Beating a math game with math

[TurboGenius]

This thread will explain one way to beat a math game using math

Stay tuned - the only delay is running as many examples as possible before posting.

[Buffster]

Yep...This is gonna be good, I know it. I can feel it in my bones.

Yo TG...How ya been ?

Still keeping busy...I see !

Keep us posted.

Buffster

[TwoCatSam]

Well, let's try anyway!!

[Roulette787]

The math of this game is you hit a number 1/37 and you are paid 36 (35+1), in the long term (what counts). Therefore, the player has a negative expectancy of 2,70%.

You cannot beat the math of this game with your gambler's fallacies on past numbers.

Then why are you here anyway?

[cps10]

I agree...let's try anyway. I think TG has much more experience than most...let's take a swipe at it!

All ears TG! Or eyes I reckon!

[Lanky]

Hi Turbo

Thanks a lot for what you are about to share with us Mate.

I remember Victor telling me this once.

""when the student is ready the teaching will come ""

It would appear that there are some of us that want to learn & Improve.

And there are some that would Boo Santa Clause.

Good On Ya Mate

Lanky

[TurboGenius]

Bago is correct - the house has the math advantage over the player.

However, there are ways to play so that the player's balance stays right
around that "edge" - That is what I'll show with this method - and it will
make more sense perhaps   The player's balance will wander in both directions
and stopping when a profit is reached is possible.

The house "edge" is small - only 1 unit per cycle of 37 spins (or 38).
so 1/37th of 1 unit per spin (very small)
This is simple to overcome when done properly.

[cps10]

TG

Would that include taking advantage of wins after a loss to recover that 1 unit every cycle?

Keith

[ChickenDinner]

Hi Turbo,

Like everyone else, I'm looking forward to hearing this method.

Bago is obviously right about the math, but as nothing in the universe is truely random - as the great philosophers have claimed - it seems plausible that the math can be manipulated to create a system where you only lose if you are very unlucky (a method that is about as close to a HG as mathmatically possible).

Bring it on!

CD

[rev]

  Hi T-Nice 2 see ya back around-On average how many unit's per cycle does your new method average?? P.Mail await's u

[TurboGenius]

It's coming Bago, roulette is on the major back burner at the moment

Glad to see you here though, you always bring the "anti-turbo" attitude which
does little but is indeed entertaining to read.

[Herb]

He does help keep the ideas in the real world.

[Ray]

Well, let's try anyway!!

well said twocat.lol 

[Boo_Ray]

Any news about system?

[JHM]

Yes, Bago is right and a little childish .

I'm very curious TG.
If it's true what you say. If every roulette player would play this way the casino's edge would be gone  .

Waiting patiently

[JHM]

-