Follow probability as it moves

[Psolaras]

I was testing this morning something that went preety good!
 I always wanted to make a system with a Br that would n be more than 50 chips.So If I would lose 1 session then it would be easier to cover it with the next session plays.

Anyway I will post the system-method and we can have descussion after we will see how it goes with testing and if it can be tweeked then fine.

We watch the Dozens and Colums.
We see how they are developing.
we are betting on the less hited Dozen and/or Column.
we are not betting flat(I will explain how we are betting with the example I am gona gine right now)

Example

Dozens
Doz 1=4 Hits
Doz 2=1 Hit
Doz 3=3 Hits

We are betting ALWAYS at the dozen with the less Hits...So in our example this is the Doz 2
We are watching which is the next dozen with the less hits...This is Doz 3.....
So we Ignore the doz with the Most Hits....(Doz1)
So we have doz 2(betting doz) 1 hit - doz 3 3 hits = the next bet would be  2 chips on the doz 2.

an other example

doz1  10 hits
doz2  7 hits
doz3  14 hits

we will bet on the doz 2 (less hits) 3 chips....because  doz 1 - doz 2= 3chips(deference).....we ignore the doz 1 that has the most hits......

WE DO THE SAME THING FOR THE COLUMS....AND WE ARE BETTING BOTH OF THEM!!!!!(doz and col)
WHEN IN 1 SPIN WE HAVE 2 OR 3 DOZ OR COL WITH EQUAL HITS THEN WE DO NOT BET THIS DOZ OR COL BUT WE BET ON THE OTHER DOZ OR COL THAT HAS DEFERENCES IN HITS(LIKE THE ABOVE RULES)

I hope u got it by now...its very easy to be played and we are betting in every spin.
A br of 50 chips would be more than enough.
My winning target would be 20 chips per session ...so 3 W and 1 L would make us be +10 chips.

aND REMEMBER PLEASE........We if we lose 1 battle(session) we didn t lost the war(long run)

Thank you.

[Psolaras]

I am testing the method and it is runnung preety well!
 I think if we would also bet the RB  and  OE  defferences all at the same time we can have a safer method because its quite dificult to have completely umbalance on all the 4 bets.
Ofcource zero will be a bigger enemy then

[jrhelp007]

You probably forgot about sleepers where a dozen can stay with a hit for a large amount of time/spins and money!

John

[Psolaras]

Ok then  jrhelp007 name a better way and \i will start testing like hell 

[schoenpoetser]

In my strategy it is very important the sequence.D3-d1-d3-d3-d4-d4-d4-d4-demands another bet then
d4-d3-d3-d4-d4-d4-d3-d1. The first sequence I should bet  one unit on d1 and d2.The second sequence I should
bet d1 with the betting scheme 1-1-2-2-4.For my decisions I prefer a row of at least 15 spins.

[ReDsQuaD]

I was testing this morning something that went preety good!
 I always wanted to make a system with a Br that would n be more than 50 chips.So If I would lose 1 session then it would be easier to cover it with the next session plays.

Anyway I will post the system-method and we can have descussion after we will see how it goes with testing and if it can be tweeked then fine.

We watch the Dozens and Colums.
We see how they are developing.
we are betting on the less hited Dozen and/or Column.
we are not betting flat(I will explain how we are betting with the example I am gona gine right now)

Example

Dozens
Doz 1=4 Hits
Doz 2=1 Hit
Doz 3=3 Hits

Thank you.

You accuse me of being full of shit, haha. What a load of newbie shit this is.

If a system is based upon probably, then you are basically gambling. It is no system. Roulette cannot be beaten with mathematics or probability.

James.

[seykid29]

You accuse me of being full of shit, haha. What a load of newbie shit this is.

If a system is based upon probably, then you are basically gambling. It is no system. Roulette cannot be beaten with mathematics or probability.

James.

But Airball roulette can..that is what i have notice..need4-5 hours of play to exploit the mathematics side.Due to numbers averaging out to be act random.Well this is what i notice.I may be wrong..still
Seykid.

[ReDsQuaD]

But Airball roulette can..that is what I have notice..need4-5 hours of play to exploit the mathematics side.Due to numbers averaging out to be act random.Well this is what I notice.I may be wrong..still
Seykid.

Hey mate.

It really makes no difference. But hey if your winning, i will not argue with you .

James.

[Zindrod]

But Airball roulette can..that is what I have notice..need4-5 hours of play to exploit the mathematics side.Due to numbers averaging out to be act random.Well this is what I notice.I may be wrong..still
Seykid.

And for how long have you noticed this? 

[Psolaras]

Red quad yes sure you are full of shit.
U are speaking about an RC program that u don t know and you are making corrections in me ...when I AM the person that made the idea of this RC.....LOL

And ur attitude is also that u like to descrice any MATH system....yes i know math can win....OK we know that....

SO YOU NAME THE WINNING WAY AND I SHALL TEST IT....
if u don t want to speak about ur (imaginery) winning way ...then don t critisise the other Topics , simply because you have nothing to give.

[Bombpyrotechnic]

But Airball roulette can. . that is what I have notice. . need4-5 hours of play to exploit the mathematics side. Due to numbers averaging out to be act random. Well this is what I notice. I may be wrong. . still
Seykid.

lol airbal is quiet danger SSOOMETIMES but i can say that they are easy play if you  know where the  horse  racing  begining-))) they  give  everything  to much mean if came bad streak  it is and will be atleast  one more time but if is  came good streak there where it is possibility  about  these  crazy  maschines that  good streak  will be repeated very  sun atleast my experience with  them they  repeating  so much  numbers  that  horribly that i  love it. Airbals are funny i do attend play bad streaks with very low stakes ,sometimes it throw realy  funny  numbers my last was  this 36 25 36 25 21 22 21 22 9 22 9 25 1 25 lol and 36 i keep files with  numbers in fact that some of this machines are realy weird!

[Mr J]

Ok then  jrhelp007 name a better way and \I will start testing like hell 

Yep, thats always my line but you'll get...


A) I dont play roulette, I only visit the boards

B) My system is so good, its really hard to test

C) I am an AP guy....a God !!

D) Its top secret


Ken

[ReDsQuaD]

Red quad yes sure you are full of shit.
U are speaking about an RC program that u don t know and you are making corrections in me ...when I AM the person that made the idea of this RC.....LOL

And ur attitude is also that u like to descrice any MATH system....yes I know math can win....OK we know that....

SO YOU NAME THE WINNING WAY AND I SHALL TEST IT....
if u don t want to speak about ur (imaginery) winning way ...then don t critisise the other Topics , simply because you have nothing to give.

It is my opinion. I am not here to critise you.

James.

[ReDsQuaD]

-