Cut point methodology.

[lucky_strike]

Code Select Expand


  2
  2
1
1
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2      14 singels and 2 series - statistical ecart 3,00
1
1
  2
  2
  2
1
1      WON      +1
  2
  2      
  2
1
1      
1
1
  2
  2      
  2
1
  2      
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2

Code Select Expand


1
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2      19 singels and 4 series - statistical ecart 3,12
  2
1
1
  2
1      LOSS       -1
  2
1
1
1
1
1
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1
  2
  2      WON        0
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1      WON      +1
1
  2
1      
1
1
1
1

Code Select Expand


1
1
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1      16 singels and 3 series - statistical ecart 2,98
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
1
1
  2
1      LOSS      -1
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1
  2
  2      WON       0
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1      WON      +1
1
1
  2
1
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1
1
1
1
1

Code Select Expand


1
1
1
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2      17 singels and 3 series - statistical ecart 3,13
1
1
  2
  2
  2
1
  2      LOSS      -1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
1
1
  2
  2      WON       0
1
1      WON      +1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
1
1
  2
  2

Code Select Expand


  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2      20 singels and 4 series - statistical ecart 3,26
1
1
  2
  2
1
  2      LOSS      -1
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
1
  2
1      LOSS      -2
1
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
  2
1
1
1
  2
  2      WON      -1
  2
1
1      WON       0
1
  2
  2      WON      +1
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2

Code Select Expand


1
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
  2
  2
  2
1
  2
1
1
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2      16 singels and 2 series - statistical ecart 3,29
1
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
1
1
1
  2
  2      Won      +1
  2
1
1      
1
  2
1
1
1

Code Select Expand

  2
  2
  2
1
1
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2      19 singels and 2 series - statistical ecart 3,70
1
1
  2
  2
1
1      WON      +1
1
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
  2
1
  2      
  2
  2
1
1
1
  2
  2      

Code Select Expand

1
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
  2
1
  2
1
1
  2
1
  2
1
  2
1      17 singels and 3 sereis - statistical ecart 3,13
  2
  2
  2
1
1
1
1
  2
1      LOSS      -1
  2
1
1
  2
  2
1      LOSS      -2
  2
  2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
  2
1      LOSS      -3
1
  2
  2
  2
1
1

[lucky_strike]

Made a short test TRNG 070101 070102

12 QS 34 PLACED BETS GAIN 11 UNITS LOSS 3 UNITS

Cheers LS

[J.Daniels]

I find it  very interesting but I dont get it all after couple of readings. Ok then for you,  "series" are repeting colors (BBB, RRR) and series of zig zag (BRBR) ? and singles is something like this ---> BBB [R] BB ?

Thanks! JD.

[lucky_strike]

Hi J Daniels... have to say i like your avatar

Here is one interesting thing, just for fun.

How can you find a serie of 2 singels without it becomes to be a  separated singel by it self or how can you find a serie of 2 singels without it becomes a separated serie of 3 singels.

RRRBRRR - RRRBR - B

RRRBRBBB - RRRBRB - BRB

Cheers LS

[lucky_strike]

Hi J Daniels.

If you want to try CPM i would try series contra singels and now i am going to ramble a little...

The choice from where to start the calculation of a tendency - positive, periodic, negative - refers to find a isolated window of outcomes and from where only future outcomes counts, not the past, except the window, the Qualified signal from where you start your reel play.

When we use the negative tendency - imbalance between two figures - a window have to qualify whit minimum 16 outcomes and a maximum of 50, less is better. Then we can take a advantage of the Law of Correction and  play after indications from imbalance to recoup for balance, instead of chasing sleepers.

And if we find a situation, a world there it doesn't exist series of 2 then the becomes a huge difference between 1 and 3.

Cheers LS

[J.Daniels]

Hi J Daniels... have to say i like your avatar

thanks, You inspired me   [smiley=grin.gif]

How can you find a serie of 2 singels without it becomes to be a  separated singel by it self or how can you find a serie of 2 singels without it becomes a separated serie of 3 singels

forgive my slow brain, but still dont get it. Ok as u understood a separated single is this BBB(R)BBB, and series of singles are zig-zag, BRB <-- this is a serie of 3 singles. am I correct?

Thanks

JD

[J.Daniels]

Hi J Daniels.

If you want to try CPM i would try series contra singels and now i am going to ramble a little...

Ok then, I will do series (at least a repetition of 1 color --> BB;RR;BBB;RRR;BBBB;RRRR), against singles (one color alone in the middle of 2 series---> BBB(R)BBB; RR(B)RR)

If there is something wrong please correct me

Thanks

JD

[J.Daniels]

-