The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[TwoCatSam]

winkel

Sorry to be so dense, but does this:

-------->=2 mean "equal to or greater than 2"?  All occurrences happening at least two times and as many as infinity?

Anyone?

Sam

[winkel]

>=2 -> 2,3,4,5,6,7,..........
>2   -> 3,4,5,6,7,.........

[TwoCatSam]

More questions about crossings.

Am I correct in assuming the larger number of the crossing, 10 vs 9 for example, must always be a 0, 1, or 2?  We can never have a >1 vs >2 can we?


We can have this, thought, right?:  1 vs (2+>2)  Assuming we have 12 "one" hits, 8 "two" hits and 3 ">2" hits, we would have 12 vs 11.

I am studying the chart with the "sums" and this confuses me.

Sam

[winkel]

look at the diagram

the sums can only grow!! They are turning to 37 straight!

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

I´m sorry

my table shows "0" "1" ">1" "2" ">2" that might be confusing.

simple bet rule: The chance to bet vst the next chance or  vs the sum of all higher chances

0 vs 1 or >0
1 vs 2 or vs >1
2 vs 3 or vs >2

also

0 vs 2 or >1
1 vs 3 or >2

and again: be carefull: sums are not falling!!!!!!! You can only bet the lower Chance to fall under the sum

br
winkel

winkel

Please note the red, 1 vs 3.  I have all the other crossings understood, but this one I cannot understand.  Suppose:

[table=,]
1,3
10,9
[/table]

If I came to that situation and bet on the numbers which had hit only once and won, then that win would go to numbers that had hit 2 or >2 and not to three.  My table would look like:

[table=,]
1,3
9,9
[/table]

So how do we bet on 1 vs 3?  And for that matter, 0 vs 2?

Sam

[winkel]

It is simple:

"0" have to fall
"3" have to rise against the "0"

so bet "0"

if it happens that a "2" appears the new situation is 9 - 10 crossing disappeared


1     3 
9   9

in this situation you had won.

always bet which is falling

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

winkel and anyone.......

Sorry, I can see no potential crossing between 1 and 3.

Let's examine 1 vs 2

19  18.......there I see a potential crossing because if a "1" number hits it will become a "2" and the table would be:

18  19.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________

But with 1 vs 3.......

10  9........you bet on all "1s" and win.  Your "3" is still a 9 and the lines are even, but not crossed.  It looks like this:

9 9......still no crossing so you bet again on all "1s".....

8 9.....and we have a crossing but not because the "3s" increased, but because the "1s" decreased. 

In most cases, both lines are moving: one up and one down.  In this case the "3" line is static and the "1" is moving toward zero.

From this, it seems to me we are betting on a potential crossing when none exists:  10 9 and then again when one does exist: 9 9.  In this case should we not wait until the numbers are even and a win would cause a somewhat backward crossing?

Can anyone but me see this?  Am I seeing wrong??

I am not good with charts and I can't program this, but I can draw it on 9th grade graph paper.

Sam

[winkel]

this is a similiar graph

it is todays touchbet-permanence

as you can see "1" (R) are falling (blue line)
While on that way it crosses the line ">2" (turqois line)
The line "<2" is a sum so it can only go upwards

btw: 19 "0" we don´t bet
it is okay if you only bet the first crossings like I do in Test-Area don´t overact and play 100 spins to watch F7 crossing with F>7

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

Professor.....

I will take that advice and stay with the 1 2 and 3 crossings.  I am finding many wins in the low numbers, around 12, when the 0 vs 1 and the 1 vs 2 are happening.

Thanks.......

Sam

[Proofreaders2000]

I give you your propers, Winkel.  GUT seems to work at both Live and Real Money RNG's.  It worked at Player's Palace (Riverbelle Live Wheel) and Golden Tiger (RNG).  Hit a bump at Phonician (most biased RNG I know of), but I feel confident about this method.  A holy grail can make profits long term and this has potential.

[Shorty]

Yes with real money, on 888's RNG.

I did tweak it a bit though to suit my smaller BR.

Do they accept U.S. players?  What was your tweak?

I'm unsure of whether they accept US players. I basically practiced this for a while and just played a little different from the way Winkel plays it, to suit my playing style. For example I don't often play on the '0' column, especially later in the game.

[TwoCatSam]

I will testify to this:

Golden Casino (Not Golden Palace!  It's a spin-off.) does accept US players and they do pay.

You must be prepared to show all forms of ID they want; DL, CC front and back, maybe water bill or rental agreement.  Anything they want and they will pay.  This is the only RNG I ever withdrew money from that I won exclusively on an RNG.

Sam

[bobco]

I was satisfied with this system for a while but I'm not so sure anymore. I think it's because the difficulty to know when to bet. Obviously it makes difference.  I have both win and lost with it, but when you get several losses in row it makes you wonder. Still I think I have won more than lost. But for now I hold on with it.

[alex00]

Hallo Winkel !
Your theory is very interesting. 
Thanks for having shared !
Why say that does not work with the Streets ?

The principle should be the same.

By

alexOO

[madupz4]

Hallo Winkel !
Your theory is very interesting. 
Thanks for having shared !
Why say that does not work with the Streets ?

The principle should be the same.

By

alexOO

That's what I said?  If you can apply it to 37 individual numbers then why wouldn't it work as effectively on 12 streets?  It would seem like it's the same thing but on a smaller scale.  Yes some individual numbers within those streets will be sleepers and won't apply but if there are 12 streets and 6 have come in, then the statistic would have to change that 7 would come in at some point.

[madupz4]

-