any genuine win or loss you take all money off the table.

When I play Roulette at a Vegas casino I am stuck with the American wheel and a 5.3% fee to play the game.  I play Roulette as a break from hours at the BlackJack table - I alternate Red and Black and get as many free drinks as I can get while at the table.

I guess I can now add 2 bets on the 2-to-1 rows and columns and look much more sophisticated than alternating Red and Black while I guzzle down drinks as fast as possible.

Sadly, that's all I use Roulette for - free drinks (which really aren't free with tip and Green(s)).

[col1879]

*************Sadly, that's all I use Roulette for - free drinks (which really aren't free with tip and Green(s)).***********

1st- you don't have to tip. 2nd- your blackjack winnings will cover your roulette losses

[harald]

I used the method as explained by Colbster.

After a win, say going to the right, I wait for a movement to the left as my trigger. This can sometimes take some time.

After a loss I bet straight away as there has already been an opposite movement.

I thought that was the case....to bad...i played that way for some hours now at a real casino and online live roulette.....and sometimes it's very boring to wait 20+ spins for the next correct movement.

[harald]

-