The Consistent Profit Roulette System By Chuck Sutton.

[birdhands]

another fascinating, promising, and suddenly dead thread.  Are any of you still out there?  Does anyone play this?  Kingspin, do you still play your Magical Splits system?

Sam

[Kingspin]

The cpr roulette is  very good but has 2 disadvantages 1 is all the tracking involved which can become tiring over many games and 2 the progression needs to be played all the way to the very end.  When playing for real money it is often tempting to cut short the progression in which case the system fails big time.  On the the other hand if the progression is played all the way to the very end then for sure you will win many games.

Some one mentioned here on this thread about waiting for a 9 number section to miss at least 9 times but do not bet the 9 number sector till it actually hits then and only then we start the progression ,which I think is a safer much better bet. Lets say for instance a 9 number section misses 14 times then hits, this section is virtually a guaranteed hit again within the long progression shown earlier in topic.

I used to have it on disc in pdf but have lost it , the links are dead to the free pdf does any one have a link to it?

[birdhands]

Thanks for the reply.  And what about you Magical Splits system?

I'm also curious what you think about the 600% in six days dozens system (misfiled, should be in full roulette systems); we could use some progression ideas.

Sam

[Kingspin]

Try my lucky horse shoe birdhands, it's a favourite to win.  

The 600% in six days is a laugh mate 

[rick_gene]

HI,

anyone manage to win from using those system above?
or losing in long run?
pls share

[iggiv]

it has been said for long time that no system based on sleepers can win consistently unless extreme luck is involved.

there is no end to how long the sleep may occur

[ASM]

Hi Kingspin,

Been reading a lot of your discussions on this CPR system.  I have been messing around with it a lot online just playing free games.  So far it is worked out quite well until i visited ivegas and really had a scare when once i started betting on a section of 9 numbers it missed over 20 times.  I do have to say that is the first time that has happened to me.  I was wondering wich sites you like to play and how to know which ones are and which are rng since they all show the wheel.  I am quite new at this so if you could explain that to me it would be appreciated and maybe give me a list of online sites you like to play at.  Like i said i have just been experimenting and haven't actually bet real money yet for the simple fact that i have the fear that maybe the free games are rigged trying to get you to bet for real money.  Any suggestions or tips you may have to offer i would appreciate it.

[foreverBOB]

I prefer playing the partner play betting on 1 of the 3 sections containing 12 nrs.
I wait for 10, sometimes 12 instead of 9 no hits in that sector and then just go for that dangerous progression untill 22units.
I am sure its a good system, but be aware that sometimes you will lose your game.

Bob

[pablos]

Some time ago I found some statistics from RNG ( 1 milion spins) and 1 dozen slept longest for 35 spins. 9 numbers is less so I think it can sleep longer. I know that RNG it is not the same as live roulette but even in live roulette I had once 21 spins without one dozen so without 9 numbers the serie could be longer. The system looks interesting. King spin you uploaded useful picture with numbers but it is for 2 zeros wheel right ? I almost mistook, glad I didn't start to play for real. Kingspin do you still play this system and do you play that you wait 10 times without one sector and then start to bet using conservative progression or you wait until this sector hit once and then start betting because you wrote that this second way is better ? Do you still play this system with success ? I think that to fastest play it would be good to code this system and track every 9 neighbour numbers wherever thay are on the wheel which means 37 sectors I think it is hard to do but it could be useful.

[darrynf]

hi kingspin,

I made a similar system that has 4 sectors and based on 9 numbers, but i didnt base it on sleepers or progression.

it did well in the testing and it still new but it worked.
I got a test done for 100,000 spins and the highest a sleeper went was 37, so i wouldnt play this system.

maybe play the 9 numbers that have the gighest hit, it might help you, thats how i play mine and i use no progression at all and it seems to make profit.

[pablos]

I have different idea how to speed up the game and track many sector at the same time. All we need is to take a graph of the wheel or write the numbers in the same order like on the wheel than we wait for example 12 spins and sign every number which was hit on the graph then when we have for example sector which consist from 9 or more neihbours numbers without hit then we can start betting on them. I had this idea after reading the topic "know when to quit" system who waited for example 12 spins and started to bet on the largest sector. I think that good idea about that is that we can wait for more than 12 spins like for example 15 or more and dont have to wait long. If we have larger sector than 9 we can just remove few numbers and choose 9 neigbours numbers, if we have lower sector than we just have to start again. What do you think about it ? I think that this way it is easy to find any sleeping sector in short time.

[hermes]

Roulette is very flexible unpredictable game and cannot be won with (4) rigid sectors. They must be a liquid one like that one from Raindrop.  If the roulette is ever changing game the system must be ever changing also, like chameleon.
Cheers Hermes

[darrynf]

Roulette is very flexible unpredictable game and cannot be won with (4) rigid sectors. They must be a liquid one like that one from Raindrop.  If the roulette is ever changing game the system must be ever changing also, like chameleon.
Cheers Hermes

not unless its based on the wheel then it wouldnt need to change.

the more sectors you have dosent mean you will win more either. the thing is roulette isnt a ever changing game, you can play it an infinity ways but the game is never changing. theres only ever 37 outcomes at the most for the highest (numbers).
well thats how i see it, feel free to tell me im wrong

[darrynf]

Roulette is very flexible unpredictable game and cannot be won with (4) rigid sectors. They must be a liquid one like that one from Raindrop.  If the roulette is ever changing game the system must be ever changing also, like chameleon.
Cheers Hermes

havent you made a system baed on 3 sectors, dozens and collumns, thats kind of saying your system wont work.

out of 3 dozens there is only three outcomes, how you play it is a different matter.
H, M or L will hit (only 3 outcomes), we just can never guess which one will hit just like 37 numbers or e/c's (only two outcomes)

[GLC]

You cannot play CPR without losing periodically.  Nobody knows for sure if in the long run the wins stay ahead of the losses.  If you had program that could test it against 1000000000000000s of spins, it would lose..

Of everyone who plays it most will eventually lose, some will no doubt win.

Which will you be?

George

[GLC]

-