The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[Panopticon]

Hey winkel,

I  (think ) I understand the bet selection and made a few test sessions. I was not very impressed from the results to be honest 
There was a balance between winning and losing sessions. But still it was very little testing just to understand and practice this...

I am hopping you can provide some more hints and also any suggestions based from your experience on stop loss, profit target in a session etc

Generally any statistics you can share on this would be much appreciated!

Best Regards!

[JHM]

*edit

[winkel]

Winkel,

Is it you who designed losing systems W3,W9 and sold them? I ask because I saw your name attached to sold systems that of course do not work.

I never ever sold anything. i don#t know these systems. Perhaps the name of Benno winkel is used.
please give a web-address where i can read about.

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

winkel

Here's a worksheet:



I will continue on.  There are 185 numbers.

Sorry I got frustrated.

Sam

[winkel]

Hey winkel,

...... I was not very impressed from the results to be honest 
There was a balance between winning and losing sessions.

....

I am hopping you can provide some more hints and also any suggestions based from your experience on stop loss, profit target in a session etc

of course you loose sometimes. but on long term you will win. Not a billion but win.

as I said before. If the basics are understood, there can be explained some other hints.
e.g. window to bet
when to bet not even if there is a trigger etc.

br
winkel

PS: spread-sheet in answer 47

[Panopticon]

Thanks winkel 

Of course it is expected to loose, the thing is to manage to win just a bit more 

I am looking forward for your hints, because up to now I understand you just give a rough idea of the method in order to help people understand your bet selection.

Best Regards!

[Boo_Ray]

winkel question for you

example
[table=,]
0x,1x,>1
16,14,7
15,15,7,<bet
14,16,7,<win
14,15,8,< do we bet again?
13,16,8,<we would win here but on some cases we wouldnt
[/table]

[winkel]

this is my spread-sheet on your numbers. You made a mistake!

C   No    R     N    F
1     8   36    1   0
2   12   35    2   0
3   13   34    3   0
4   18   33    4   0
5   22   32    5   0
6   27   31    6   0
7     2   30    7   0
8   12   30    6   1
9     3   29    7   1
10     1   28    8   1
11   17   27    9   1
12   31   26   10   1
13   30   25   11   1
14     7   24   12   1
15     6   23   13   1
16   11   22   14   1
17   29   21   15   1
18   20   20   16   1
19   36   19   17   1
20   20   19   16   2
21   13   19   15   3
22   19   18   16   3
23   35   17   17   3
24   32   16   18   3
25     3   16   17   4
26   23   15   18   4
27   35   15   17   5
28   15   14   18   5

but it still won on spin 24

[winkel]

winkel question for you

example
[table=,]
0x,1x,>1
16,14,7
15,15,7,<bet
14,16,7,<win
14,15,8,< do we bet again?
13,16,8,<we would win here but on some cases we wouldnt
[/table]

no don#t bet. there is no trigger given

[Boo_Ray]

ah I see, actualy 0x has to be higher than 1x to be real trigger

i understeand now, had to look back at your pisture of lines

thanks

[JHM]

winkel

Here's a worksheet:



I will continue on.&nbsp; There are 185 numbers.

Sorry I got frustrated.

Sam

Friend Sam,

You could also bet on 19 (I know not recommended, but you would have won)

Jur

[TwoCatSam]

continued...........



winkel

I am likely to make mistakes.  Mr. Chips can attest to that.  I'll have a look-see and determine where I went wrong.

Thanks for your help.

As pan said, I,too, am looking forward to your hints/tips.

Sam

jur

yes, I could have.

[TwoCatSam]

yes i made amistkae with my nu 36  shuld be 19

tard

bye

[Boo_Ray]

test @dublinbet 41spins - 30 min: +26units

[JHM]

test @dublinbet 41spins - 30 min: +26units

Interesting. But, I guess we can only say if it works when played a min. of 1000 spins?

[JHM]

-