Optimising the Holy Grail

[Bayes]

And one of those call self gurus took his part in this thread,but you
should know that this gent never seen inside Casino,may
be outside......LOL..... how do I know this??
Next time maybe.

FLAT, I'm pretty sure you're referring to me, so in the first place, I'm not a "self-guru" to use your phrase (which is obviously meant in a derogatory sense). Secondly, you can't and don't know whether I've been in a casino or not. So I'd like to know how you "know" this? However you know it, you're wrong, because I have.

I'd be the first to admit I'm not a regular casino goer because I prefer to play online. But the point is quite irrelevant anyway; you might have been to 1000 casinos and visit them every day, but still be a big fat loser (as most players are).

Your remarks are just pointless trolling.

[superman]

I'm pretty sure you're referring to me

LOL, or me, who cares.

you might have been to 1000 casinos and visit them every day, but still be a big fat loser

Well judging by all his methods and the amount of times they change/morph, he probably is just like most players, each to there own. Funny how one person jumps on anyone that plays RNG and keeps jumping at every opportunity, give it a rest unc

[mcmonaco]

*edited by bombus the roulette world's fairest moderator*

Ok mcmonaco, that's enough of your trolling, and unwarranted accusations. You've been warned.

[xman1970]

*edited by moderator*

Ok mcmonaco, that's enough of your trolling. You've been warned.

"edited by moderator"

Ok that's fair enough, I've been a moderator n to be honest not every member here is a saint......

BUT

Should we not know WHO moderated the post ?? & why ??

Or is it now like a company who's "helpline" reads :-

Donald Duck
Mickey Mouse
Etc Etc Etc.......

I don't think anybody here is the head of one of those $%^*£% banks.......

Would make a nice change IF the buck DID stop with someone......

For a $%£"^&$ change.......

[bombus]

"edited by moderator"

Ok that's fair enough, I've been a moderator n to be honest not every member here is a saint......

BUT

Should we not know WHO moderated the post ?? & why ??

Or is it now like a company who's "helpline" reads :-

Donald Duck
Mickey Mouse
Etc Etc Etc.......

I don't think anybody here is the head of one of those $%^*£% banks.......

Would make a nice change IF the buck DID stop with someone......

For a $%£"^&$ change.......

I don't see how it makes any difference but it's all fixed now.

[crackers]

*edited by bombus the roulette world's fairest moderator*

Yes, that's much better. ...and it optimizes this thread too.

[xman1970]

I don't see how it makes any difference but it's all fixed now.

Thxs Bombus 

I like accountability.......

[schoenpoetser]

I have been away for a long time.I see there are still members who believe tot beat the EV.
My SSB-system looks like a HG. You bet on a sere of 20 EC . In the past I have placed the excelprogram here on the forum.

I have also described a HG based on a strategy. This HG beat the roulette,but is not very suitable to play

[schoenpoetser]

Try a M-sample. Compute every last 50 spins the difference between the numbers Red and Black.If the difference is + or - 15 flatbet  one fiche opposite till you win one fiche and wait for the next opportunity. Stop the session after a hit. I guarantee you will never lost a session.

[superman]

Whats a fiche?

[insidebet]

Shoe,

Just for fun, I have tested a little over 5 000 spins of your latest strategy (+ or- 15).

I played all even chances.  The result?  Even!  336 placed bets.  This is not a lot in that many spins.  You would have to play this in B and M casino, where you could track many tables at once. Maybe +15 is a little bit on the hard side...

Also, I kept playing after a win if the score was still at +15 or more.  It really makes no sense to stop.  I"ll explain why.

Say you just hit and are +1.  According to you, you stop playing and start tracking again, right? ok.  Now someone who plays the same system as you walks in.  He gets a hold of the last 50 spins.  HE starts betting, right?  The conditions are met, right?  So how come this a good bet for him and not for you?

If only somebody could RX this. With the option of putting the trigger at 15 or number that you wish.  I really would like to see this.  Anybody with any kind of RX skills would this in a few minutes.  (Not me! I can t program my watch...)

Insider

[insidebet]

By the way, "fiche" is French for "chip"

[bombus]

By the way, "fiche" is French for "chip"

fiche & chips..... lovely! 

[Robeenhuut]

Shoe,

Just for fun, I have tested a little over 5 000 spins of your latest strategy (+ or- 15).

I played all even chances.  The result?  Even!  336 placed bets.  This is not a lot in that many spins.  You would have to play this in B and M casino, where you could track many tables at once. Maybe +15 is a little bit on the hard side...

Also, I kept playing after a win if the score was still at +15 or more.  It really makes no sense to stop.  I"ll explain why.

Say you just hit and are +1.  According to you, you stop playing and start tracking again, right? ok.  Now someone who plays the same system as you walks in.  He gets a hold of the last 50 spins.  HE starts betting, right?  The conditions are met, right?  So how come this a good bet for him and not for you?

If only somebody could RX this. With the option of putting the trigger at 15 or number that you wish.  I really would like to see this.  Anybody with any kind of RX skills would this in a few minutes.  (Not me! I can t program my watch...)

Insider

This is based on Marigny de Grilleau theories but does not work. I like the theories but they are of no practical use
in roulette.

[schoenpoetser]

Insider

My strategy for the HG is only an example. In every strategy you need a trigger for to start and to stop. Every player can use his own triggers.My startingtrigger was + or -15 and the stop trigger was a profit of one fiche or jeton or chip.

This HG has no practical value.

[schoenpoetser]

-