The Consistent Profit Roulette System By Chuck Sutton.

[benfica]

roulette is finish to me today i tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or i dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there i go to poker thats the only place i can win

[Boo_Ray]

benfica are you playing live roulette?

[benfica]

yes it was live roulette at eurogrand

[JHM]

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

In the system, Chuck Sutton says that you will lose. Approx. 1 in 66 times. Maybe you had just bad luck.

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

I don't like eurogrand. I played there. When I wanted to collect money money to my bank, I had to make at least $ 500,- for a direct transfer. And more of that shit. I couldn't transfer the money to moneybookers because I didnd't deposit via Moneybookers. So I kept playing, lost my money and never go there again.

But then again, maybe the system isn't that good.

I'm still testing (@ dublinbet) and so far looks pretty good.

[See_Jerek]

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

In the system, Chuck Sutton says that you will lose. Approx. 1 in 66 times. Maybe you had just bad luck.

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

I don't like eurogrand. I played there. When I wanted to collect money money to my bank, I had to make at least $ 500,- for a direct transfer. And more of that shit. I couldn't transfer the money to moneybookers because I didnd't deposit via Moneybookers. So I kept playing, lost my money and never go there again.

But then again, maybe the system isn't that good.

I'm still testing (@ dublinbet) and so far looks pretty good.

Hello JHM,

How did it turn out?Is it usable?

[JHM]

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

In the system, Chuck Sutton says that you will lose. Approx. 1 in 66 times. Maybe you had just bad luck.

roulette is finish to me today I tested this won 1st game 2 game then section D missed for 9 spins so lets go progression 111223457912 boom there it all gone
or I dont have any luck or im cheated like the hell
there I go to poker thats the only place I can win

I don't like eurogrand. I played there. When I wanted to collect money money to my bank, I had to make at least $ 500,- for a direct transfer. And more of that shit. I couldn't transfer the money to moneybookers because I didnd't deposit via Moneybookers. So I kept playing, lost my money and never go there again.

But then again, maybe the system isn't that good.

I'm still testing (@ dublinbet) and so far looks pretty good.

Hello JHM,

How did it turn out?Is it usable?

I tested it, in the end it didn't.

For the testing see nolinks://vlsroulette.com/testing-zone/cpr-(consistent-profit-roulette)/

[ryan08]

hi,

maybe after a loss play the session to win some money back instead, because those 3 losses where you quit after loss and came back, that is alot more likely to happen if you join at random points throughout the day, of course there is always the chance you can get 3 losses in close succession in one session of betting but i think it would be alot rarer for that to happen.

3 losses in quick succession from 3 different sessions, personally i would put it down to bad timing joining the table rather than a system failure, would you agree?

br,
ryan

[JHM]

hi,

maybe after a loss play the session to win some money back instead, because those 3 losses where you quit after loss and came back, that is alot more likely to happen if you join at random points throughout the day, of course there is always the chance you can get 3 losses in close succession in one session of betting but I think it would be alot rarer for that to happen.

3 losses in quick succession from 3 different sessions, personally I would put it down to bad timing joining the table rather than a system failure, would you agree?

br,
ryan

I can't agree and I can't disagree. In testing mode you can see how much wins I had. Even a few close calls there. The loss in units is to big when you loose compare to the wins.

Personally I have found out I'm not a progression player but a flat better. For some it works, Kingspin here does play the system with succes. Ask him.

[See_Jerek]

hi,

maybe after a loss play the session to win some money back instead, because those 3 losses where you quit after loss and came back, that is alot more likely to happen if you join at random points throughout the day, of course there is always the chance you can get 3 losses in close succession in one session of betting but I think it would be alot rarer for that to happen.

3 losses in quick succession from 3 different sessions, personally I would put it down to bad timing joining the table rather than a system failure, would you agree?

br,
ryan

I can't agree and I can't disagree. In testing mode you can see how much wins I had. Even a few close calls there. The loss in units is to big when you loose compare to the wins.

Personally I have found out I'm not a progression player but a flat better. For some it works, Kingspin here does play the system with succes. Ask him.

No he didn't he lose a lot of money on it recently.I was shocked to hear the amount.I am not a fan of progression as well since you are a flat better,what kind of systems do you think is effective in your opinion.I would like to learn more too just can't find anything suitable

[insidebet]

Hello guys,

I may be mistaken but this very similar to John Solitude's Raindrop system.  I have played Raindrop for a little while...until I dropped my pants!  I had an 8 number sector go cold for 31 spins.  I stopped there. It took another 15 spins before it got a hit.  That a walloping 45 spins that went cold.

These streaks happen way too often.  This system relies on the assumption that it has gone cold for "too long", it has to hit now.  Again, this has been done over and over and again in various forms: numbers, streets, dozens, etc.

Whenever you run this on RX for a few thousand spins it always fail.  Sure you are very likely to win for a while (as I did).  But if you plan to play quite often, this not the solution.

It has been proven that running and falling on your nose hurts.  How many times we have to do the same thing before trying something different?

I have spoken to Solitude himself.  He told me he does not play his system,  that it does NOT win long term.  His system has been coded on RX.  Run it. You will see for yourself.

We have a very potent friend: the computer.  We should use it more.  More on that in a near future.

Insidebet

[See_Jerek]

Hello guys,

I may be mistaken but this very similar to John Solitude's Raindrop system.  I have played Raindrop for a little while...until I dropped my pants!  I had an 8 number sector go cold for 31 spins.  I stopped there. It took another 15 spins before it got a hit.  That a walloping 45 spins that went cold.

These streaks happen way too often.  This system relies on the assumption that it has gone cold for "too long", it has to hit now.  Again, this has been done over and over and again in various forms: numbers, streets, dozens, etc.

Whenever you run this on RX for a few thousand spins it always fail.  Sure you are very likely to win for a while (as I did).  But if you plan to play quite often, this not the solution.

It has been proven that running and falling on your nose hurts.  How many times we have to do the same thing before trying something different?

I have spoken to Solitude himself.  He told me he does not play his system,  that it does NOT win long term.  His system has been coded on RX.  Run it. You will see for yourself.

We have a very potent friend: the computer.  We should use it more.  More on that in a near future.

Insidebet

Then what system does John play do you have any idea

[Kingspin]

Jerek the reason i lost the money was because i bottled out on some of the higher progressions , what made it worse was the bet would have won on the next spin , Confidence was low.  i would have been in a much better position to win if i had gone all the way with the progressions.  Another thing that went wrong for me was that i bet a wrong number on a section , i bet wrong number 36 when i should have bet  number 34 and guess what number 34 hit  which cost me hundreds on one stupid mistake.  I carried on playing to win back the losses but the wheel was a pig to me with it going all the way to towards the big progressions so again i bottled out and was sick when the winning sector would have hit on the very next spin.  I put my bad session down to bad luck and stupid mistakes , bad timing. Some days its easy to make 250 an hour with this system , you have to wait for 12 misses minimum to play safe though , 9 misses  before betting is way too risky i have found this out with practice. Basically the cpr system will make a lot of money fast or it will be a long hard slog. I still intend to play it but i am looking for better system than this , its no holy grail.  You need to bet on 0 too to make it work .

[JHM]

hi,

maybe after a loss play the session to win some money back instead, because those 3 losses where you quit after loss and came back, that is alot more likely to happen if you join at random points throughout the day, of course there is always the chance you can get 3 losses in close succession in one session of betting but I think it would be alot rarer for that to happen.

3 losses in quick succession from 3 different sessions, personally I would put it down to bad timing joining the table rather than a system failure, would you agree?

br,
ryan

I can't agree and I can't disagree. In testing mode you can see how much wins I had. Even a few close calls there. The loss in units is to big when you loose compare to the wins.

Personally I have found out I'm not a progression player but a flat better. For some it works, Kingspin here does play the system with succes. Ask him.

No he didn't he lose a lot of money on it recently.I was shocked to hear the amount.I am not a fan of progression as well since you are a flat better,what kind of systems do you think is effective in your opinion.I would like to learn more too just can't find anything suitable

In the testing Area you can see Twocatsam is testing the Murph / 2selecta system with good results. Also Winkel's ''G.U.T.'' seems to be winning more than losing. Both use flat bets.

[insidebet]

See_jerek

Last I talked to Solitude, he wasn't into Roulette anymore.  He said it was a lot easier for him to make money playing Poker.

Insider

[See_Jerek]

hi,

maybe after a loss play the session to win some money back instead, because those 3 losses where you quit after loss and came back, that is alot more likely to happen if you join at random points throughout the day, of course there is always the chance you can get 3 losses in close succession in one session of betting but I think it would be alot rarer for that to happen.

3 losses in quick succession from 3 different sessions, personally I would put it down to bad timing joining the table rather than a system failure, would you agree?

br,
ryan

I can't agree and I can't disagree. In testing mode you can see how much wins I had. Even a few close calls there. The loss in units is to big when you loose compare to the wins.

Personally I have found out I'm not a progression player but a flat better. For some it works, Kingspin here does play the system with succes. Ask him.

No he didn't he lose a lot of money on it recently.I was shocked to hear the amount.I am not a fan of progression as well since you are a flat better,what kind of systems do you think is effective in your opinion.I would like to learn more too just can't find anything suitable

In the testing Area you can see Twocatsam is testing the Murph / 2selecta system with good results. Also Winkel's ''G.U.T.'' seems to be winning more than losing. Both use flat bets.

I am aware about the GUT thanks for recommending 2selecta system.

[See_Jerek]

-