Has anyone made randomness work for them.

[crackers]

If anything does work, it doesn't work consistent. Is there a secret to this?

[bombus]

Hi crackers.

Nothing, I repeat NOTHING works consistantly.

If the holy grail is guaranteed profit every session then it doesn't exist.

Even wheel clockers, bias spotters and VB players must accept their quota of lost sessions.

The truth is plain and simple; it's what Steve always says. You must increase the accuracy of your predictions. It's the only way to win.

Using or challenging randomness to increase your accuracy is one way to go about it. Find what works for you and practice it thoroughly. Then fine tune it as best you can over a long period. The fine tuning is learning or knowing when your method is working well, and when it's not. You also need to decide when enough is enough. Won enough, lost enough, had enough.

[Bayes]

If anything does work, it doesn't work consistent. Is there a secret to this?

Get together with cheese, you'll make a great team!

[Carpanta]

Curiosly Crackers made the point:

Has anyone made randomness work for them?

Answer:

Me (and at least two others i know)

[bombus]

Get together with cheese, you'll make a great team!

Strictly speaking, cheese should get together with crackers. 

[bombus]

Curiosly Crackers made the point:

Has anyone made randomness work for them?

Answer:

Me (and at least two others I know)

Curiously I have the same story.

Answer:

Me (and at least two others I know)...myself, and I. 

[Carpanta]

Curiously I have the same story.

Answer:

Me (and at least two others I know)...myself, and I. 

Lol Good to know im not alone. It seems we share same insanity.

[crackers]

Is there an inside joke going on here? Are some of you saying it does not work, that is randomness does not work?

[superman]

Is there an inside joke going on here?

Slightly, there's a member called cheese who speaks against everything, so they are playing on the cheese and crackers snacks lol.

that is randomness does not work?

Randomness definatly works.

[crackers]

Superman

cheese and crackers snacks lol [/quot]
Oh, I get it. Let's have some cheese and crackers with that whine.

[crackers]

My conclusion after reading and practice is that there is a basic value to this. "Reading Randomnes"  is nothing  more than a  syntactic form of a kind of mnemonic device that allows you the ability to discover "winning  streaks." Apparently many think that it's about "prediction" but that would be impossible. It's  about taking advantage of a temporary condition, a win streak. There's also discussion about three spins back or less. That would be interesting to read more about. Can't find much about that.  Are there  any good books or Authors that write about this?

[cheese]

It's  about taking advantage of a temporary condition, a win streak.

Its about making win streaks last as
long as possible. Its about making
your goal and getting out. Looking
like you're lucky is never a bad thing.

There are no books or authors that
write about this. You're on your own.
Scary, huh.

[pins]

google. roulette streaks.

[cheese]

"Reading Randomnes"  is nothing  more than a  syntactic form of a kind of mnemonic device

Syntactic means 'words strung together'. Mnemonic device
is a learning technique that aids memory. So reading random
are just words that refer to a technique for memorizing.
Memorizing what, exactly.

[crackers]

Cheese and Crackers, what an auspicious moment.

syntactic: " Of, relating to, or conforming to the rules of syntax." - look it up.

" kind of mnemonic device" does not mean mnemonic device.

Seeing a characteristic in a chart of spins is a form of recollections. The chart is the memory device.

[crackers]

-