The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[winkel]

some more basics:

as far as we know there can be 33 numbers or just 15 numbers appearing in 37 spins.

relating to this strategy:
1. If there are 33 nmumbers we will have absolutely no crossing "0"vs"1" because after 19-18 at "0" vs "">0" the "1" will never be lower than the "0"s
as there wil be nearly no "2"s we will have no crossing "1"vs"2" or "1" ">1"

2. If there are only 15 numbers appearing we will have no crossing "0" vs any
There will be a crossing "1"vs">1" and "1"vs"2" maximum 8units to bet absolutely no risc.

So we we are safe for getting in extrem situations.

We will only bet if we are near to binomial distribution.
The "Law of the Third" doesn´t only tell, that there are app. 24 numbers hit, 12 not, and 12 more often than once in 37 spins.

If we break the 37 spins in 3 parts: 13spins/12spins/12spins
and make a statistic on it we will get this result:
spin 1-13: app. 10-11 unhit numbers appear
spin 14-25: app. 8 unhit numbers appear
spin 26-37: app. 6 unhit numbers appear
and
spin 38-50: app. 4-5 unhit numbers appear

total after 37 spins 24-25
total after 37 spins 28-30

We can be sure:
If in spin 1-13 were more/less than 10 numbers: in spin 14-25 there will be mostly 8 numbers
If in spin 14-25 were more/less than 8 numbers: in spin 26-37 there will be mostly 6 numbers
If ins pin 26-37 were more/less than 6 numbers: in spin 38-50 there will be mostly 4-5 numbers.

during watching whats going on, we just check if the above statistical values are hit or not.

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

ALL......

The G.U.T Tracker software is excellent!

I'm seeing some great results from what I've done so far.  I will run a few hundred numbers over the next few days and then begin the test.

It (so far) really does work just like he says.  11-10  becomes 10-11 and so forth.

Whomever wrote this software and winkel both:  I'll buy you a cold one at the TwoCat Saloon!

Thanks

Sam

[Tucktuckster]

Sam,

Yes - Winkel will go down as a legend. This does deliver the goods.

The key is patience since when things are not great, you spend an hour at the wheel and you break even or make £1. Mmmmm. That'll do me.

When things are good, its a grind but an efficient grind.

CONTROL is everything! There are so many easy mistakes to slip into it is bizarre! All of them seem logical but they are dangerous and can cause a blip.

I have actually had another discovery which i cannot post here. There was a syatem posted that was copyrighted or something and which was removed. Luckily i downloaded it before it was removed. The system is a loser. However - i have found it to have amazing results when coupled with a scenario that arises from time to time on here. I will test it further, but i dont know where i stand from a sharing it view point on here.

[TwoCatSam]

tt

Naturally it is up to you whether or not you disclose your discovery, but to name the System or program and tell how you use it is certainly OK.  I am using the Chicco Flash software in conjunction with the murph system.  I have not given Chicco's software away or violated any copyright laws.

I know I have a lot of study to do on the G.U.T.  As winkel says, practice!

Thanks for your post.

Please consider revealing your discovery.  I'm assuming it is a double-advantage system of some sort.  By that I mean waiting until two systems pick the same number.

Sam

[Tucktuckster]

sam,

I'll send you a PM. Early days on testing. In effect it is a system that was great when won and awful when lost. I think GUT may identify a scenario when it is more likely to win than not creating an explosive performace.

so when a condition flashes u play it.

I am thinking that you can give me a view on whether it can be shared, since the system was removed and without detailing the system - it is sort os useless.

[TwoCatSam]

tuck

We may have to kick this upstairs to Victor!  I'll read!

Thanks a ton.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

winkel

The G.U.T. seems to be working quite well.  Tonight I stuck with it until about spin 80 and got a nice win where 2 and 3 crossed and then where 3 and >3 crossed.  Both only had about five or six numbers, so the profit would have been good.

Thanks!!

Sam

[bobco]

I have played this for real for more than a week and I'm satisfied with the result. I tried with RNG also but that didn't seem to work so good. Maybe I make a second try with RNG.
Thanks Winkel! 

[Fluker]

In effect it is a system that was great when won and awful when lost.

So is this system worthy of the name at the start of the heading... The holy grail?

[winkel]

tuckster was talking about another system which is much better adding the hints of G.U.T

so G.U.T is worth the name!

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

Fluker

This idea of winkel's is definitely worth the time it takes to study and learn it.  Use the Tracker software.

Sam

[Tucktuckster]

I have tested GUT a lot.

It works. Full stop.

The hard part is learning some of the dynamics around which option to choose when 2 etc.

The simple rules for success with GUT are as follows:

- If in doubt - sit on your hands. If doubt exists, wait for the next crossing when there is no doubt. It will come.
- Never panic or get greedy. If you lose 2 or 3 in a row, stick with it. If the string you are playing is losing and you are -40, retrack and continue, the wins will come.
- re-read this thread. there are loads of hints and tips in there and it helps to re-read.

I find this a real hard one to play in live play due to tracking but is good with GUT tracker

[winkel]

The simple rules for success with GUT are as follows:

- If in doubt - sit on your hands. If doubt exists, wait for the next crossing when there is no doubt. It will come.
- Never panic or get greedy. If you lose 2 or 3 in a row, stick with it. If the string you are playing is losing and you are -40, retrack and continue, the wins will come.
- re-read this thread. there are loads of hints and tips in there and it helps to re-read.

I find this a real hard one to play in live play due to tracking but is good with GUT tracker

[smiley=thumbsup.gif] Yes: you got the way to play!

Playing it live is difficult, I know.
You have to learn to stay cool and not to get in hurry.

best tipp:
if there is a difference of 2 or 3 so next crossing is possible,
prepare your chips for that amount
write down the numbers separately
if the crossing is up, cancel the number that came up and go and bet.

e.g for crossing "0" vs "1"
14-11
if a "0" spins up we will have 13-12
13-11
if a "0" soins up we will have 12-12

e.g. we have these 14 numbers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
spin is 8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ( 8 ) 9 10 11 12 13 14

go and bet

br
winkel

[Tucktuckster]

okay - systems to use with GUT.

no idea if this will work, but i have seen a few trends and i suspect it should.

When GUT tracker is showing a large % of zeros hitting and not repeating (ie - spins = 32, zeros = 12, 1's 20, >1 = 6, then we know the following, the zeros on this strem are ahead of themselves, the 1's are underhit and there are likely to a series of 1's being hit. The average number of 1's is around 14 and is many at present.

So how do we use this? There is no guarantee that the 1's will hit. We cannot play them all and flat bet and hope. They could miss for another 8 spins and we would be -160. For this reason we do not want to play a serious progression.

How about we look to see if there is a 12 that has an amount of 1's but none have repeated. If we do, then we play these numbers (probably 6 or 7 of them) and use an attilla style progression (seems fashionable at moment).

Why the 12 with no hits? How often do you see a 12 with 12 numbers lit up and no repeats?

Another option would be to look at the 12 with the most 1's that hit in past 10 spins say and play this, especially if it has been less hit 12.

If there are just 6 1's to play, maybe we should throw in the zero with the six 1's to give us 7 numbers.

I have not tested this, but is similar to something else that appears to work.

[Tucktuckster]

apologies to winkel for suggesting a system to play with his system.

gut works great. it does not need any other system.

however - i want to stimulate debate since no system is ever rigid. And i do not want to be someone on here who just takes others ideas and does not contribute ideas of their own.

when i played with my commodore 64 it worked well. Luckily someone found something better and we all now have it. i am pleased that simply didnnt just stick with a commodore 64 or zx spectrum.

[Tucktuckster]

-