The Grail of Randomness

[cheese]

Sure, I'm ending Roulette after more than 200 years of effort from others.

Not by playing the dozens. There's only one way
to beat roulette and its the EC's. Interestingly,
in the book Monte Carlo Anecdotes, written over
100 years ago, the author details about 10 popular
systems that date back into the 1800's. Every
single one of them involves the EC's. None for
the dozens, none for the inside numbers. It all
comes down to the EC's. Weird, huh. Too bad you
weren't around then, Gizmo, you could have set
him straight. LOL!

[WARRIOR]

Not by playing the dozens. There's only one way
to beat roulette and its the EC's. Interestingly,
in the book Monte Carlo Anecdotes, written over
100 years ago, the author details about 10 popular
systems that date back into the 1800's. Every
single one of them involves the EC's. None for
the dozens, none for the inside numbers. It all
comes down to the EC's. Weird, huh. Too bad you
weren't around then, Gizmo, you could have set
him straight. LOL!
[/quote  Dosent mean he beat the game.

[Carpanta]

Thanks Sam. Are you sure you want to recommend the Martingale?

I'm attempting to communicate concepts and illustrate characteristics. All the
examples are exaggerated in order to make seeing them easier. I dare you to
prove that when red changes to black or when black changes to red that the
reds will never repeat at least two more times before changing  to black. The
same goes for the black. I'll bet someone can find a sequence at the Wiesbaton
archives that is more complex than my example here and that will be from a
sequence of real spins.

Just a snack from Dublinbet yesterday.

High Limits table. Dealer Val. Game numbers: 1.951.874 to 1.951.909

Spins:

     16
      5
      7
8
     14
8
      7
17
    0
      1
     16
     34
15
6
8
     36
2
31
     30
     32
33
35     
31
28
     14
     34
     32
      1
     36
20
31
     32
13
29
10
22

Oldest number 16

What do I see here? Along with the variants i work with:

16 5 7 8 14 8 7 17 0 1 16 34 15 6 8 36 2 31

All are low numbers except for one 0 and 34. So dominance is low numbers till 31 when rythm is broken.

A "dirty little secret" by the way, number 0 is low and odd. How is it? Look at the numbers disposition on the wheel:

  3     26        0    32     15
odd even      0   even  odd
                  odd

due to numbers characteristics distribution along a single 0 wheel you won't see something like this:

even even even or odd odd odd ( three consecutive numbers bearing the same characteristic)

So in my example 0 wont change my mind about keeping on betting low numbers. After 34 (lose bet) shows you see another low number. You go on betting low numbers till 36 (another loss) but you keep betting low, then it comes 2 (win) 31 (loss) and stop betting. The former pattern is finished.

For me playing inside bets something extraordinarily happened here.
Numbers 5 7 8 14 8 7 belongs to the same family or wheel layout: 4 5 6 7 8 14 22 25 32 33 35 36
As dominance was on low numbers the showing pattern let me bet on 4 5 6 7 8 14 when i got the second repetition ( thierd appeareance) of same group. A God's gift just playing six numbers winning three consecutive spins.

The session continues as reported above like this:

(31) 30 32 33 33 35 31 28 14 34 32 1 36 20 31 32 13 29 10 22

After 30 you bet high will go since the wheel is throwing larger series than 2. 33 confirms my suspicions. 14 is a loss but i keep betting high expecting this low number comes isolated. In previous pattern while low was being favoured it occured high numbers were isolated (34 and 36).
Further on number 1 is a loss. But i keep on high numbers. Number 13 a loss again but i continue betting high. 29 is a win. 10 is a loss and i stop betting. 22 shows me there can be a string of singles coming ahead or not?!.

There are more things to account for from this permanence than these ones exposed but i wanted to remark those related to high/low scheme.

That's all folks.

Cheers,
Carlos.

[Nickmsi]

Great examples Carlos . . . Dominance and Singles in the High/Low number set.

I also noticed that this series of numbers had a Dominance of Evens? 

Thanks

Nick

[crackers]

Great example Carlos.

Here are a few more tidbits. Often in a session I'll have a steady rise, one that
includes a few losses, where there will be a small setback. It becomes obvious
to me that its like reaching a wall that is difficult to get past. The temptation is
to try to force your way past it. I'll try to use larger bets to get things moving
again. This is often a mistake. You can't force randomness to act the way you
would wish it would. You must go with what it gives you and at the speed that
it deals it out. Chasing your losses is a well known mistake. So when you hit
these little walls use them as signals to stay cool and minimise your risk.

Following randomness is not easy. It's hard to be agile. Experience is gained
from practice. That's the main reason I use computers to practice. It's worth
it to practice as real world as you can. I use a real felt layout and real weighted
chips. I fill out real hand written charts. I use real live spins from online sources.
I do this so that my rhythm is real. It teaches you to analyze in time to make bets.

[crackers]

It all comes down to the EC's. Weird, huh. Too bad you
weren't around then, Gizmo, you could have set
him straight. LOL!

That's OK chump. I'm here to set you straight. The real world is more than just your
EC only world. The fact is that I explained balance in this thread and it obviously has
gone right over your head. By the way. Why don't you prove it? You are fast becoming
irrelevant. Can't you see the world wizzing by?

BTW, I was asked to tell a joke. I thought ending roulette was self depricating humor.

[crackers]

I was accused of using a progression yesterday. This was my response to that:
" ..., you know nothing about a graduated level of risk based on the likelihood that the next best trend to follow is related to it also."

I don't flat bet. I use minimum bets when I think caution is prudent.  I up the bets when
more likely trends tend to dominate. If that looks like a progression to some people then
what can I do about it. When you get good at this you will enjoy  using mini attacks on the
current conditions.

[cheese]

If that looks like a progression to some people

Of course its a progression. When you progress
your bets, thats a progression.

Mr Roulette Expert.

[iggiv]

well, his progression was very light i should say. 5, 10, 20 -- these were his only bets.

[crackers]

Of course its a progression. When you progress
your bets, thats a progression.

Everyone knows that progressions proceed by their rules until a win occurs or until it
limits out. There are no rules. Spike just wants to talk off topic. If he wants to debate
that educated guessing combined with multiple sized bets is a progression then have
him start a new thread. He could bring it up at the thread I created for him.

[cheese]

Everyone knows that progressions proceed by their rules

Progressions can have rules or no rules. It can be  whatever
you feel is correct at the time. I see people playing bac who
make up progressions as they go all the time. A woman will
bet $100, lose, and bet $300, lose and bet $700 and win. The
next series will be entirely different. It doesn't matter, a progression
is a progression is a progression.

[crackers]

Anyone notice tbat Spike has taken the topic of all the randomness threads over to
progressions?

Anyone with half a brain knows that multi-level betting is hiding right around the corner
like a two ton gorilla in the room.

[crackers]

THAT DOES IT. I'm done forever. I'm leaving all the forums forever. Spike is your best hope now.

[cheese]

THAT DOES IT. I'm done forever. I'm leaving all the forums forever.

Anybody notice a pattern? Last year Gizmo threatens
to shut down roulette. Does demo, fails miserably,
disappears 'forever'.

Comes back this year and does the exact same thing.

What about all that money he claims he won in the
casinos. Did he make that up? Say its not so..

[mcmonaco]

Anybody notice a pattern? Last year Gizmo threatens
to shut down roulette. Does demo, fails miserably,
disappears 'forever'.

Comes back this year and does the exact same thing.

What about all that money he claims he won in the
casinos. Did he make that up? Say its not so..

--If anything he is getting nearer to ppl.listening.
What about you Spike.Did you ever contribute with
anything,except your sarcastic remarks.You have to eat
tons of cheese before you come near Gizmo.He is doc
for you.You know why????Couse you never ever show
anything all these years but empty talk.Don' go Gizmo,
let the parrot sweat.

[mcmonaco]

-