The safest roulette system in the world?

[ChickenDinner]

Proven roulette strategy at nolinks.roulettephysics.com and electronic devices that predict where the ball will land at nolinks.roulette-computers.com

Hi people,

I stumbled across this simple system on a Spanish website - it might be old news for some, but for those who don't know it - it's worth a look:-

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This is the title of this system just send-ruleta.com systems, with this name is sold on the Internet, actually "a lot".
Gain average $ 60 per hour using tokens of $ 1.
The sessions are rare loss. (Approximately two per thousand turns).

This is a system <<original>> - not a <<new>> version of an old system.

It has never been published before.


Two bets are made at every turn:
Minors (1-18) and the third dozen (25-36)
Bet one - One to Eighteen
The bet from 1 to 18 out of the roulette table to cover the numbers 1 through 18.

This bet paid equal money to bet, and means that a $ 1 bet pays $ 1 if any of the numbers from 1 to 18 wins.
Bet two - Three dozen
The three dozen to bet on the outskirts of the roulette table covers numbers 25 to 36.

This bet pays 2 to 1, meaning that a $ 1 bet pays $ 2 if any of the numbers from 25 to 36 leaves.

By placing the two bets at once: 1 to 18 and three dozen  ut can cover 30 numbers on the roulette by placing two bets on each spin: 1 to 48 and the third dozen.
Only 8 numbers can make you miss:
0, 00, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 y 24. 0, 00, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24.
You must place bets in both quantity of 3 chips in 1 to 18 and 2 dozen chips in the third.

Why?

If you get a number from 1 to 18, you earn 3 chips in 1 to 18 and lost two tiles in 25 to 36, for a gain of 1 sheet.
If you get a number from 25 to 36, you earn 4 chips in that bet and lost 3 chips in 1 to 18 for a gain of 1 unit.
You will be happy to know that the two bets are not united and not lose very often many times in a row. That's because at each turn you have 30 chances to win against only 8 of losing opportunities. These inequalities are gain tremendously in your favor!

After thousands of tests using drawings saved casino, the largest of the times in a row that the two bets LOST was 4 times. Four times in a row incredible!

In 1000 an average of drafts, must have 210 losses only once, 40 losses twice in a row, 9 losses three times in a row, 2 losses four times in a row and 0 losses of five or more times in a row. These numbers are based on mathematical probability.

During our tests, the numbers varied for each group of 1000 drafts, but not by much.
We have never seen losses five times in a row in our tests. This does not mean that five or more losses followed are not possible. Anything is possible, but against inequalities see five or more losses followed are immense! On average, you will experience a loss, two or more times in a row, once every 40 turns. With such low probabilities of having "losses followed," you can make progressions winners to take advantage of these great inequalities.
A progression winner
If any of the eight issues listed losers, 0, 00, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 24, lost both bets for a total of 5 chips. If you bet 5 chips on each turn, you will lose money in the long run.. However, if the two are increasing bets after a loss, you'll earn more money than you lose.
Here is the progression winner.
A loss:
Our <<basic bet is 3 / 2 (3 chips in 1 to 18 and 2 chips in the dozen 3).
Follow betting 3 / 2 until you have a loss (where 0, 00, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 or 24 show up).
After its first loss, increase their bets on 9 / 6.
If this bet wins, his next bet is also 9 / 6.
If this bet wins, you will have made 1-chip gain.
You only need to win the next 2 twists row to take profit.
For example, the first drawing is 21. You lose 5 chips.
His next bet is 9 chips in 1 to 18 and 6 chips in the third dozen.
The next turn is 4. You gain 9 chips in 1 to 18 and lost 6 chips in the third dozen to a gain of 3 chips.
When you subtracted the 5 chips that have been lost in the first turn, must still be recovering 2 chips.
. His next bet is 9 and 6 chips. The next turn is 7.
You have won by this turn 3 chips. Add this to your - 2 chips and you will be gaining 1 tab. Now you will return to the basic bet 3 / 2.
Two losses followed:
Our <<bet basic>> is 3 / 2 (3 chips in 1 to 18 and 2 chips in the third dozen).
After the first loss, their next challenge will be 9 / 6.
If this bet is lost, your next bet should be 33/22.
If this bet wins, his next bet is also 33/22.
If this bet wins, you have 1 unit gain.
. His next challenge will be 3 / 2.
Three losses followed:
Our <<bet basic>> is 3 / 2 (3 chips in 1 to 18 and 2 chips in the third dozen).
After the first loss, their next challenge will be 9 / 6.
If this bet is lost, your next bet should be 33/22.
If this bet loses, the next should be 74/36.
. If this bet wins, his next bet should be 74/36.
If this bet wins, his next bet should be 74/36. His next bet should be 3 / 2.
If any of the latest betting loses, assumes its loss of $ 185 and then play.. Do not risk more than $ 100 in a single turn.
The money needed is $ 185.
On average at 1.000 turns you must win $ 630. As was said before, you should have only 2 losses four times in a row.
. The former is the progression that we use when we apply this system. You can experiment with their own progression if desired.
Converting the four losses in a row winning.
We found a secret that eliminates many of the losses four times in a row! Whenever one of eight numbers appears losers, switch to the two opposing bets on the next bet: (at the next bet after a loss, put 9 chips in 19-36 and 6 chips in the first dozen). Then return to your normal bet.
Consider this sequence:
19
21
19
23
19
21  (bet on 19 to 36 and in the first dozen and we won!)
19  (back to 1 to 18 and three dozen lose)
23  (bet on 19 to 36 and in the first dozen and we won!)

This is really the roulette system better and safer the world. Good luck. And do not forget to try the system before playing for real money.



Thanks Alex Gomez (Colombia) for the translation.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


So, what do people think about this? I haven't had the time to look at in close details, but at first glance it seems a bit too Martingalish for my style of play -I think those 4 loses will come more often than the system suggests - but interesting nonetheless.


CD

[Natural9]

Maybe the math gurus could pull this apart and yes I feel the 4 in row losses would happen more than the authors says as well and there is always the dreaded zero that can rear its ugly head as well

Regards Rodney

[hermes]

I played the "chicken" system a lot before. If second dozen shows up often you get a lot of sweating. The alternating of the sides helps a little but best solution would be to to start like that and after while look for the weakest dozen performance and exploit that. Than you use L or H + 2 lines.  3u. L/H + 1u. L + 1u. L. Than with that suggested progression you have a chance to win more often than lose.
For sure European or even better French roulette (ECs prison) should be the only solution.
Cheers Hermes

[lucky_strike]

ChickenDinner I like it and I have a bet selection for 30 numbers, I will run it and test the progression to see how it peforms.

I will post the link here later and post it at the test section.

Just want to say that I have the same opinion as hermes regarding la partage rule, that would save us hudge amount of money.

Here is a short one just to explore it a littel just to see how the staking plan would peform...

True Random Numbers 260 events

WWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWW

344     W 3/2
432     W 3/2
432     W 3/2
435     W 3/2
345     W 3/2
433     W 3/2
4345    LW 3/2 9/6
436     W 9/6
435     W 3/2
436     W 3/2
436     W 3/2
345     W 3/2
3432    LW 3/2 9/6
342     W 9/6
342     W 3/2
346     W 3/2
436     W 3/2
342     W 3/2
342     W 3/2
432     W 3/2

True Random Numbers 260 events

WWWLWWLLWWWLWWWWWLWWWWWW

345     W 3/2
345     W 3/2
431     W 3/2
3436    LW 3/2 9/6
432     W 9/6
43432  LLW 3/2 9/6 33/22
435     W 33/22
346     W 3/2
3431    LW 3/2 9/6
346     W ´9/6
435     W 3/2
345     W 3/2
435     W 3/2
3433    LW 3/2 9/6
431     W 9/6
433     W 3/2
341     W 3/2
344     W 3/2
341     W 3/2


Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

I think we maybe could use this if we explore LW Registry patterns, maybe we should try to grind out a profit, the issue here is how we are going to use a bet selection with it.
Above is just a simpel way to prevent one dozen to alternate...

Cheers LS

[StarStar]

Can i know the success rate if i play in RNG? (betfair)

[lucky_strike]

starstar I don´t think you should use this if there is no la partage rule.

Well this could be a tweak to this.
If we use a timeline and bet aginst shops of series to alternate, 3 or above then we would get this distribution for 520 random events.

LW Registry:

WWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWWLWWLWWWLWWWWWLWWWWWW

This way we would avoid and reduce strikes of loses.
First, one dozen have to hit 3 in a row alternating, to get one loss, then the series of 3 alternating have to shop 3 times in a row, before you hit a sequence from hell...

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

I will run a short test now for 300 and use dozen 123 and prevent the lines for them to alternate.
Just to see how the distribution of the LW Registry will peform.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

TRNGs 2008 08 15
300 Events

LW Registry:

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWLWWWWLWWWL

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

TRNGs 2008 08 14
300 Events

Lw Registry:

WWWWWWWLWWWLWWWWWWWLWWWWWLWLWWLLWWWWWW

Well i don´t think it would work.
The staking plan is to agressive.
And i guess you would hit 3 loses every run of 1024 events.

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

This is what CPS10 wrote as an reply for an old post I made regarding this... and i quote:

If you were to have a registry such as:

WWWWWWLWWWWWLWWWWWWWWWWLWLWWLWWWWLWWWWW

Let's assume that you had an "L" before the first spin that you list on the registry. You could use a positive progression to your advantage during long winning streaks, and minimize any profit loss from a loss. Obviously, an LL sequence would be bad, but should be infrequent based on your string here.

Let's say that you are playing the 5 line method.

I would start with Spin 1 and bet 10 units on each line. If you lose, you are out 50 units. Easy enough to recoup. Now, lets say you win. You are now up 10 units. Then scale back down to either (a) 2 units per street so that a loss just evens you out; or (b) 1 unit per street to get you to 5 units profit regardless of the spin. The first bet is really the bad one, but hopefully after an "L" in virtual betting, you will get that initial win. One way or another you are going to have to risk a good bit to make your reward worthwhile.

So in this instance, you could have the following sequence:

W <--- +10 units; scale back down to 1 unit or 2 units
W <--- +11 units/+12 units; you could either stay at 1 or go to 2 depending on how aggressive you want to be
W <--- +12 units/+14 units; 1 or 2 units again
W <--- +13 units/+16 units; now you could go to 1 or 3 units
W <--- +14 units/+19 units; again, either 1 or 3
W <--- +15 units/+22 units; now you could go to 1 or 4 units
L <--- +10 units/+2 units (even regardless of how aggressive you are, you STILL come out with a profit. It's just that first win is what you need to watch out for.

From here, as I am a little conservative, I would probably stay with the 1 unit until I was at least at 20 units in the positive. Maybe at 15, and move up to 2 for at least a 5-unit gain. Anyway, here is the rest for me (after securing a 10-unit profit and I would bet 10 units to start):

W <--- +20 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +22 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +24 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +26 units; bet 3 units
W <--- +29 units; bet 3 units
L <--- +14 units; bet 10 units
W <--- +24 units; bet 1 unit
W <--- +25 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +27 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +29 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +31 units; bet 3 units
W <--- +34 units; bet 3 units
W <--- +37 units; bet 4 units
W <--- +41 units; bet 5 units
W <--- +46 units; bet 6 units
W <--- +52 units; bet 7 units
L <--- +17 units; bet 10 units
W <--- +27 units; bet 1 unit
W <--- +28 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +30 units; bet 2 units
L <--- +20 units; bet 10 units
W <--- +30 units; bet 1 unit
W <--- +31 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +33 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +35 units; bet 2 units
L <--- +25 units; bet 10 units
W <--- +35 units; bet 1 unit
W <--- +36 units; bet 1 unit
W <--- +37 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +39 units; bet 2 units
W <--- +41 units

------End of Session------
39 spins; +41 units; highest = +52 units

At $5/unit, that isn't a bad return at all.

[hermes]

Yes, the regression is a good strategy but what about to start play positive progression (rise 1 unit after 2 wins) after L's finishes and bet until next loss? It hurts to lose 10 units at beginning. LW would be a trigger to start bets............................it F***** up......................
E.g. WLWWWWWWWWLLWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWW           
.............bet..............L    bet...................L   bet......and so on...
Hermes

[ChickenDinner]

You guys are right - exploring LW Registry patterns is the way forward here.

I was thinking something on the lines of wait for an L, or even an LL as an entry point; and also, maybe even bet the L once after an LL showing? After all, it's only 1 line so risking 4 units could recover the loss and tip it in your direction over time.

Maybe also play for 6 wins only, then pause, wait for an L, or if you want to be extra careful, an LL, and re-renter?

Being an anti-progression person myself, I would not like to be risking it past 2 losses.

I'll have a think, do some testing, and see what ideas I get.

CD

[ChickenDinner]

I saw 4 losses in a session today - luckily I was playing a different system and those 6 numbers cashed in for me[smiley=thumbsup.gif]

Anyway, after testing this system a little - I think 10 wins and then stop and wait for an LL before re-entering is a much safer (obviously boring sometimes) way to play. When do you hit an LL, i'd rather take the loss and try and recoup on the Ws. If you hit LL too often though (causing a 10-20% loss) - quit.

CD

[buffalowizard]

Great post there roddy

[buffalowizard]

-