It is just a matter of knowing what the wheel is throwing at the time.

[ll l ll l lll ll]

Not at all. Unlike Gizmo, I believe there in no 'favorable' time to play. If you think its favorable, it means you think you know whats coming in the next sequence of spins. And you can't possibly know.

Point is, whenever you do play, it is the chop you play and not the streak.

[cheese]

Point is, whenever you do play, it is the chop you play and not the streak.

I don't play either in that I don't look for either one. I guess its hard to ignore 12 reds in a row, but how often does that happen.

[gizmotron]

Not at all. Unlike Gizmo, I believe there in no 'favorable' time to play. If you think its favorable, it means you think you know whats coming in the next sequence of spins. And you can't possibly know.

There it is again. You think I 'm assuming some kind of prediction here. I'm not. I never think I know what's coming next. But I do know that there is no evidence that a change has occurred yet. The last spin still confirms that the trend is still consistent. Can you see the difference? I can. Perhaps I can't communicate it? My evidence that the trend has not changed is 100% accurate. There is no chance for error.

[cheese]

There it is again. You think I 'm assuming some kind of prediction here. I'm not. I never think I know what's coming next. My evidence that the trend has not changed is 100% accurate. There is no chance for error.

Yesterday, in the other thread, you're excuse for losing was the bet should have won, it was a rare circumstance. Thats prediction, thats thinking you know the next outcome and being blown away when you're wrong. You should listen more to Yogi Bera, who said: "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future."

[VKM]

@ Gizmo,

Spike believes that there is no 'favorable' time to play and if he thinks it's favorable, it means he thinks he knows what's coming in the next sequence of spins.  And he can't possibly know.
He also believes that if he continues to play like he currently plays then he will continue to win.

I know that not every one is going to recognize the depth of the inconsistency there, but I'm pretty that sure you will.


Gizmo, you said... "There it is again. You think I 'm assuming some kind of prediction here. I'm not. I never think I know what's coming next. But I do know that there is no evidence that a change has occurred yet. The last spin still confirms that the trend is still consistent. Can you see the difference? I can. Perhaps I can't communicate it? My evidence that the trend has not changed is 100% accurate. There is no chance for error."

I understand what you're saying and I agree with it.  Your ability to communicate it is fine.  I know that sometimes it seems like you're beating your head against a wall, (but it's actually the outside of the box... if you know what I mean.)  Hang in there.


VKM

 

[cheese]

Spike believes that there is no 'favorable' time to play and if he thinks it's favorable>>


But its never favorable, the whole notion is silliness.


Gizmo, you said... "There it is again. You think I 'm assuming some kind of prediction here. I'm not. I never think I know what's coming next.

Sure you do, you just said so yesterday, when you flunked your own test.

VKM said: I know that sometimes it seems like you're beating your head against a wall, (but it's actually the outside of the box... if you know what I mean.)  Hang in there.>>>

Yes, he'll hang in there, he has no choice. He'll keep trying till he finally beats the game. Or doesn't.





 

[Zindrod]

I play two tables with one my favourite methods and the casino has never bothered me about it. In fact they let me put my rewards card in one table and leave it in there earning points while I walk and play between the two.

  Bombus, he most probably played color (one table) on both tables! Should play cash chips. Then there is no problem except of course if someone else is playing cash chips too. Then they might frown about it and not allow your bet. If so and the other guy is playing cash 5's then just play cash 10's.

[cheese]

  Bombus, he most probably played color (one table) on both tables!

Have you ever tried to take roulette chips away from the table you're on and bet them on another table? Try it sometime and let us know what they did to you.

[Zindrod]

That is exactly my point Cheese.

If you play color usually each table's number is on that color. So you are not allowed to play table 1's $5 color chips on Table 2 for instant. That is why I say you should play cash chips which is allowed on all tables except if there already is a player playing with the same cash chips on the same table you want to place on.

[cheese]

That is why I say you should play cash chips which is allowed on all tables

I don't mean to be rude, but who exactly do you think doesn't already know this? If you've played any casino games at all, you know the difference between casino chips and roulette chips. At least I think you would...

[Zindrod]

I don't mean to be rude, but who exactly do you think doesn't already know this? If you've played any casino games at all, you know the difference between casino chips and roulette chips. At least I think you would...

lol, exactly, I also thought everyone knew! Funny thing is I have seen people bet with color on 2-3 tables! And the dealers miss it until payout has to be made and there are two pink chip players! 

My point is though that no casino will stop you from playing as many tables as you wish as long as it's cash chips and usually as long as other players are not playing cash chips already. They do allow more than one guy with cash chips sometimes but they sure a shell do not like it. 

[bombus]

  Bombus, he most probably played color (one table) on both tables! Should play cash chips. Then there is no problem except of course if someone else is playing cash chips too. Then they might frown about it and not allow your bet. If so and the other guy is playing cash 5's then just play cash 10's.

Colour chips - yes that would do it.

I only ever play cash chips.

[cheese]

My point is though that no casino will stop you from playing as many tables as you wish

They just don't let you play them at the same TIME, thats the point. They won't let you make a bet on one table and run over and make a bet on another table. Most casinos will pull your bet if you leave the table at all, if you have a bet placed. I know, it happened to me all over Vegas and in most local casinos.

[Zindrod]

They just don't let you play them at the same TIME, thats the point. They won't let you make a bet on one table and run over and make a bet on another table. Most casinos will pull your bet if you leave the table at all, if you have a bet placed. I know, it happened to me all over Vegas and in most local casinos.

Haven't happened to me. I suppose it depends where you play.

[gizmotron]

Yesterday, in the other thread, you're excuse for losing was the bet should have won, it was a rare circumstance. Thats prediction, thats thinking you know the next outcome and being blown away when you're wrong. You should listen more to Yogi Bear, who said: "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future."

Yeah right. You are almost as smart as a fence post. I had a 98.5 percent chance of getting that win. That's rare enough for me when it lost. Perhaps there are stats for ("pic-a-nic baskets"). I'll bet they are always 72%. Way to go Boo Boo Bear. 

[gizmotron]

-