The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[Boo_Ray]

results about how many units you win/lose

[winkel]

Hi Boo_Ray

I tested it over 10 000 000 spins and played it since 2 years.
I wouldn´t say it is the Grail if it wasn't.

I will explain any spins that are posted to show how to play. Just give any 50-60 spins and I will show.

br
winkel

[Boo_Ray]

I know, I believe you, I just want to have idea how much win/loss per season is it good

I have another question,... Is it better to use 0x 1x 2x 3x 4x thatn just 0x 1x <1

[Neuro]

Hi Roulette787 ,
you could post the code of this system?
Thank you.

[winkel]

I know, I believe you, I just want to have idea how much win/loss per season is it good

I have another question,... Is it better to use 0x 1x 2x 3x 4x thatn just 0x 1x <1

In roulette you can't win a fortune. The "Grail" has to be defined as "Not loosing and keeping your starting-bankroll alive"
I play this for 2 years on lasseters with starting bankroll of 50 Euros. this bankroll has been saved and never ever been touched again. From the winnings I formed a second bankroll with which I play. I don't balance every game. Sometimes I serve the gambler in me and bet senseless like hell till my bankroll is down to minimum 50Euros.

Your Question:
If you prefer short games which don#t get to complicated with crossings just bet 50-60 Spins.
As you see the earliest Start is after the 19th spin. (Because you need min. 18 spins to get the first crossing of 19-18. which is not recommended to play.
So if you decide that the numbers you are playing show no good crossings just start it over using the last 19 spins.

Do you play like that you only need to watch these crossings

0 vs 1
1 vs >1
0 vs >1
1 vs 2

or in another Treminology
R vs N
N vs F(all)
R vs F(all)
N vs F2

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

Winkel

Please tell me if I'm reading this right.  I'm in blue:

0 vs 1.....where 0 is = to or one greater than 1
1 vs >1....where 1 is = to or one greater than >1
0 vs >1....where 0 is = to or one greater than >1
1 vs 2......where 1 is = to or one greater than 2

Thanks for your help.

Sam

[winkel]

@tcs

yes

[hermes]

It gets complicated. It is always like that when systems have no firm rules. The liquid rules always falls into duality where we have to decide between two things and most of the time we choose the wrong one (Murpy's Law).
I am out but if we wouldn't try we wouldn't know. System must be simple as possible. In the whole universe valid is always simple only we human beings like to make things complicated as possible.
Thanks for the cake, anyway.
Hermes

[NTM]

Hello Winkel

i have understood that you cannot win big at roulette

you have play this system during 2 years
with a bankrool of 50 euro
you have save this bank roll

approximativly

1/how mutch you win in one session?

2/what is a session for you(how many spin?)

3/you play at 1 euro 2 euros 5 euros what is your money  unit ?according to your bank rool(50 euros)?

4/what is your maximum drawdown?(50 euros??)

5/how mutch accumulated win you have playing during those 2 years 50euros??

i respect your work
and I also often folow you on germans roulette board
best from the south of France
ntm

[winkel]

It gets complicated. It is always like that when systems have no firm rules. The liquid rules always falls into duality where we have to decide between two things and most of the time we choose the wrong one (Murpy's Law).
Hermes

where did you find this?
The rules are simple as can be: bet when it is likely to cross.
it is flat bet, no horrifying progression is to learn.
and it is proofed and it is safe. Even if there is one session you cannot win (that´s roulette and you can't escape from that) you will always win that often to stay PLUS.

br
winkel

[winkel]

1/how mutch you win in one session?
[highlight]when I´m in Plus I stopp[/highlight]

2/what is a session for you(how many spin?)
[highlight]session is always stopped if I´m in Plus[/highlight]

3/you play at 1 euro 2 euros 5 euros what is your money  unit ?according to your bank rool(50 euros)?
[highlight]I´m no gambler(exception see above) and I don´t want to make a living on it nor wanna win milions. Im just studying if I´m able to beat probability. I play at lasseters with 1ct.[/highlight]

4/what is your maximum drawdown?(50 euros??)
[highlight]never had a draw down. my current bankroll incl. saved starting bankroll is now 120 Euros[/highlight]

5/how mutch accumulated win you have playing during those 2 years 50euros??
[highlight]I was gambling in an unhealthy way twice every month. So if you say every time I´m up to 150 euro (all inclusive) I force down to 100 (al inclusive) you can put a math on it. 2x50Eurosx24months= 2400 Euros with 1ct Chips[/highlight]

i respect your work
and I also often folow you on germans roulette board
[highlight]thanks, so you can proof I never sold anything[/highlight]

br
winkel

[NTM]

Winkel,

Thank you for your answer.

i can also say that Winkel has nothing to sell
everybody involved in roulette know him in Germany

he is a brillant and passionated searcher on roulette and probability

i have the system (winkel 2 ,3 ,12, 37 from roulette laboratory)that somebody here has told  that
Winkel was suposed to sell.

there is not any correlation betwen this sytem (roulette laboratory from de Keyser)
and the system that Winkel explain in this topic.

hope every thing is clear now

Ntm

[winkel]

5/how mutch accumulated win you have playing during those 2 years 50euros??
[highlight]I was gambling in an unhealthy way twice every month. So if you say every time I´m up to 150 euro (all inclusive) I force down to 100 (al inclusive) you can put a math on it. 2x50Eurosx24months= 2400 Euros with 1ct Chips[/highlight]

This part of my Answer could be misunderstood.
As I told before I have 5 most-winning-systems that I combine in betting.
Sometimes the correlations give me the exact number that comes up next. As I sum up all bets of the five systems, that leads sometimes to a bet with 5ct (or even more because I use sometime the fibonacci as a winning-progression) on some plein-number so my winnings explode. On the other hand when I decide to bet like a idiot, sometimes I have a lucky streak an win with 1$/Euro bets on plein.

This means: I´m so sure of winning, that even bold-play is no problem. If I loose down to my min-bank-roll I always know I will came back.

br
winkel

[TicTacToe]

Hi Winkel

In roulette you can't win a fortune. The "Grail" has to be defined as "Not loosing and keeping your starting-bankroll alive"
I play this for 2 years on lasseters with starting bankroll of 50 Euros. this bankroll has been saved and never ever been touched again. From the winnings I formed a second bankroll with which I play. I don't balance every game. Sometimes I serve the gambler in me and bet senseless like hell till my bankroll is down to minimum 50Euros

You started with a 50 Euro bankroll ... have saved it .... formed a second and are now playing with the second bankroll. Have you not formed other bankrolls and saved them also or is this the extent of your winnings ... 2 bankrolls in 2 years .... if so ..... WOW what a Grail.



TTT

[winkel]

You started with a 50 Euro bankroll ... have saved it .... formed a second and are now playing with the second bankroll.

That is absolutely correct

Have you not formed other bankrolls and saved them also or is this the extent of your winnings ... 2 bankrolls in 2 years .... if so ..... WOW what a Grail.

No I haven't formed another bankroll. Why should I? It's not necessary because I can fill up with winnings as often and as fast as I want.

Money has no worth to me. Just having fun being possible to do senseless gambling with loosing not my money or money I would need for living.

My days are counted and so I decided to spread this around the world hoping to be famous for this after I´m gone.


br
winkel

[winkel]

-