Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Liberty Dog's System X

Started by libertydog, April 30, 2011, 10:38:50 AM

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

libertydog

F knows where this idea came from?? but I thank whatever popped it in my head  :D

What I really like about this is it's VERY easy to play,and not long to track before a betting opportunity!

It's based on the dozens and/or columns, and betting will be on 2 of the dozens/columns using a slight progression 1-1 2-2 3-3 4-4....ect  up on a loss,down on a win, instead of the aggressive 1,3,9,27..ect

I called it System X because what the aim is, is to bet against a X forming..... here let me explain:

Tracking the first 2 dozens out, say it was 1 and 2, this is the top of the X:

12

Now were betting the rest of the X will not complete itself, and a X complete on 1 and 2  would look like this:

12
21

But.....

12
23

Is incomplete,follow?

here are a few more complete X's so you get what I mean

11
11

31
13

23
32... think you get it now.


As for the zero, this will be counted a pain in the butt Joker on the bottom of the X:

12
0

12
20

But if a zero forms on the top of the X then stop n form a new top.


In action, System X looks like this:

12
3  --2 never formed so win +1

31
3 w+2

12
3 w+3

33
33  (1-1 2-2) LL-3

23      
1   (3-3) w-0

23
2   (2-2) w+2

32
1 w+3

13
1 w+4

23
1 w+5

32
1 w+6

As you can see,it does ok for a system...now I must go and test it to death  ;D enjoy!

LD

libertydog

Test using the real wheel again:

33
1 w+1

31
11 lw+1

21
2 w+2

11
2 w+3

21
3 w+4

12
23 lw +4

32
3 w +5

13
1 w+6

23
1 w+7

32
3 w+8

33
1 w+9

LD






libertydog

More...


33
31 lw 0

31
3 w+1

21
3 w+2

22
3 w+3

33
2 w+4

12
3 w+5

13
1 w+6

12
23 lw +6

11
2 w+7

33
03 ll +1..sod it ran out of numbers  :-[





Kagatori

Interesting idea, I especially like the progression.  Will have a play with this.

schoenpoetser

I can not understand what you are betting and how much.
For example:the last two spins are dozen 1 and dozen 3 .What do you bet? I think you do not expect dozen 3 ,so you bet one unit on dozen 1 and 2. The outcome is dozen 3.What is your next move?
Blaise Pascal say every two spins have 9 different possible rows.There are three rows starting with dozen 3. The chance for a hit is 33,3%

Kagatori

How is there 9 possible rows?

libertydog

Quote from: schoenpoetser on April 30, 2011, 01:32:19 PM
I can not understand what you are betting and how much.
For example:the last two spins are dozen 1 and dozen 3 .What do you bet? I think you do not expect dozen 3 ,so you bet one unit on dozen 1 and 2. The outcome is dozen 3.What is your next move?
Blaise Pascal say every two spins have 9 different possible rows.There are three rows starting with dozen 3. The chance for a hit is 33,3%

not a clue what your on about???

Kingspin

I think what schoenpoetser is trying to say is that this method gives you no advantage  ;D

I am not pulling the system down but you need to play these methods with cool hard cash for a few days , maybe a week or so  and report back , for me the success is in the hard cash won that proves this is a reasonable bet at least.


ADulay

Quote from: libertydog on April 30, 2011, 10:38:50 AM
Tracking the first 2 dozens out, say it was 1 and 2, this is the top of the X:


here are a few more complete X's so you get what I mean

11
11

31
13

23
32... think you get it now.


Actually, I get it.  Very clever and simple.  Probably not a long term winner, but neither is anything else when betting the dozens.   However, it is just clever enough to play with for awhile.

Thanks.

AD

bombus

Quote from: libertydog on April 30, 2011, 10:38:50 AM
F knows where this idea came from?? but I thank whatever popped it in my head...  :D

... this is the top of the X:...

@ libertydog,

I like it!

I wouldn't mind popping a few of them ones myself.

Top of the X?... You can go straight to the top of the class.

Mate, I reckon you could go close to winning the Great Cheesy Challenge with this one. All you need is the X factor money management schedule (not too difficult), and maybe tweak it to bet every spin (easy done).

Cheers, and thanx for posting.

schoenpoetser

Quote from: Kagatori on April 30, 2011, 02:11:55 PM
How is there 9 possible rows?
Spin 1  : 3 possibilities   1    2     3
spin 2  : 3^2 = 9 rows   11-12-13-22-23-21-33-32-31
Spin 3  : 3^3=27 rows. try to make all possible rows of three outcomes

I made a mistake.If you bet two dozens the chance of a hit is 66,6%.The next bet on two dozens is allways 66.6%
The chance for a lost bet on the row100/9 =11.11%

No account the zero.

Kingspin

I don't think it's possible to win some thing like +40 units (or more) profit with this , has any one actually won any thing with this method.

Kagatori

I've tried this system with 4 hours play with Super Casino real wheel. I used 4 previous days worth of spins and last nights. Of those had I  been playing for real money,  I would have been well in profit on 4 and a small loss on one. Had I been putting £20 per dozen I would have been £500+ up. I have the d!state at home to verify this. I don't know why this way of playing is so effective but it is. Not suggesting its the H.G. and when. I test it somemore it could go downhill but very positive so far.

I also forgot to mention I used flat bets. You only need to get two right to one  miss  to break even and 3 to one ratio to make a profit.

libertydog

A system popped in my head, I posted it where it's meant to go. Never said it was a long term winner or a HG. hopefully it's a seed for something better to grow

Kagatori

Looks good so far!   As stated above I did very well with flat bets Also I didn't wait for an "X" to form, I bet continuously, only stopping for the odd 0.  So for example

12
1   I still placed chips on the other half of the X not forming.  The other good thong about this system is with a 3 spin gap you have a good chance of missing the 0.  Good idea LD. Will give it some more tests.

Kagatori

-