The RNG doesn't have a memory?

[JohnBoy26]

Tracking systems tend not to work on a live casino so I've heard.   But I have read on many forums that in an online casino, RNGs are programmed so that each number will appear the same number of times as the other over a long period of time.   Is this true?  If we knew over what kind of time scale would we not be able to make a system that accomadates this?  Maybe I've got this all wrong.   It's just a thought.

[MauiSunset]

Tracking systems tend not to work on a live casino so I've heard.   But I have read on many forums that in an online casino, RNGs are programmed so that each number will appear the same number of times as the other over a long period of time.   Is this true?  If we knew over what kind of time scale would we not be able to make a system that accomadates this?  Maybe I've got this all wrong.   It's just a thought.

NO!

A RNG is just an equation that has no memory at all.  Over a very long time, say millions of spun numbers the sequence will start over unless the "seed" for the RNG is replaced occasionally.  In normal play that would be many years.

Rest assured that RNGs produce random numbers which have no information or predictive data in them.

[hermes]

RNGs don't have a memories but the owner operators have! Count on that before you show them real money!
Hermes

[RobbieD]

RNG software by Playtech, etc. , is simply that - software, and can therefore be manipulated by the Casinos.

All the systems posted on this Forum are, in the most part, based on some kind of logic - unfortunately they are battling against software which is not based on logic.  You are dealing with greedy Casino owners who can manipulate their income.

You will never beat that.

[Ulysses]

I bet this guy doesn't think RNG is rigged after he won £145,000.00 on betfairs playtech roulette. He did design an ingenious roulette system remember, much better than what any of us could or ever come up with. 

nolinks://nolinks.onlinecasinoreports.com/news/specialreports/2010/11/4/roulette-winner-played-football-player-number.php

What we can all learn from this is not to over complicate systems and keep it simple.

[darrynf]

i really dont see why casinos need to cheat, not many people can beat rng anyway, and because of that they think its cheating.
i dont believe all casinos cheat as i have won money from rng and live.

its not easey to do but its possible.

[harald]

Tracking systems tend not to work on a live casino so I've heard.   But I have read on many forums that in an online casino, RNGs are programmed so that each number will appear the same number of times as the other over a long period of time.   Is this true?  If we knew over what kind of time scale would we not be able to make a system that accomadates this?  Maybe I've got this all wrong.   It's just a thought.

I think rng's are not random. It looks at your bets and bankroll. So there's no system for it.

Sometimes you may see a picture of some1 winning from roulette but who say it's from an rng?...most rng's have low tablelimits......and how many pictures do you see in total? Were are the pictures of all those people who say they have a winning system for rng's? If a picture of a rng winner is indeed true then in my mind that player won because the casino thinks it's time for a winner. People who say they have a winning system always say they don't want to show proof or win big so they don't get to much attention. So they can keep winning in the future. But think about that. On one hand you have the dude on the picture with 145.000 and on the other hand you have some1 who claim to have won 20 in 4 months with a winning system. If they truly have a winning system then in my mind they are not playing it smart. If I had a winning system I would have won a couple of 145.000 and retire. After I retire I put up my 'system' here at once so you all can profit from it. But again all those people with so called systems for rng have never ever put up any kind of proof. And the people who say rng's are random and fair also have no proof of that. Such proof is ofcourse hard to get because how would you proof that? And how would you proof it's not. Well to proof it's not is very easy...at least it was for me.

Do what you want but I say stay away from rng...better play live wheel or go to a real casino.
I've put a topic here why I do think most rng's are not random as my way of proof. If you read that topic you can clearly see some people attacking the person who started the topic instead of the proof. They have no proof what so ever that it's random and fair and they do not try my proof for themself. Why do they do that?...what's their gain from that? Why do they take the time to response? Do they wanna help others to win money from rng's? Do they have any kind of proof for what they are saying? No and no. Think about that for a minute. Also think about what is my gain to say this? Do I work for those casino's and am I scared for the systems on this forum? So I willingly say it's not random in the hope people won't play their winning systems? No and no again.
Trust me the best proof is your own eyes and brain. And a simple way of proven to yourself that rng roulette is not random and fair is this:

Pick any number...let's say 7 and bet on it progressive with the min amount (1c if possible).
Now follow let's say 25/50 spins and count how many times that number came.
Now bet progressive on all the numbers but 7.
Again follow 25/50 spins and trust me you will see so many 7s drop that it's just ridiculous.
Ofcourse you can also do this with colours, dozens etc etc.

Wanna see something like 10 reds, zero and 11 reds in a row? Do 20 random bets on numbers and dozens or whatever...then do 30 progressive bets on black...voila there's your 10 reds a zero and 11 reds in a row....now do 43 random bets....then do 30 progressive bets on black....voila there's your 10 reds a zero and 11 reds again....now do only 2 random bets...then do 30 progressive bets on black and voila.....etc etc

On rng's you can make numbers, colours, dozens etc etc appear at will...if that's not proof of not being random and fair then what is?

[Ulysses]

Do what you want but I say stay away from rng...better play live wheel or go to a real casino.
I've put a topic here why I do think most rng's are not random as my way of proof. If you read that topic you can clearly see some people attacking the person who started the topic instead of the proof. They have no proof what so ever that it's random and fair and they do not try my proof for themself. Why do they do that?...what's their gain from that? Why do they take the time to response? Do they wanna help others to win money from rng's? Do they have any kind of proof for what they are saying? No and no. Think about that for a minute.

Look at it this way, no one truly knows if the online casino your playing in is rigged or not. What you can do is play at the ones that pay you out your winnings and ones that show a decent record of winners. Like Victor Chandler as an example publishes its big monthly rng and live winners. nolinks://nolinks.victorchandler.com/vccasino/en-gb/pages/show/76911-big-winners

Or if you are completely traumatized by online gaming then don't play em. Play in a walk in casino. Simples. I reckon most people lose playing rng because of the high speed, greed and dodgy casinos they play in with reversing withdrawals because the casino deliberately delays their cashouts.

[BangkokJEDI]

I heard most RNG's use atomospheric noise to produce the number.   

[Ulysses]

I heard most RNG's use atmospheric noise to produce the number.   

Random.org does but most casinos don't. Some Rival software casinos do use this method but Rival 'white label ' casinos are currently rogued like This is Vegas, Rich casino and about 30 more.

[harald]

Look at it this way, no one truly knows if the online casino your playing in is rigged or not. What you can do is play at the ones that pay you out your winnings and ones that show a decent record of winners. Like Victor Chandler as an example publishes its big monthly rng and live winners. nolinks://nolinks.victorchandler.com/vccasino/en-gb/pages/show/76911-big-winners

I'm not talking about casino's...i'm talking about rng roulette.

Or if you are completely traumatized by online gaming then don't play em. Play in a walk in casino. Simples. I reckon most people lose playing rng because of the high speed, greed and dodgy casinos they play in with reversing withdrawals because the casino deliberately delays their cashouts.

?......i don't know why you say things like that.
I'm not against online gaming...i play online live wheel roulette daily and have no problem with that...i play online slots daily and have no problem with that.....and trust me the euro's i lost with rng is no problem...i'm not a schoolboy who plays his pocketmoney in the weekends....i gamble with money that i don't use for other things....so i'm not traumatized. Also that 60 euro has gave me 100% proof that rng roulette is not random and not fair. That's very cheap for a 100% proof of something in the gamblingworld.

Like i said so many times by now.....there are so many people with experience and printscreens of non randomness etc and just a handfull of people who say it's fair but have no proof what so ever. Why is that small group 'attacking' everyone who says otherwise? What do you have to gain? In my mind only 2 kinds of persons gain from that....persons who work for or own a casino...and people who think they have a winning system for rng....and are affraid that the proof that rng is not random and fair also proofs that their winning system is bull....now whats realy the problem with that?...loosing face? Affraid that others on this forum won't take you serious anymore?
But how serious do you think most people take those who only keep saying they have a winning system but don't tell what it is...and also don't have any kind of proof for it? If my proof become also the proof of those who think they have a winning system then wouldn't they be 1 step closer to a real winning system?

Again i realy like to know why do people like you respond like this? Why the 'attackmode'? Why putting words in other peoples mounths en say things without even try evidence that is presented to you on a silver plattern? Whats your gain from that?

[Mike]

Like I said so many times by now.....there are so many people with experience and printscreens of non randomness etc and just a handfull of people who say it's fair but have no proof what so ever. Why is that small group 'attacking' everyone who says otherwise? What do you have to gain? In my mind only 2 kinds of persons gain from that....persons who work for or own a casino...and people who think they have a winning system for rng....and are affraid that the proof that rng is not random and fair also proofs that their winning system is bull....now whats realy the problem with that?...losing face? Affraid that others on this forum won't take you serious anymore?

Again I realy like to know why do people like you respond like this? Why the 'attackmode'? Why putting words in other peoples mounths en say things without even try evidence that is presented to you on a silver plattern? Whats your gain from that?

For one thing, what you call "proof" isn't what you think it is. It isn't black and white as you suggest. The only place for that kind of proof is in mathematics where you can "prove" that 1 + 1 = 2. There is only evidence for and against which may be strong or weak or anywhere in between.

Just because there are more people who say OCs are cheating than not doesn't mean anything, because you have to look at the reasons why this is the case. Most players lose in the long run, so it follows that there will be more complainers than non-complainers, especially since people like to blame something outside themselves, rather than take responsibility for their lack of discipline or ignorance.

It would be better if you had some numbers or statistics to back up your claims; making sweeping statements isn't very helpful. You might have more of a case if you gave some hard evidence.

[Zindrod]

Hi Mike.  I think that yes.  RNG is crooked.  Also I believe it is not beatable even if they were straight.  Where you can see it is with the ridiculous odds you get with RNG compared to live wheels.  There is a reason for that. 

[Mike]

I don't believe it's beatable either, but I've yet to see any evidence that it's crooked. What do you mean by "ridiculous odds"? The odds are the same whether it's RNG or live wheel.

[Ulysses]

I'm not against online gaming...I play online live wheel roulette daily and have no problem with that...I play online slots daily and have no problem with that.....

If your playing online every day you might be developing a gambling addiction. I would take a break from it, even if your doing really well. It usually takes a turn for the worst later on, that's the nature of gambling. 

[Ulysses]

-