The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[winkel]

pls use the GUT-Tracker of droidman.
put in the numbers and it will come to you.

for your questions:

(why are you betting 16 5x?) (isn't it only suppossed to be 2x?)

This is not the betting, this is the total

(what does nr mean?)

the spread-sheet I use is also to use for another bet-selection I found.
n means I´m betting on "1"
nr means I´m betting on "1" on the row before (otherwise I would bet on another row)
this little r means just "rolling", doesn´t mena anything to GUT
rr = betting on 0
nr = betting on "1"
fr = betting on "2"

(how is the running total now 9?)

total so far -16
bet on "1" and win - bet was 11 numbers - +36-11=25 - -16+25=+9

next betting on "0"vs">1" 13units loss +9-13=-4
next betting on "1"vs""2" 11 units and win -11+36=+25 - -4+25=21

@all who enter new to this topic
please read through my explanations.
It is all explained through this topic or through "Testing G.U.T"

I can´t explain everything again and again and again. this will make this topic endless and boring.
I beg your pardon

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

droidman

I just read what you said to bj:  So if you
were thinking of adding a button for say 1+3, don't! 

Now look at what I asked winkel:  winkel, would you have bet this:  0 vs (1+3)?  I merely asked a question.  I see no harm in that.

No where did I ask bj to create a 1 + 3 crossing.  But you know--if i had--and he wanted to do it, who are you to tell him not to? 

Perhaps I'm confused on one or two things and you could possibly help me out.  Or winkel, of course.

Is there such a crossing as this: 0 v (1 + 2)?  This could/could not be 0 vs >1.  If you had a hit in the 3 column, it could be too many for a crossing.

I distinctly remember reading about the + crossing and winkel said "The sums are always rising."  What are the sums?

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

This may be where I originally got the idea.  Wildcard published this:

19- (11 + 7) = 1 = betting opportunity  ........ Now we are at school    On this example the sum is fine because 19 numbers that did not appear minus the sum of the numbers that appeared once and those that appeared more than once is one (1).

If we tabled Wildcard's lesson, it would look like this:

[table=,]
0,1,2
19,11,7
[/table]

So, is this a 0 vs >1 bet?

Look at this:

[table=,]
0,1,2,3
19,11,7,2
[/table]

Now we have no 0 v>1 as we have 19 20.  But do we have a 0 vs (1 + 2)?  Is there such a bet?  Because I've been betting just this since I started testing and I wins!

Sam

[madupz4]

Question:

Just to clarify,

is >1 (2+3) or (2+3+>3?)

[TwoCatSam]

From the first page of the thread:

one example


0x  1x >1x
19   13   5 bet 19numbers--Am I wrong in thinking winkel added 1x and >1x>?  Would that not be 0 vs (1+>1)?  0 vs (1+2) perhaps?

Do I sound annoyed? 

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Question:

Just to clarify,

is >1 (2+3) or (2+3+>3?)

Mad,

Lord, who am I to answer??!!  >1 is any number beginning with and including (2) and going to Pluto!  2 and 3 are 5 so 5 is >1  (2+3+>3?) ??  never saw that one..

Sam

[madupz4]

Question:

Just to clarify,

is >1 (2+3) or (2+3+>3?)

Mad,

Lord, who am I to answer??!!  >1 is any number beginning with and including (2) and going to Pluto!  2 and 3 are 5 so 5 is >1  (2+3+>3?) ??  never saw that one..

Sam

Right, BUT if I want to bet (0 vs. >1) do we add up 2+3+>3=? (3 columns) or just 2+>3=?

[winkel]

Big confusion in the family 

we have mainly these countings

0 1 2 3 4 5 ......

we have crossings between them: 0vs1 or 0vs2 or 0vs3
or we have a crossing between one and the rest
0vs>1 or 1vs>3 or 0vs>5

but we don´t have crossings
0vs(2+5) this is no natural line the binomial distribution would show

the >x are the sum of all numbers right of the point of view
at anytime all numbers have hit once. then they all have hit >0
at anytime all numbers have hit 3times then they all havehit >2
these are the "sums"

0     1     2 
19   11   7

So, is this a 0 vs >1 bet?

Look at this:

0     1     2     3 
19   11   7   2

Hi TCS
you created a situation that is impossible:
bet is 0vs>0

your example shows 39 numbers (19+11+7+2) we just have 37.

You will never find a betting I´ve done which crosses 1vs2+4 or any like that
I didn´t even describe it.



br
winkel

[winkel]

Right, BUT if I want to bet (0 vs. >1) do we add up 2+3+>3=? (3 columns) or just 2+>3=?

You can´t add a sum to their single components
let me give an example:

you have 2 brothers and three sisters which are 5 (and you)
Do you have 5 or 10 other children in you family?

br
winkel

[TwoCatSam]

winkel

I forgot to decrease the seven.  Here is what I meant to do:

Look at this:

[table=,]
0,1,2,3
19,11,5,2
[/table]

The above what what I meant to write.  Now, let's take it from there.  Using Wildcard's explanation where he did use (x+Y), and your word "sums" I have been using this formula: 0 vs (1+2) and 1 vs (2+3).

How refreshing to know that I have spent hours doing this wrong.

The above is why I ask so many questions which may seem to have obvious answers.

Does anyone see the obvious conundrum?  I've been doing it wrong and winning!  If I were doing it right, would I have lost??

Guess I'll do some Chicco/murph for a while.  I think I understand that one!

Sam

[winkel]

I've been doing it wrong and winning!  If I were doing it right, would I have lost??

no, because you wouldn´t have placed a bet!

br
winkel

[winkel]

Everyone who knows stochastics will know what this means:

Yesterdays result of +1423 is more than Sigma+3.

The first level to beat roulette therefore is proofed.

br
winkel

[Herb]

LOL 

[JHM]

Winkel,

Something crossed my mind. Maybe it doesn't make sense. But I'll ask anyway.

When you have a situation like:

Spin Nr   0  1  1>  2  2>
40  10   9  9  19  5  3

Now we have bet 0vs1. Can we decide to bet 1 and 0 (9+9=18 nr's).

[winkel]

1. we don´t bet more than 17 numbers
2. 18 numbers against which crossing? we don´t bet 18-19 (we would bet crossings like 19-18)
3. we bet against the rest on the right side of our point of view, we don´t bet the sum of any numbers left of our point of view.

br
winkel

[winkel]

-