The Holy Gral or G.U.T the Great Universal Theory

[trylobit]

Or you can do what I did over 2 years ago. Switch to Mac
Virus proof.

[Kon-Fu-Sed]

Switch to Mac

I have to agree.
KFS

[alex00]

I have a question for Winkel (or TCS, which I think has understood the steps).

33.  19      15   12   10   9    1    1    0
34.  12      14   13   10   9    1    1    0
35.  16      13   14   10   9    1    1    0
36.  29      13   13   11   10   1    1    0
37.  13      13   13   11   9    2    2    0
38.  13      13   13   11   9    2    1    1
39.  24      13   13   11   8    3    2    1
40.  9        12   14   11   8    3    2    1
41.  29      12   14   11   7    4    3    1 Bet 0 >1 = win
42.  32      11   15   11   7    4    3    1 Bet 0 >1 again ?

Shot 41 to win, shot 42 to have to play again?

Thanks for your answer

alex00

[Kingspin]

So......... I must be honest, I havn't read all 64 pages    So could any one tell me if this is worth the time and effort? like does it really work?

Poit my own experience of the gut is that it seems to work much better on certain wheels than others, I did some tests on the gut at gala casino with a few fair sized losses it just seemed not to work well at all on the wheel at gala casino. I quit using gut method at gala casino because losses knocked me down. On other casino wheels the wins are much more consistant. I am still trying to work it out why the gut favours some wheels over others. I know it sounds bizzarr as all wheels should play the same. Maybe bad luck was the cause i am not sure.  I have one casino where the gut method is an absolute killer and winning sessions  are just about guaranteed .  The gut by winkel is not perfect but i believe it is one of the best methods around at the moment. I keep going back to it and keep making profit , other systems have been losers time after time.

[The Spiders Kiss]

Hi Kingspin
I have been playin the G.U.T. for a few months now and I definitely win more than I lose .
Your comments on winning more on some wheels than others are a direct comparison to Sams findings.When the casino he was playin G.U.T. in changed to the Huxley starburst his winning percentage took an almighty nosedive if I remember correctly.It sure is a strange thing to behold!
As Winkel also pointed out ,you have to use a cetain amount of intelligence in the system too .As in ,if the '1's have hit say 4 times in a row then are you prepared to bet them on a fifth consecutive chance?
Regards
TSK

[winkel]

I have a question for Winkel (or TCS, which I think has understood the steps).

33.  19      15   12   10   9    1    1    0
34.  12      14   13   10   9    1    1    0
35.  16      13   14   10   9    1    1    0
36.  29      13   13   11   10   1    1    0
37.  13      13   13   11   9    2    2    0
38.  13      13   13   11   9    2    1    1
39.  24      13   13   11   8    3    2    1
40.  9        12   14   11   8    3    2    1
41.  29      12   14   11   7    4    3    1 Bet 0 >1 = win
42.  32      11   15   11   7    4    3    1 Bet 0 >1 again ?

Shot 41 to win, shot 42 to have to play again?

Thanks for your answer

alex00

Hi alex,
nice example,
just my thoughts:

"0" have 2 wins in a row then slept for 4 spins and is now moving down 1 win 1 sleep 1 win
(unfortunately we have lost our bet 0vs1 13vs13 so we are down -26)

"1" had 1 win and then slept for 3 spins and its now rising up

">1" had 4 hits in a row and 1 sleep 1 win 1 sleep

We have won 0vs>1 with a plus 24 so our BR is -2

in short:
0 is moving down
1 is moving up
>1 is waving

between spin 37 and spin 50 we expect 4 "0"; 4 "1"; and 4 ">1";
we had 2 "0", no "1; 4 ">1"

1. possible result: "0" is rising down after sleeping and is going on (bet 0vs>1)
2. possible result: "1" had no hit and are like to spin up (no bet)
3. possible result: ">1" are waving (in their results not in figures) (no bet)

as we have recovered our loss: Just jump back

br
winkel

PS: this would be also the hint for the 13 12 12 : 12 13 12 : 12 12 13 etc.

[winkel]

ref: [highlight]discussion if it is working here and not working there[/highlight]

you have always to have in mind, that there are no consecutive winnings always up. there are always losses possible.

But:
we have winnings in a row (upwards)
we have losses in a row (downwards)
we have winnings and losses (waving)

not only in a game we started, but also on the casino/table/RNG we play

when you look at my testings you will see
- that the airball is going down and then very late starts to recover
- that one of the others is losing for a while and then recovers

what you have to do is to watch in which movement you are:
You are losing: so jump and jump until you hit a winning streak (jump in spins or jump in tables!!!!)
You are winning: so stay and watch when it is starting to wave, it might be a singla for changing to go down
You are in a waving state: So have there been losings before, stay because it will go up
You are in a waving state: So have there been winning before, be prepared to stop because it might go down

do you see what is going on?

br
winkel

[alex00]

Winkel Hello ...

look at this game, as you would have played?

0: 3 4 6 9 10 14 24 25 28 29 32 34

1: 0 2 11 13 16 18 20 21 26 35 36

2: 1 5 8 12 15 19 22 30 31 33

3: 7 17 27

>3: 23

34.  20      12   17   8    7    1    1    0
35.  15      12   16   9    8    1    1    0
36.  12      12   15   10   9    1    1    0
37.  23      12   15   10   8    2    2    0
38.  17      12   14   11   9    2    2    0  Bet 0>1
39.  23      12   14   11   9    2    1    1  Bet 0>1
40.  22      12   13   12   10   2    1    1 No Bet
41.  27      12   13   12   9    3    2    1  No bet
42.  1        12   12   13   10   3    2    1 Bet 0=1
43.  17      12   12   13   9    4    3    1  Bet 0=1
44.  30      12   11   14   10   4    3    1 Bet 0=1
45.  26      12   10   15   11   4    3    1 Bet 0=2
46.  27      12   10   15   11   4    2    2 Bet 0=2
47.  0        12   9    16   12   4    2    2  Bet 0=2
48.  0        12   9    16   11   5    3    2
49.  18      12   8    17   12   5    3    2

Num ?
     Res      0    1    >1   2    >2   3    >3

The "0" has slept little ...

alex00

[winkel]

Pls look for Kon fu sed´s GUTCBA and put the spins in it.

br
winkel

[Marven]

Hi alex,

You may find the G.U.T. CBA that Winkel mentioned by following this link:
nolinks://vlsroulette.com/downloads/?sa=view;id=273



Regards,
Marven

[upiwaly]

Hello everyone,

I am reading this topic for a few days now.
And I have a question for winkel.

Have you ever thought about binomical distribution of other type of nubmers?(read to the end)
My way of thinking(this only reffers to LIVE wheel)
I make records of spins at eurobet LIVE roulette. I made around 10.000 spins. Now I will start to observe the spins with the GUT.

I make diagrams for the numbers that hit, and for the gaps between hits(example - results: 26,32,32,17, i write down 26 to 32=2, 32 to 32=0, 32 to 17=7). I also get 37 numbers. 0-36.

We cannot determine the number, that is somehow better to play in a long term. My diagrams are becoming equal. Every number will soon hit the 2.7%.

But with the gaps between, it is different story.

I have 15 GAPS, that have above 2,85% of hitting. And from the beginning of my records, those gaps are still the same.

I think, that the gaps also have to cross. And obviously they are more predictible than numbers. And we have the same numbers 0-36.
Do you think, it would be more effective, if we would search for binomical distribution with the gaps?

I can give you an excell sheet with lets say 200 gaps, or as many gaps as you want. Could you do some tests, to see, if it is more secure to seek binomical distribute in gaps?

regards from Slovenia

[alex00]

Pls look for Kon fu sed´s GUTCBA and put the spins in it.

br
winkel

Winkel... I'm sorry, but I have not saved the exits, because it rewrites track4 numbers.

[winkel]

But with the gaps between, it is different story.

I think, that the gaps also have to cross. And obviously they are more predictible than numbers.

Hi upiwaly,

it makes no difference. Because the size of the gaps is just another sorting of the numbers on the wheel.

I call it "Universal" because it works on any kind of binomial distribution.
It is no difference on random.org-numbers, RNg, Lievewheel with dealer, lievewheel with airball. (no matter European or Amercian wheels)
You could turn the wheel to the arithmical order and it would work also.

br
winkel

[winkel]

Winkel... I'm sorry, but I have not saved the exits, because it rewrites track4 numbers.

Alex,

it doesnt matter how I would have played your session, it matters how you play it.

I would say, play a session (give the results.txt a rename so you can save it) and then put the numbers in the GUTCBA)

There you will see, what crossings you have missed.

On the other hand: There are some session which will lose. You can´t always win.#

38.  17      12   14   11   9    2    2    0  Bet 0>1
39.  23      12   14   11   9    2    1    1  Bet 0>1
40.  22      12   13   12   10   2    1    1 No Bet [highlight]here you could have bet a 3rd time[/highlight]
41.  27      12   13   12   9    3    2    1  No bet [highlight]here you should have changed to 1vs>1 win in 2nd spin[/highlight]
42.  1        12   12   13   10   3    2    1 Bet 0=1
43.  17      12   12   13   9    4    3    1  Bet 0=1
44.  30      12   11   14   10   4    3    1 Bet 0=1 [highlight]here you could have bet 1vs2 win[/highlight]
45.  26      12   10   15   11   4    3    1 Bet 0=2
46.  27      12   10   15   11   4    2    2 Bet 0=2
47.  0        12   9    16   12   4    2    2  Bet 0=2
48.  0        12   9    16   11   5    3    2
49.  18      12   8    17   12   5    3    2

If there is a long sleeping column I usually bet it after a loss [highlight]and it must have moved once[/highlight].

[RCEC]

Hi Winkel!
You know me I´m crazy and I want to tell "My Way" of your genious RNF better =0 =1 >1

nolinks://nolinks.roulette-board.de/index.php?act=ST&f=3&t=5768&st=480#entry114788

If someone needs translation ask!

CU
Gerry

[RCEC]

-