Maths and Roulette: Nobody can lose

[mogul397]

I feel like the "robust stragegy" by top player is a simplified version
of this.

nolinks://nolinks.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=21631.30

Am I wrong?

[JLP]

I feel like the "robust stragegy" by top player is a simplified version
of this.

nolinks://nolinks.vlsroulette.com/index.php?topic=21631.30

Am I wrong?

I think you are wrong, this strategy is based on Hot numbers that have hit 3 or more times, the splits strategy is based on Waker splits (cold numbers).

[nextyear]

Player, what you do after 2nd cycle with numbers from 1st cycle, which appear also in 2nd cycle, do you take them in 3rd cycle with others?

Thanks

[mogul397]

I think you are wrong, this strategy is based on Hot numbers that have hit 3 or more times, the splits strategy is based on Waker splits (cold numbers).

Maybe I presented it wrong. I guess the post I mentioned talked about the splits
that were NOT hit. My observation (after making an excel chart to graph them)
was that in each 6 splits, the next split had a pretty good chance of a hit on
a slit of the previous 6 that I was tracking.

It works. But my name doesn't elicit any interest of actual value of thought.

You should try it. (Easier than watching the last 37 or 21 or whatever.

[krist]

Something went wrong, I don't understand is it your mistake or mine but it failed, sorry

[nottophammer]

I adapted the sheet too show 14#’s to bet.
83 spin in total.
The 2nd cycle was too many non-hits of the 37 non-hits.
I had the #18 with unit of 1 and unit of 5; but could see the bank roll was dropping so just used units of 1.
As the 2nd cycle was giving too many numbers to bet, I had after dropping the #18, numbers to bet 27-16-17-12-19-10-8-26-1-4-22-34-36
If I had dropped earlier numbers like the #12; I don’t think I would have had a positive BR.
You can see I had to increase the stakes and ended +50
But at spin 23 was +32

[nottophammer]

Take the early profit

[nottophammer]

-